Kuniyoshi Abumi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Kuniyoshi Abumi has a total of 26 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Manabu Ito
Department of Advanced Medicine for Spine and Spinal Cord Disorders, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita-15, Nishi-7, Kitaku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan
9 shared publicationsKiyoshi Kaneda
8 shared publicationsYasuhiro Shono
6 shared publications- Hideki Sudo
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan
5 shared publications Akio Minami
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita-15, Nishi-7, Kitaku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan
4 shared publicationsHideki Sudo
Hokkaido University
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 31 January 2013
- Published by Elsevier in The Spine Journal
- Vol. 13 (1) , e1-e6
Cervical myelopathy resulting from combined ossification of the ligamentum flavum and posterior longitudinal ligament: report of two cases and literature review
- 31 January 2013
- Published by Elsevier in The Spine Journal
- Vol. 13 (1) , e1-e6
Cervical myelopathy resulting from combined ossification of the ligamentum flavum and posterior longitudinal ligament: report of two cases and literature review
- 1 August 2012
- Published by Elsevier in The Spine Journal
- Vol. 12 (8) , 714-715
Post-traumatic lumbar subdural hematoma
- 1 August 2012
- Published by Elsevier in The Spine Journal
- Vol. 12 (8) , 714-715
Post-traumatic lumbar subdural hematoma
- 1 May 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in European Spine Journal
- Vol. 21 (8) , 1580-1589
A retrospective study of congenital osseous anomalies at the craniocervical junction treated by occipitocervical plate-rod systems
To evaluate the effectiveness of posterior occipitocervical reconstruction using the anchors of cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems for patients with congenital osseous anomalies at the craniocervical junction. Twenty patients with congenital osseous lesions who underwent posterior occipitocervical fusion using the anchors of cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems for reduction and fixation from 1996 to 2009 were reviewed. The lesions included os odontoideum, occipitalization of the atlas, congenital C2–3 fusion, congenital atlantoaxial subluxation, congenital basilar invagination and combined anomalies. The clinical assessment and the measurements of the images were performed preoperatively, postoperatively and at most recent follow-up. The combined deformity of flexion of the occipitoatlantoaxial complex and invagination of the odontoid process associated with congenital osseous lesions at the craniocervical junction was corrected by application of combined forces of extension and distraction between the occiput and the cervical pedicle screws. Preoperative myelopathy improved in 94.7 % patients. The mean Ranawat value, Redlund-Johnnell value, atlantodental distance, occiput (O)–C2 angle, and C2–C7 lordosis angle improved postoperatively and was sustained at most recent follow-up. The mean cervicomedullary angle improved from 129.3° preoperatively to 153.3° postoperatively. The mean range of motion at the lower adjacent motion segment remained unchanged at most recent follow-up. The fusion rate was 95 %. The results of the present study indicate that posterior occipitocervical reconstruction using the anchors of cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems is an effective technique for treatment of deformities and/or instability caused by congenital osseous anomalies at the craniocervical junction.
- 1 May 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in European Spine Journal
- Vol. 21 (8) , 1580-1589
A retrospective study of congenital osseous anomalies at the craniocervical junction treated by occipitocervical plate-rod systems
To evaluate the effectiveness of posterior occipitocervical reconstruction using the anchors of cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems for patients with congenital osseous anomalies at the craniocervical junction. Twenty patients with congenital osseous lesions who underwent posterior occipitocervical fusion using the anchors of cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems for reduction and fixation from 1996 to 2009 were reviewed. The lesions included os odontoideum, occipitalization of the atlas, congenital C2–3 fusion, congenital atlantoaxial subluxation, congenital basilar invagination and combined anomalies. The clinical assessment and the measurements of the images were performed preoperatively, postoperatively and at most recent follow-up. The combined deformity of flexion of the occipitoatlantoaxial complex and invagination of the odontoid process associated with congenital osseous lesions at the craniocervical junction was corrected by application of combined forces of extension and distraction between the occiput and the cervical pedicle screws. Preoperative myelopathy improved in 94.7 % patients. The mean Ranawat value, Redlund-Johnnell value, atlantodental distance, occiput (O)–C2 angle, and C2–C7 lordosis angle improved postoperatively and was sustained at most recent follow-up. The mean cervicomedullary angle improved from 129.3° preoperatively to 153.3° postoperatively. The mean range of motion at the lower adjacent motion segment remained unchanged at most recent follow-up. The fusion rate was 95 %. The results of the present study indicate that posterior occipitocervical reconstruction using the anchors of cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems is an effective technique for treatment of deformities and/or instability caused by congenital osseous anomalies at the craniocervical junction.
- 1 April 2012
- Published by Elsevier in The Spine Journal
- Vol. 12 (4) , e18-e21
Spinal cord compression by hematoma in the cervical ligamentum flavum: a case report
- 1 April 2012
- Published by Elsevier in The Spine Journal
- Vol. 12 (4) , e18-e21
Spinal cord compression by hematoma in the cervical ligamentum flavum: a case report
- 1 March 2012
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 37 (5) , E349-E356
Reconstruction of the Subaxial Cervical Spine Using Pedicle Screw Instrumentation
Review article. To review the indications, detailed techniques, and complications of cervical pedicle screw fixation procedure. Although screw insertion into the cervical pedicles has been considered too risky for the neurovascular structures except C2 and C7, biomechanical studies revealed a superior stabilizing effect of pedicle screw fixation in the cervical spine to other fixation procedures including lateral mass screw fixation. In addition, several investigators reported superior reconstructive results of unstable cervical spine. A literature review and review of the authors' experience in the treatment of the patients with unstable cervical spine and/or cervical spinal deformities using cervical pedicle screw fixation procedure. Pedicle screw fixation is biomechanically most reliable for reconstruction of the cervical spine in various kinds of disorders. Previously reported articles revealed that pedicle screw fixation is useful for reconstruction of unstable cervical spine and correction of cervical deformities. Neurovascular complication by this procedure cannot be completely eliminated; however, it can be minimized by sufficient preoperative imaging studies and strict control of screw placement during surgery. Modern technology of computer navigation system and newly developing aiming devices can be expected to increase the accuracy of screw placement. Pedicle screw provides excellent 3-dimensional fixations and is a useful procedure for reconstruction of the cervical spine in various kinds of disorders. Possible neurovascular complication can be minimized by sufficient preoperative imaging studies and strict control of screw placement during surgery.
- 1 March 2012
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 37 (5) , E349-E356
Reconstruction of the Subaxial Cervical Spine Using Pedicle Screw Instrumentation
Review article. To review the indications, detailed techniques, and complications of cervical pedicle screw fixation procedure. Although screw insertion into the cervical pedicles has been considered too risky for the neurovascular structures except C2 and C7, biomechanical studies revealed a superior stabilizing effect of pedicle screw fixation in the cervical spine to other fixation procedures including lateral mass screw fixation. In addition, several investigators reported superior reconstructive results of unstable cervical spine. A literature review and review of the authors' experience in the treatment of the patients with unstable cervical spine and/or cervical spinal deformities using cervical pedicle screw fixation procedure. Pedicle screw fixation is biomechanically most reliable for reconstruction of the cervical spine in various kinds of disorders. Previously reported articles revealed that pedicle screw fixation is useful for reconstruction of unstable cervical spine and correction of cervical deformities. Neurovascular complication by this procedure cannot be completely eliminated; however, it can be minimized by sufficient preoperative imaging studies and strict control of screw placement during surgery. Modern technology of computer navigation system and newly developing aiming devices can be expected to increase the accuracy of screw placement. Pedicle screw provides excellent 3-dimensional fixations and is a useful procedure for reconstruction of the cervical spine in various kinds of disorders. Possible neurovascular complication can be minimized by sufficient preoperative imaging studies and strict control of screw placement during surgery.
- 30 September 2010
- Published by Elsevier in The Spine Journal
- Vol. 10 (9) , S118
Prospective Comparative Analysis of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Posterolateral Fusion with Percutaneous Pedicle Screws vs. Conventional Approach for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
- 30 September 2010
- Published by Elsevier in The Spine Journal
- Vol. 10 (9) , S118
Prospective Comparative Analysis of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Posterolateral Fusion with Percutaneous Pedicle Screws vs. Conventional Approach for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
- 15 July 2003
- Vol. 28 (14) , 1573-80
Types of spinal instability that require interbody support in posterior lumbar reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical investigation.
Pedicle screw fixation alone for sequential spinal instabilities was biomechanically compared with pedicle screw fixation using interbody cages. To evaluate biomechanical effects of interbody cages on construct stiffness, pedicle-screw strain, and the adjacent level in posterior lumbar reconstruction using pedicle screw fixation. It remains undetermined what types of spinal instability require interbody support in posterior lumbar reconstruction. For this study, 10 calf spines (L3-L6) were used. Sequential destabilization was performed at L4-L5 followed by posterior reconstruction using pedicle screw fixation (PS) and interbody cages as follows: intact + PS (I-PS), medial facetectomy + PS (MF-PS), total facetectomy + PS (TF-PS), partial discectomy + PS (D-PS), and D-PS + interbody cages (PLIF). Biomechanical testing was performed under flexion and extension loading modes. Construct stiffness (L4-L5), rod-screw bending strain, and range of motion (ROM) at the upper adjacent level (L3-L4) were analyzed. In terms of construct stiffness (L4-L5), all the reconstructions except D-PS demonstrated higher construct stiffness than the intact spine (P < 0.05). The PLIF showed the highest stiffness among all the reconstructions (P < 0.05). In terms of ROM (L3-L4), all the reconstructions increased the ROM, as compared with the intact state (P < 0.05). Importantly, PLIF showed significantly greater ROM than all the other reconstructions except I-PS (P < 0.05). In terms of rod-screw strain, the D-PS resulted in higher strain than the other groups (P < 0.05). The PLIF presented less strain than the other reconstructions (P < 0.05). For spinal instability with preserved anterior load sharing, pedicle screw fixation alone is biomechanically adequate, and interbody cages should not be used because they further increase segmental motion at the adjacent segment. However, PS alone provides insufficient stability and high implant strain in case of damaged anterior column. In such cases, additional interbody cages significantly increase construct stiffness and decrease hardware strain. However, they increase ROM at the adjacent segment as well.
- 15 July 2003
- Vol. 28 (14) , 1573-80
Types of spinal instability that require interbody support in posterior lumbar reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical investigation.
Pedicle screw fixation alone for sequential spinal instabilities was biomechanically compared with pedicle screw fixation using interbody cages. To evaluate biomechanical effects of interbody cages on construct stiffness, pedicle-screw strain, and the adjacent level in posterior lumbar reconstruction using pedicle screw fixation. It remains undetermined what types of spinal instability require interbody support in posterior lumbar reconstruction. For this study, 10 calf spines (L3-L6) were used. Sequential destabilization was performed at L4-L5 followed by posterior reconstruction using pedicle screw fixation (PS) and interbody cages as follows: intact + PS (I-PS), medial facetectomy + PS (MF-PS), total facetectomy + PS (TF-PS), partial discectomy + PS (D-PS), and D-PS + interbody cages (PLIF). Biomechanical testing was performed under flexion and extension loading modes. Construct stiffness (L4-L5), rod-screw bending strain, and range of motion (ROM) at the upper adjacent level (L3-L4) were analyzed. In terms of construct stiffness (L4-L5), all the reconstructions except D-PS demonstrated higher construct stiffness than the intact spine (P < 0.05). The PLIF showed the highest stiffness among all the reconstructions (P < 0.05). In terms of ROM (L3-L4), all the reconstructions increased the ROM, as compared with the intact state (P < 0.05). Importantly, PLIF showed significantly greater ROM than all the other reconstructions except I-PS (P < 0.05). In terms of rod-screw strain, the D-PS resulted in higher strain than the other groups (P < 0.05). The PLIF presented less strain than the other reconstructions (P < 0.05). For spinal instability with preserved anterior load sharing, pedicle screw fixation alone is biomechanically adequate, and interbody cages should not be used because they further increase segmental motion at the adjacent segment. However, PS alone provides insufficient stability and high implant strain in case of damaged anterior column. In such cases, additional interbody cages significantly increase construct stiffness and decrease hardware strain. However, they increase ROM at the adjacent segment as well.
- 1 November 2000
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 25 (22) , 2899-2905
Surgical Treatment of Cervical Destructive Spondyloarthropathy (DSA)
Sixteen patients with hemodialysis-associated cervical spine disorders underwent surgical treatment. After analysis of the surgical results, the optimum surgical procedures for these disorders were discussed. To evaluate the surgical results of cervical spine disorders associated with long-term hemodialysis and to propose the optimum surgical procedures for successful outcomes. There have been few reports regarding surgical results of hemodialysis-related cervical spine disorders. Surgical treatment for this disorder is still challenging. Sixteen patients with hemodialysis-associated cervical spine disorders were treated surgically. Duration of hemodialysis ranged from 8 to 27 years (average, 17 years). Before surgery, 14 patients showed severe cervical myelopathy, and the other 2 had radiculopathy in the upper extremities. Ten patients with marked destructive changes underwent circumferential reconstructive surgery involving pedicle screw fixation, anterior strut bone grafting, and posterior and/or anterior decompression. Two patients with cervical radiculopathy underwent posterior nerve root decompression by foraminotomy and fusion by pedicle screw fixation or spinous process wiring. The remaining four patients without spinal instability underwent posterior decompression by open-door laminoplasty. Two patients died during follow-up. Follow-up periods in the surviving 14 patients ranged from 25 months to 92 months (average, 53 months). Marked neurologic recovery was obtained in all patients after surgery. Successful spinal fusion was obtained in all patients except one who underwent posterior fusion by spinous process wiring. Progressive destructive changes with significant instability at the adjacent mobile segments were observed in two patients who underwent circumferential fusion with a pedicle screw system more than 2 years after the initial surgery. The pedicle screw system achieved a high fusion rate in reconstructive surgery of cervical destructive spondyloarthropathy, even in the presence of severe bone fragility.
- 1 November 2000
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 25 (22) , 2899-2905
Surgical Treatment of Cervical Destructive Spondyloarthropathy (DSA)
Sixteen patients with hemodialysis-associated cervical spine disorders underwent surgical treatment. After analysis of the surgical results, the optimum surgical procedures for these disorders were discussed. To evaluate the surgical results of cervical spine disorders associated with long-term hemodialysis and to propose the optimum surgical procedures for successful outcomes. There have been few reports regarding surgical results of hemodialysis-related cervical spine disorders. Surgical treatment for this disorder is still challenging. Sixteen patients with hemodialysis-associated cervical spine disorders were treated surgically. Duration of hemodialysis ranged from 8 to 27 years (average, 17 years). Before surgery, 14 patients showed severe cervical myelopathy, and the other 2 had radiculopathy in the upper extremities. Ten patients with marked destructive changes underwent circumferential reconstructive surgery involving pedicle screw fixation, anterior strut bone grafting, and posterior and/or anterior decompression. Two patients with cervical radiculopathy underwent posterior nerve root decompression by foraminotomy and fusion by pedicle screw fixation or spinous process wiring. The remaining four patients without spinal instability underwent posterior decompression by open-door laminoplasty. Two patients died during follow-up. Follow-up periods in the surviving 14 patients ranged from 25 months to 92 months (average, 53 months). Marked neurologic recovery was obtained in all patients after surgery. Successful spinal fusion was obtained in all patients except one who underwent posterior fusion by spinous process wiring. Progressive destructive changes with significant instability at the adjacent mobile segments were observed in two patients who underwent circumferential fusion with a pedicle screw system more than 2 years after the initial surgery. The pedicle screw system achieved a high fusion rate in reconstructive surgery of cervical destructive spondyloarthropathy, even in the presence of severe bone fragility.
- Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2000
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 25 (8) , 962-969
Complications of Pedicle Screw Fixation in Reconstructive Surgery of the Cervical Spine
Study Design. Retrospective evaluation of complications in 180 consecutive patients with cervical disorders who had been treated by using pedicle screw fixation systems. To determine the risks associated with pedicle screw fixation in the cervical spine and to emphasize the importance of preoperative planning and surgical techniques in reducing the risks of this procedure. Generally, pedicle screw fixation in the cervical spine has been considered too risky for the neurovascular structures. There have been several reports describing the complications of lateral mass screw–plate fixation. However, no studies have examined in detail the complications associated with cervical pedicle screw fixation. One hundred eighty patients who underwent cervical reconstructive surgery using cervical pedicle screw fixation were reviewed to clarify the complications associated with the pedicle screw fixation procedure. Cervical disorders were spinal injuries in 70 patients and nontraumatic lesions in 110 patients. Seven hundred twelve screws were inserted into the cervical pedicles, and the locations of 669 screws were radiologically evaluated. Injury of the vertebral artery occurred in one patient. The bleeding was stopped by bone wax, and no neurologic complication developed after surgery. On computed tomographic (CT) scan, 45 screws (6.7%) were found to penetrate the pedicle, and 2 of 45 screws caused radiculopathy. Besides these three neurovascular complications directly attributed to screw insertion, radiculopathy caused by iatrogenic foraminal stenosis from excessive reduction of the translational deformity was observed in one patient. The incidence of the clinically significant complications caused by pedicle screw insertion was low. Complications associated with cervical pedicle screw fixation can be minimized by sufficient preoperative imaging studies of the pedicles and strict control of screw insertion. Pedicle screw fixation is a useful procedure for reconstruction of the cervical spine in various kinds of disorders and can be performed safely.
- 1 April 2000
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 25 (8) , 962-969
Top Cited PapersComplications of Pedicle Screw Fixation in Reconstructive Surgery of the Cervical Spine
Study Design. Retrospective evaluation of complications in 180 consecutive patients with cervical disorders who had been treated by using pedicle screw fixation systems. To determine the risks associated with pedicle screw fixation in the cervical spine and to emphasize the importance of preoperative planning and surgical techniques in reducing the risks of this procedure. Generally, pedicle screw fixation in the cervical spine has been considered too risky for the neurovascular structures. There have been several reports describing the complications of lateral mass screw–plate fixation. However, no studies have examined in detail the complications associated with cervical pedicle screw fixation. One hundred eighty patients who underwent cervical reconstructive surgery using cervical pedicle screw fixation were reviewed to clarify the complications associated with the pedicle screw fixation procedure. Cervical disorders were spinal injuries in 70 patients and nontraumatic lesions in 110 patients. Seven hundred twelve screws were inserted into the cervical pedicles, and the locations of 669 screws were radiologically evaluated. Injury of the vertebral artery occurred in one patient. The bleeding was stopped by bone wax, and no neurologic complication developed after surgery. On computed tomographic (CT) scan, 45 screws (6.7%) were found to penetrate the pedicle, and 2 of 45 screws caused radiculopathy. Besides these three neurovascular complications directly attributed to screw insertion, radiculopathy caused by iatrogenic foraminal stenosis from excessive reduction of the translational deformity was observed in one patient. The incidence of the clinically significant complications caused by pedicle screw insertion was low. Complications associated with cervical pedicle screw fixation can be minimized by sufficient preoperative imaging studies of the pedicles and strict control of screw insertion. Pedicle screw fixation is a useful procedure for reconstruction of the cervical spine in various kinds of disorders and can be performed safely.
- 1 January 2000
- Published by Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG) in Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
- Vol. 92 (1) , 30-37
Indirect posterior reduction and fusion of the traumatic herniated disc by using a cervical pedicle screw system
Object. In this study the authors retrospectively review 16 patients with traumatic disc herniation secondary to middle and lower cervical spine injuries who underwent a single posterior reduction and fusion procedure in which a cervical pedicle screw system was used. The study was undertaken to evaluate whether the procedure effectively reduced the disc herniation and whether it can be safely conducted without performing anterior decompressive surgery. Methods. A total of 73 patients with middle and lower cervical spine injuries were identified. In 50 patients, pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance (MR) images were obtained, and disc herniation was defined as the presence of an extruded disc that deformed the thecal sac or nerve roots. Traumatic disc herniation was revealed in 16 patients (32%) who underwent a single posterior reduction/fusion procedure in which a cervical pedicle screw system was used. The average follow-up period was 4.25 years (2–6.25 years). In all patients the average kyphotic deformity was 18°, which was corrected to 0.7° lordosis postoperatively. Anterior translation was reduced from 8 to 0.7 mm. The preoperative disc height ratio of 63% (normal 100%) was improved to 104%. Preoperative MR images revealed traumatic disc herniation in all 16 patients; postsurgery, reduction or reversal of disc herniation was observed in all patients. Thecal sac and/or spinal cord compression had disappeared after indirect decompression was achieved using a posterior procedure. No additional decompressive procedures were required to remove residual herniated disc material. Preoperatively, four patients presented with cervical radiculopathy, 10 with myelopathy (eight incomplete and two complete), and two without neurological symptoms. At final follow up, complete recovery was observed in all four patients with radiculopathy and improvement of at least one Frankel grade was shown in six patients (60%) with myelopathy. There were no cases of neurological deterioration immediately after surgery or during the course of the follow-up period. In all patients solid bone union was demonstrated, and there were no implant-related complications. Conclusions. Traumatic disc herniation may occur frequently in association with injury of the cervical spine. The incidence of traumatic disc herniation in our series was 32%. The cervical pedicle screw system allowed three-dimensional reduction of the injured cervical segment and reduction or reversal of a disc herniation. After surgery, compression of the thecal sac and/or spinal cord had disappeared. The cervical pedicle screw system provides effective and safe fixation of the cervical spine injury—related traumatic disc herniation, and the surgery can be performed safely in a single posteriorapproach procedure without need of additional anterior decompressive interventions.
- 1 January 2000
- Published by Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG) in Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
- Vol. 92 (1) , 30-37
Indirect posterior reduction and fusion of the traumatic herniated disc by using a cervical pedicle screw system
Object. In this study the authors retrospectively review 16 patients with traumatic disc herniation secondary to middle and lower cervical spine injuries who underwent a single posterior reduction and fusion procedure in which a cervical pedicle screw system was used. The study was undertaken to evaluate whether the procedure effectively reduced the disc herniation and whether it can be safely conducted without performing anterior decompressive surgery. Methods. A total of 73 patients with middle and lower cervical spine injuries were identified. In 50 patients, pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance (MR) images were obtained, and disc herniation was defined as the presence of an extruded disc that deformed the thecal sac or nerve roots. Traumatic disc herniation was revealed in 16 patients (32%) who underwent a single posterior reduction/fusion procedure in which a cervical pedicle screw system was used. The average follow-up period was 4.25 years (2–6.25 years). In all patients the average kyphotic deformity was 18°, which was corrected to 0.7° lordosis postoperatively. Anterior translation was reduced from 8 to 0.7 mm. The preoperative disc height ratio of 63% (normal 100%) was improved to 104%. Preoperative MR images revealed traumatic disc herniation in all 16 patients; postsurgery, reduction or reversal of disc herniation was observed in all patients. Thecal sac and/or spinal cord compression had disappeared after indirect decompression was achieved using a posterior procedure. No additional decompressive procedures were required to remove residual herniated disc material. Preoperatively, four patients presented with cervical radiculopathy, 10 with myelopathy (eight incomplete and two complete), and two without neurological symptoms. At final follow up, complete recovery was observed in all four patients with radiculopathy and improvement of at least one Frankel grade was shown in six patients (60%) with myelopathy. There were no cases of neurological deterioration immediately after surgery or during the course of the follow-up period. In all patients solid bone union was demonstrated, and there were no implant-related complications. Conclusions. Traumatic disc herniation may occur frequently in association with injury of the cervical spine. The incidence of traumatic disc herniation in our series was 32%. The cervical pedicle screw system allowed three-dimensional reduction of the injured cervical segment and reduction or reversal of a disc herniation. After surgery, compression of the thecal sac and/or spinal cord had disappeared. The cervical pedicle screw system provides effective and safe fixation of the cervical spine injury—related traumatic disc herniation, and the surgery can be performed safely in a single posteriorapproach procedure without need of additional anterior decompressive interventions.