Satoshi Mochizuki

Our aim is to elucidate causative factors for gallstones, especially focusing on Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection. We analyzed 15,551 Japanese adults who had no history of gastrectomy, cholecystectomy, HP eradication, and didn’t use proton pump inhibitors, anti-diabetic drugs, or anti-cholesterol drugs. 1,057 subjects who previously had HP eradication were analyzed separately. Gallstones were detected in 409 of 8,625 men (4.74 %) and 285 of 6,926 women (4.11 %) by ultrasonography. Among the 25 factors univariately analyzed, age, HP infection, alcohol intake, weight, body mass index (BMI), and 14 blood test values (AST, ALT, ALP, γ-GTP, T-Chol, HDL-Chol, LDL-Chol, TG, TP, Hb, HbA1c, pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II, and pepsinogen I/II ratio) displayed significant association with gallstones (p < 0.05), whereas gender, smoking, height, and three blood test values (Alb, T-Bil, MCV) did not. Multivariate analysis showed that age, gender, alcohol intake, BMI, γ-GTP, LDL-Chol, TP, and HP infection had significant association (p < 0.05). Successive multiple logistic regression analysis calculating odds ratio (OR) and standardized coefficients (β) showed that age (OR/β = 1.57/0.450), BMI (OR/β = 1.30/0.264), HP infection (OR/β = 1.51/0.206), lower alcohol intake (OR/β = 1.33/0.144), γ-GTP (OR/β = 1.15/0.139), and pepsinogen I/II ratio (OR/β = 1.08/0.038) have significant positive association with gallstones, whereas gender does not. The gallstone prevalence among HP-negative, HP-eradicated, and HP-positive subjects was 3.81, 4.73 and 6.08 %, respectively. The matched analysis controlling age, BMI, γ-GTP, alcohol intake, pepsinogen I/II ratio and gender also demonstrated that gallstone prevalence among HP-eradicated subjects was significantly lower compared with HP-positive subjects (p < 0.05). HP infection is positively associated with gallstones. HP eradication may lead to prevention of gallstones.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a very common disorder worldwide, comprised of reflux esophagitis (RE) and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). As more than half of GERD patients are classified into the NERD group, precise evaluation of bothersome epigastric symptoms is essential. Nevertheless, compared with many reports targeting endoscopic reflux esophagitis, large-scale studies focusing on GERD symptoms have been very scarce.

The risk of venous thromboembolism has been reported to increase when receiving bevacizumab. Many cancer patients are reported to have elevated D-dimer levels. It is not clear what D-dimer level might indicate an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in the colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy. The D-dimer levels and any event concurrent with an elevated D-dimer level were evaluated in patients receiving bevacizumab. The D-dimer cut-off level was determined using the receiver-operating characteristic analysis. The selection criteria were as follows: histologically proven metastatic and unresectable colorectal adenocarcinoma; no prior chemotherapy containing bevacizumab; D-dimer test performed repetitively on the baseline and during bevacizumab administration; no venous thromboembolism identified at the baseline; and enhanced computed tomographic scan performed every 2 months. Sixty-nine patients were included. The chemotherapy regimens with bevacizumab included the regimen of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), the regimen of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI), and leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil. The median baseline D-dimer level was 1.2 µg/ml. The appropriate D-dimer cut-off level was 3 µg/ml with the negative predictive value of 98% and relative risk of 6.9. Twenty-one of 69 patients showed elevated D-dimer levels of >3 µg/ml, with 11 patients for unknown reasons, 6 with tumor progression, 3 with venous thromboembolism and 1 with sepsis. In the remaining 48 patients whose D-dimer levels were ≤3 µg/ml, only one patient developed a venous thromboembolism. A D-dimer cut-off level of 3 µg/ml might be a useful indicator level to exclude venous thromboembolism or show an increased risk for venous thromboembolism in colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy.