Gerome C. Gauchard
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Gerome C. Gauchard has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Dominique Deviterne
Conditions and Processes of Learning and Socialisation (GECPAS), IUFM de Lorraine, Maxéville, France
2 shared publications- Philippe Perrin
Research Unit DevAH—Development, Adaptation and Handicap, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lorraine, 54500 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
2 shared publications Alexis Lion
1 shared publicationClaude Simon
1 shared publicationCécile Parietti-Winkler
1 shared publicationDominique Lavisse
Balance Control and Motor Performance (EPM), Nancy-University, UFR STAPS, University Henri Poincaré, Nancy 1, Villers-lès-Nancy, France
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 January 2013
- Published by Elsevier in Gait & Posture
- Vol. 37 (1) , 82-87
Impact of pre-operative regular physical activity on balance control compensation after vestibular schwannoma surgery
- 1 January 2013
- Published by Elsevier in Gait & Posture
- Vol. 37 (1) , 82-87
Impact of pre-operative regular physical activity on balance control compensation after vestibular schwannoma surgery
- 7 September 2010
- Published by Wiley in The Laryngoscope
- Vol. 120 (10) , 2108-2109
European Society for Clinical Evaluation of Balance Disorders: Discussion about dual-task conditions combining postural control with cognitive tasks
- 7 September 2010
- Published by Wiley in The Laryngoscope
- Vol. 120 (10) , 2108-2109
European Society for Clinical Evaluation of Balance Disorders: Discussion about dual-task conditions combining postural control with cognitive tasks
- 1 January 2007
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Somatosensory & Motor Research
- Vol. 24 (6) , 163-169
Cognitive processing and motor skill learning in motor-handicapped teenagers: Effects of learning method
This study aimed to assess the efficiency of a motor skill learning method intended to promote learning course personalization through an increase in cognitive processing deployment in motor-handicapped persons. Thirty-three secondary school students volunteered to participate in an archery motor skill learning session, 11 motor-handicapped (MH1) and 11 able-bodied (AB) teenagers following a standard learning method, and 11 motor-handicapped teenagers following a cognitive enriched learning method (MH2) based on the use of an individually written and illustrated document. The results showed that MH1 displayed lower performances than AB, both in terms of the mental representations of the movements expected and performed and of efficiency of the movement. On the other hand, MH2 performances were higher than MH1 for all these parameters, and similar to those of AB at the end of the learning session. Personalization of the learning course allowed optimization of the learning potential in motor-handicapped teenagers to resolve the difficulties inherent to their handicap.
- 1 January 2007
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Somatosensory & Motor Research
- Vol. 24 (6) , 163-169
Cognitive processing and motor skill learning in motor-handicapped teenagers: Effects of learning method
This study aimed to assess the efficiency of a motor skill learning method intended to promote learning course personalization through an increase in cognitive processing deployment in motor-handicapped persons. Thirty-three secondary school students volunteered to participate in an archery motor skill learning session, 11 motor-handicapped (MH1) and 11 able-bodied (AB) teenagers following a standard learning method, and 11 motor-handicapped teenagers following a cognitive enriched learning method (MH2) based on the use of an individually written and illustrated document. The results showed that MH1 displayed lower performances than AB, both in terms of the mental representations of the movements expected and performed and of efficiency of the movement. On the other hand, MH2 performances were higher than MH1 for all these parameters, and similar to those of AB at the end of the learning session. Personalization of the learning course allowed optimization of the learning potential in motor-handicapped teenagers to resolve the difficulties inherent to their handicap.