Erlenawati Sawir
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Erlenawati Sawir has a total of 2 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Simon Marginson
The University of Melbourne
3 shared publications - Sarjit Kaur
Universiti Sains Malaysia
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 23 January 2013
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Globalisation, Societies and Education
- Vol. 11 (3) , 359-378
Internationalisation of higher education curriculum: the contribution of international students
Internationalisation of Australian higher education was initially characterised as growth in the number of international students. While the economic benefits brought by this student cohort and the challenges associated with teaching them are well noted in the literature, their academic contributions are hardly acknowledged. Using a qualitative research approach, the paper explores the extent to which international students facilitate the internationalisation of the curriculum and the intercultural learning of domestic students. Interviews with academic staff in one university in Australia indicated that international students brought a diversity of cultures that inspired teachers in their teaching. While academic staff members positively value these potentials, they argued that domestic students remained neglectful and unaware of the changing cultural environment. It was a challenge for staff to get domestic students to utilise the cultural resources represented by the students. Some implications were discussed concerning ways in which the process of internationalisation can be progressed in a more effective way.
- 23 January 2013
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Globalisation, Societies and Education
- Vol. 11 (3) , 359-378
Internationalisation of higher education curriculum: the contribution of international students
Internationalisation of Australian higher education was initially characterised as growth in the number of international students. While the economic benefits brought by this student cohort and the challenges associated with teaching them are well noted in the literature, their academic contributions are hardly acknowledged. Using a qualitative research approach, the paper explores the extent to which international students facilitate the internationalisation of the curriculum and the intercultural learning of domestic students. Interviews with academic staff in one university in Australia indicated that international students brought a diversity of cultures that inspired teachers in their teaching. While academic staff members positively value these potentials, they argued that domestic students remained neglectful and unaware of the changing cultural environment. It was a challenge for staff to get domestic students to utilise the cultural resources represented by the students. Some implications were discussed concerning ways in which the process of internationalisation can be progressed in a more effective way.
- 1 October 2011
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Intercultural Education
- Vol. 22 (5) , 381-394
Dealing with diversity in internationalised higher education institutions
While the economic benefits created by international education export are well documented, few systematic and qualitative analysis studies have been conducted to examine how academic staff perceive the presence of international students in their institutions. Using interview data from 80 academic staff from different disciplines in one higher institution in Australia, this study examines whether the presence of international students has an impact on staff teaching practice. Some of the academic staff reported that they made no adjustments to their teaching. They treated all students as one student group. Other staff members said that there have been changes in their teaching in response to the presence of international students in their classroom. The paper discusses some of the underlying causes of these responses, and implications for the practice of international education. The discussion of the findings is informed by Bennett’s Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity, which helps us understand how people respond to cultural differences.
- 1 October 2011
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Intercultural Education
- Vol. 22 (5) , 381-394
Dealing with diversity in internationalised higher education institutions
While the economic benefits created by international education export are well documented, few systematic and qualitative analysis studies have been conducted to examine how academic staff perceive the presence of international students in their institutions. Using interview data from 80 academic staff from different disciplines in one higher institution in Australia, this study examines whether the presence of international students has an impact on staff teaching practice. Some of the academic staff reported that they made no adjustments to their teaching. They treated all students as one student group. Other staff members said that there have been changes in their teaching in response to the presence of international students in their classroom. The paper discusses some of the underlying causes of these responses, and implications for the practice of international education. The discussion of the findings is informed by Bennett’s Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity, which helps us understand how people respond to cultural differences.
- 20 August 2011
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 199-215
Globalization, Resources and Strategies: A Comparison of Universitas Indonesia and the Australian National University
- 20 August 2011
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 199-215
Globalization, Resources and Strategies: A Comparison of Universitas Indonesia and the Australian National University
- 25 February 2011
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal for Academic Development
- Vol. 16 (1) , 45-57
Academic staff response to international students and internationalising the curriculum: the impact of disciplinary differences
While extensive discussion has been devoted to internationalising the curriculum in a response to the presence of international students, little is known about how academic staff members perceive the presence of this student cohort. Using data collected through semi‐structured interviews with 80 academic staff from four different faculties in one higher education institution, this study investigates staff understanding regarding international students, with particular attention given to how disciplinary differences shape their responses. Findings indicate that staff from ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ disciplines hold different instructional beliefs, which then affect their teaching and learning practice. Discussions are provided on how these differing conceptions of teaching fit into the context of academic development with respect to international education.
- 25 February 2011
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal for Academic Development
- Vol. 16 (1) , 45-57
Academic staff response to international students and internationalising the curriculum: the impact of disciplinary differences
While extensive discussion has been devoted to internationalising the curriculum in a response to the presence of international students, little is known about how academic staff members perceive the presence of this student cohort. Using data collected through semi‐structured interviews with 80 academic staff from four different faculties in one higher education institution, this study investigates staff understanding regarding international students, with particular attention given to how disciplinary differences shape their responses. Findings indicate that staff from ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ disciplines hold different instructional beliefs, which then affect their teaching and learning practice. Discussions are provided on how these differing conceptions of teaching fit into the context of academic development with respect to international education.