PSPatrick J. Shea

Patrick J. Shea

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Patrick J. Shea has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • B.-T. Oh

    School of Natural Resource Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0758, USA

    1 shared publication
  • Byung-Taek Oh

    School of Natural Resource Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583–0758, USA

    1 shared publication
  • David S. Hage

    Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304

    1 shared publication
  • Galina K. Vasilyeva

    School of Natural Resource Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583-0758, USA

    1 shared publication
  • Gautam Sarath

    Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA

    1 shared publication
  • Jasbir Singh

    School of Natural Resource Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0758

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Pilot‐Scale Treatment of RDX‐Contaminated Soil with Zerovalent Iron

    by S. D. Comfort, P. J. Shea, T. A. Machacek, T. Satapanajaru

    Soils in Technical Area 16 at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) are severely contaminated from past explosives testing and research. Our objective was to conduct laboratory and pilot‐scale experiments to determine if zerovalent iron (Fe0) could effectively transform RDX (hexahydro‐1,3,5‐trinitro‐1,3,5‐triazine) in two LANL soils that differed in physicochemical properties (Soils A and B). Laboratory tests indicated that Soil A was highly alkaline and needed to be acidified [with H2SO4, Al2(SO4)3, or CH3COOH] before Fe0 could transform RDX. Pilot‐scale experiments were performed by mixing Fe0 and contaminated soil (70 kg), and acidifying amendments with a high‐speed mixer that was a one‐sixth replica of a field‐scale unit. Soils were kept unsaturated (soil water content = 0.30–0.34 kg kg−1) and sampled with time (0–120 d). While adding CH3COOH improved the effectiveness of Fe0 to remove RDX in Soil A (98% destruction), CH3COOH had a negative effect in Soil B. We believe that this difference is a result of high concentrations of organic matter and Ba. Adding CH3COOH to Soil B lowered pH and facilitated Ba release from BaSO4 or BaCO3, which decreased Fe0 performance by promoting flocculation of humic material on the iron. Despite problems encountered with CH3COOH, pilot‐scale treatment of Soil B (12100 mg RDX kg−1) with Fe0 or Fe0 + Al2(SO4)3 showed high RDX destruction (96–98%). This indicates that RDX‐contaminated soil can be remediated at the field scale with Fe0 and soil‐specific problems (i.e., alkalinity, high organic matter or Ba) can be overcome by adjustments to the Fe0 treatment.


  • POTENTIAL OF ACTIVATED CARBON TO DECREASE 2,4,6-TRINITROTOLUENE TOXICITY AND ACCELERATE SOIL DECONTAMINATION

    by Galina K. Vasilyeva, Vladimir D. Kreslavski, Byung-Taek Oh, Patrick J. Shea

    Activated carbon can be used to decrease 2,4,6‐trinitrotoluene (TNT) toxicity and promote bioremediation of highly contaminated soil. Adding activated carbon at 0.25, 0.75, and 1.0% (w/w) to Sharpsbu...


  • Iron-enhanced remediation of water and soil containing atrazine

    by Jasbir Singh, Patrick J. Shea, Lakhwinder S. Hundal, Steve D. Comfort, Tian C. Zhang, David S. Hage

    Atrazine is the most widely used herbicide in the U.S. and has been detected in surface water and groundwater. Technologies are needed for onsite and in situ remediation of water and soil containing atrazine. We investigated the potential of using fine-grained, zero-valent iron (Fe0) to remove atrazine and promote its degradation in contaminated water and soil. Atrazine loss from aqueous solution increased with increasing Fe0concentration (w/v). Agitating 20 μg14C-ring-labeled atrazine L−1with 10% Fe0(w/v) removed 92% of the14C from solution within 48 h. Only about 4% of the14C lost from solution was extractable from the iron with 3 mM CaCl2(readily available pool), 81% was extractable with CH3CN (potentially available pool), and 11% was unextractable residues. A companion experiment indicated that most of the14C extracted from the iron with 3 mM CaCl2after the 48-h Fe0treatment was unaltered atrazine, while the CH3CN extract contained approximately 33% atrazine and 48% was unidentified atrazine transformation products. Treating a highly contaminated solution (20 mg atrazine L−1) with 20% Fe0(w/v) removed 88% of the14C (added as14C-ring-labeled atrazine) from solution within 48 h. Deethylatrazine was the main atrazine transformation product detected in solution after treatment, but small amounts of deisopropylatrazine, didealkylatrazine, and hydroxyatrazine were also found. Treating Sharpsburg surface soil containing 1 mg atrazine kg−1with Fe0(2%, w/w) increased atrazine mineralization from 4.1 to 11.2% after 120 d. Pyrite (4% FeS2, w/w) also increased atrazine mineralization in surface soil, but was less effective in the presence of NO3−or SO42−(100 mg kg−1soil). Adding 2% Fe0(w/w) and 100 mg NO3−kg−1to contaminated subsurface soil increased atrazine mineralization from 0.4 to 8.2% within 120 d, and unextractable residues increased from 4.6 to 9.8%. These results indicate iron can sorb atrazine and promote its transformation in water and soil.