Donald E. Cutlip
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Donald E. Cutlip has a total of 25 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Ameet Bakhai
From the Harvard Clinical Research Institute (D.E.C., A.G.C., D.S.B., M.S.C., S.M., J.M., A.B., D.J.C., R.E.K., K.K.L.H.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.E.C., D.J.C., K.K.L.H.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital (D.S.B., R.E.K.), Boston, Mass; and Lahey Clinic (M.S.C.), Burlington, Mass
1 shared publication- Amit Chhabra
Medical Affairs, Pfizer, New York, New York
1 shared publication Christopher J. Cove
Cardiology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
1 shared publicationDavid J Cohen
1 shared publicationDavid J. Cohen
From the Harvard Clinical Research Institute (D.E.C., A.G.C., D.S.B., M.S.C., S.M., J.M., A.B., D.J.C., R.E.K., K.K.L.H.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.E.C., D.J.C., K.K.L.H.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital (D.S.B., R.E.K.), Boston, Mass; and Lahey Clinic (M.S.C.), Burlington, Mass
1 shared publicationDonald S Baim
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 31 October 2011
- Published by Elsevier in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 4 (10) , 1151-1152
Reply
- 31 October 2011
- Published by Elsevier in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 4 (10) , 1151-1152
Reply
- 7 September 2004
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 110 (10) , 1226-1230
Beyond Restenosis
Background— In the first year after coronary stent implantation, clinical failures are driven mainly by procedural complications and restenosis, but the subsequent relative contributions of restenosis and disease progression to late failures are less clear. Methods and Results— We observed 1228 patients for 5 years after the implantation of stents as part of pivotal second-generation coronary stent trials. Clinical events of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and repeat hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome or congestive heart failure were attributed to the index stented (target) lesion or other distinct sites (either in the target or other coronary vessels) and further classified as procedural, restenosis, or nonrestenosis. During the first year the hazard rate was 18.3% for target-lesion events and 12.4% for events unrelated to the target lesion. After the first year the average annual hazard rate was 1.7% for target-lesion events and 6.3% for nontarget-lesion events. By the fifth year, restenosis events occurred in 20.3% of patients, whereas 30-day procedural complications or later nonrestenosis events occurred in 37.9%, including 11.4% who also experienced a restenosis event, for a combined cumulative event rate of 46.4%. Diabetes mellitus and multivessel disease were independently associated with increased risk for both restenosis and nonrestenosis events. Conclusion— In a low-risk clinical trial population, the clinical outcome beyond 1 year after stenting is determined by a high rate of events related to disease progression in segments other than the stented lesion, which itself remains relatively stable.
- 7 September 2004
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 110 (10) , 1226-1230
Beyond Restenosis
Background— In the first year after coronary stent implantation, clinical failures are driven mainly by procedural complications and restenosis, but the subsequent relative contributions of restenosis and disease progression to late failures are less clear. Methods and Results— We observed 1228 patients for 5 years after the implantation of stents as part of pivotal second-generation coronary stent trials. Clinical events of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and repeat hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome or congestive heart failure were attributed to the index stented (target) lesion or other distinct sites (either in the target or other coronary vessels) and further classified as procedural, restenosis, or nonrestenosis. During the first year the hazard rate was 18.3% for target-lesion events and 12.4% for events unrelated to the target lesion. After the first year the average annual hazard rate was 1.7% for target-lesion events and 6.3% for nontarget-lesion events. By the fifth year, restenosis events occurred in 20.3% of patients, whereas 30-day procedural complications or later nonrestenosis events occurred in 37.9%, including 11.4% who also experienced a restenosis event, for a combined cumulative event rate of 46.4%. Diabetes mellitus and multivessel disease were independently associated with increased risk for both restenosis and nonrestenosis events. Conclusion— In a low-risk clinical trial population, the clinical outcome beyond 1 year after stenting is determined by a high rate of events related to disease progression in segments other than the stented lesion, which itself remains relatively stable.
- 24 October 2001
- Published by Wiley in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 54 (3) , 327-332
Evolution in the practice of primary angioplasty: effect of adjunctive coronary stenting and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors on long-term outcomes.
- 24 October 2001
- Published by Wiley in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 54 (3) , 327-332
Evolution in the practice of primary angioplasty: effect of adjunctive coronary stenting and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors on long-term outcomes.