Mary Riddel
Research Subjects
Mary Riddel has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
David Hales
Department of Economics University of California Santa Barbara Santa Barbara CA USA
2 shared publications- W. Douglass Shaw
Texas A&M University, College Station, USA
2 shared publications - David Bell
Research Analyst, Center on Global Change, Duke University, Box 90658, Durham, NC 27708–0658; formerly, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-2124
1 shared publication - Justin S. Baker
Research Analyst, Center on Global Change, Duke University, Box 90658, Durham, NC 27708–0658; formerly, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-2124
1 shared publication - Paul M. Jakus
Department of Applied Economics Utah State University Logan Utah USA
1 shared publication R. Keith Schwer
University of Nevada
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 16 May 2018
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 38 (10) , 2161-2177
Predicting Cancer‐Prevention Behavior: Disentangling the Effects of Risk Aversion and Risk Perceptions
Experimental and survey research spanning the last two decades concludes that people who are more risk tolerant are more likely to engage in risky health activities such as smoking and heavy alcohol consumption, and are more likely to be obese. Subjective perceptions of the risk associated with different activities have also been found to be associated with health behaviors. While there are numerous studies that link risk perceptions with risky behavior, it is notable that none of these controls for risk aversion. Similarly, studies that control for risk aversion fail to control for risk misperceptions. We use a survey of 474 men and women to investigate the influence of risk aversion, risk misperceptions, and cognitive ability on the choice to engage in behaviors that either increase or mitigate cancer risk. We measure optimism in two dimensions: baseline optimists are those who inaccurately believe their cancer risk to be below its expert‐assessed level, while control optimists are those who believe they can reduce their risk of cancer (by changing their lifestyle choices) to a greater extent than is actually the case. Our results indicate that baseline optimism is significantly and negatively correlated with subjects′ tendencies to engage in cancer‐risk‐reducing behaviors, and positively correlated with risky behaviors. Subjects’ control misperceptions also appear to play a role in their tendency to engage in risky and prevention behaviors. When controlling for both of these types of risk misperception, risk aversion plays a much smaller role in determining health behaviors than found in past studies.
- 16 May 2018
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 38 (10) , 2161-2177
Predicting Cancer‐Prevention Behavior: Disentangling the Effects of Risk Aversion and Risk Perceptions
Experimental and survey research spanning the last two decades concludes that people who are more risk tolerant are more likely to engage in risky health activities such as smoking and heavy alcohol consumption, and are more likely to be obese. Subjective perceptions of the risk associated with different activities have also been found to be associated with health behaviors. While there are numerous studies that link risk perceptions with risky behavior, it is notable that none of these controls for risk aversion. Similarly, studies that control for risk aversion fail to control for risk misperceptions. We use a survey of 474 men and women to investigate the influence of risk aversion, risk misperceptions, and cognitive ability on the choice to engage in behaviors that either increase or mitigate cancer risk. We measure optimism in two dimensions: baseline optimists are those who inaccurately believe their cancer risk to be below its expert‐assessed level, while control optimists are those who believe they can reduce their risk of cancer (by changing their lifestyle choices) to a greater extent than is actually the case. Our results indicate that baseline optimism is significantly and negatively correlated with subjects′ tendencies to engage in cancer‐risk‐reducing behaviors, and positively correlated with risky behaviors. Subjects’ control misperceptions also appear to play a role in their tendency to engage in risky and prevention behaviors. When controlling for both of these types of risk misperception, risk aversion plays a much smaller role in determining health behaviors than found in past studies.
- 28 October 2016
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Risk and Insurance
- Vol. 85 (3) , 749-785
RISK MISPERCEPTIONS AND SELECTION IN INSURANCE MARKETS: AN APPLICATION TO DEMAND FOR CANCER INSURANCE
- 28 October 2016
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Risk and Insurance
- Vol. 85 (3) , 749-785
RISK MISPERCEPTIONS AND SELECTION IN INSURANCE MARKETS: AN APPLICATION TO DEMAND FOR CANCER INSURANCE
- 17 March 2013
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
- Vol. 46 (2) , 191-213
Heterogeneity in life-duration preferences: Are risky recreationists really more risk loving?
- 17 March 2013
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
- Vol. 46 (2) , 191-213
Heterogeneity in life-duration preferences: Are risky recreationists really more risk loving?
- 7 September 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
- Vol. 45 (2) , 135-157
Comparing risk preferences over financial and environmental lotteries
- 7 September 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
- Vol. 45 (2) , 135-157
Comparing risk preferences over financial and environmental lotteries
- 6 December 2011
- Published by Wiley in Contemporary Economic Policy
- Vol. 30 (3) , 417-429
PERCEIVED ARSENIC‐RELATED MORTALITY RISKS FOR SMOKERS AND NON‐SMOKERS
- 6 December 2011
- Published by Wiley in Contemporary Economic Policy
- Vol. 30 (3) , 417-429
PERCEIVED ARSENIC‐RELATED MORTALITY RISKS FOR SMOKERS AND NON‐SMOKERS
- 1 August 2009
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Natural Hazards Review
- Vol. 10 (3) , 102-112
Explaining Subjective Risks of Hurricanes and the Role of Risks in Intended Moving and Location Choice Models
Using stated choice survey data we report on subjects’ perceptions of the risks of hurricanes and intended relocation decisions when faced with such risks. All of the subjects were displaced by either Hurricane Katrina or Rita, in New Orleans and other Gulf Coast areas in 2005. Results here suggest that subjective perceptions of risk are quite high as compared to scientific estimates of risk, and relocation decisions revealed from a discrete choice experiment are significantly determined by levels of hurricane strike risks.
- 1 August 2009
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Natural Hazards Review
- Vol. 10 (3) , 102-112
Explaining Subjective Risks of Hurricanes and the Role of Risks in Intended Moving and Location Choice Models
Using stated choice survey data we report on subjects’ perceptions of the risks of hurricanes and intended relocation decisions when faced with such risks. All of the subjects were displaced by either Hurricane Katrina or Rita, in New Orleans and other Gulf Coast areas in 2005. Results here suggest that subjective perceptions of risk are quite high as compared to scientific estimates of risk, and relocation decisions revealed from a discrete choice experiment are significantly determined by levels of hurricane strike risks.
- 1 January 2009
- Published by Wiley in Southern Economic Journal
- Vol. 75 (3) , 781-797
Risk Perception, Ambiguity, and Nuclear‐Waste Transport
- 1 January 2009
- Published by Wiley in Southern Economic Journal
- Vol. 75 (3) , 781-797
Risk Perception, Ambiguity, and Nuclear‐Waste Transport
- 1 June 2006
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental and Resource Economics
- Vol. 34 (2) , 317-338
Winners, Losers, and the Nuclear-Waste Dilemma
- 1 June 2006
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental and Resource Economics
- Vol. 34 (2) , 317-338
Winners, Losers, and the Nuclear-Waste Dilemma
- 1 March 2006
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
- Vol. 32 (2) , 131-150
A theoretically-consistent empirical model of non-expected utility: An application to nuclear-waste transport
- 1 March 2006
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
- Vol. 32 (2) , 131-150
A theoretically-consistent empirical model of non-expected utility: An application to nuclear-waste transport