Petar Risteski

Patients with severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) undergoing surgical coronary revascularization face elevated perioperative risk. We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery under prophylactic Impella 5.0/5.5 support at a single center between 2020 and 2023. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints were the change in LVEF to discharge, early graft patency on computed tomography angiography, duration of support, and device- and access-related complications. Twenty-one patients were included. Median age was 63 years (IQR 59–74), 19 (90.5%) were male, and median EuroSCORE II was 10.8% (IQR 7.8–17.8). Median preoperative LVEF was 20% (IQR 20–28). Complete revascularization was achieved in all patients, and none required intraoperative conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass. Median duration of Impella support was 4 days (IQR 2–7). Median LVEF at discharge was 38% (IQR 34–40), with a median within-patient change of +16 percentage points (IQR 10–20). Predischarge computed tomography angiography showed early graft failure in one patient (4.8%). Two patients (9.5%) required postoperative escalation to veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and 30-day mortality was 4.8% (n = 1). Impella 5.0/5.5-assisted OPCAB appears feasible in selected patients, with a complication profile that warrants further evaluation given the low number of patients enrolled. This uncontrolled series cannot establish a benefit attributable to Impella; prospective controlled evaluation is required.

Aortic aneurysms are complex, predominantly asymptomatic vascular diseases with distinct incidence patterns depending on anatomical localisation. The incidence of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) has moderately increased, whereas that of abdominal aortic aneurysms has declined, primarily due to public health measures. Undiagnosed or poorly managed aneurysms are at significant risk of progression to acute aortic syndrome, with high associated mortality. The embryological origins of the aorta may have a substantial impact on its structural, cellular, and functional heterogeneity. Specifically, smooth-muscle cells (SMCs) in the thoracic aorta are derived from cardiac neural crest and mesodermal cells, whereas abdominal aortic SMCs originate from the paraxial and splanchnic mesoderm. To explore these developmental and regional distinctions, we conducted a narrative review based on targeted literature retrieval and expert curation, highlighting how these distinctions might potentially influence susceptibility to aneurysms and their clinical presentation. Histological differences, such as the number of lamellar units and the presence or absence of vasa vasorum, could further explain regional vulnerability. Molecular mechanisms underlying aneurysm formation include inflammation, oxidative stress, extracellular matrix degradation, phenotypic switching, and dysregulated signalling pathways, notably transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) and angiotensin II. Genetic mutations significantly contribute to TAAs, with genes involved in the elastin–contractile unit and TGF-β signalling pathways playing pivotal roles. However, the complex interplay between genetic susceptibility and risk factors explains why some patients develop aneurysms while others do not. Clinical management strategies have evolved, emphasising early risk stratification, surveillance, and timely surgical intervention, guided increasingly by genetic profiling and segment-specific molecular understanding. Advances in genomic technologies, biomarker identification, and computational modelling promise to enhance individualised care. Bridging developmental biology, molecular genetics, and clinical practice is crucial for improving outcomes in patients with aortic aneurysms, thereby reinforcing a multidisciplinary approach to patient-centred cardiovascular medicine.

Aortic surgery is one of the most challenging areas in cardiovascular medicine because of the complexity of the procedure and the potential for life-threatening complications. Historically, median sternotomy has been the gold-standard approach for thoracic aortic interventions, providing excellent exposure to the entire ascending aorta and the distal aortic arch. This approach has yielded satisfactory postoperative results over the years. However, the invasiveness of median sternotomy is associated with significant surgical trauma, increased postoperative pain and prolonged recovery. Minimally invasive aortic surgery has emerged as a potential alternative to conventional approaches with the aim of combining the benefits of minimally invasive cardiac surgery with the demands of complex aortic interventions. In this review, we aimed to critically analyse the current experiences with minimally invasive aortic surgery via partial upper sternotomy for the treatment of aortic root, ascending aorta and aortic arch pathologies. The partial upper sternotomy (PUS), as a less invasive approach in minimally invasive aortic surgery, represents a substantial advancement in the field of aortic surgery. The current literature on minimally invasive aortic surgery via PUS is predominantly based on retrospective, single-centre studies with small sample sizes, which limits the strength of the conclusions and generalisability. Ventilation time, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, length of hospital stay and bleeding complications can be reduced using this approach. Survival was not negatively affected and cosmetic results were improved by minimally invasive aortic surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Thoracic vascular graft infections are devastating complications after aortic surgery, entailing high mortality. The gold standard treatment combines excisional surgery and antimicrobial therapy, but patients deemed inoperable might benefit from a conservative approach. Outcomes of patients treated only with antimicrobial agents without reoperative surgery are scanty. We aim to describe patients’ characteristics and outcomes using an antibiotic-only strategy without thorough debridement. METHODS: Retrospectively collected data from a prospective cohort in a tertiary centre. Descriptive analysis for baseline characteristics and Kaplan–Meier estimates for survival were performed. RESULTS: From November 2012 to December 2022, 66 patients were identified with aortic root, ascending aortic and aortic arch graft infections. Of these, 44 received an antibiotic-only strategy or in combination with selective debridement after achieving multidisciplinary consensus. Median follow-up was 4.8 years [interquartile range (IQR) 1.7–6.1], and cumulative survival was 82.9% (CI 95%, 69.7–96.1). Streptococcus spp were the most common isolated microorganisms. CONCLUSIONS: In selected cases, a conservative approach with antibiotics only or in combination with selective debridement showed acceptable results at follow-up, suggesting a valuable therapy option for this cohort of patients.

Over the past two decades, minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has gained a significant place due to the emergence of innovative tools and improvements in surgical techniques, offering comparable efficacy and safety to traditional surgical methods. This review provides an overview of the history of MICS, its current state, and its prospects and highlights its advantages and limitations. Additionally, we highlight the growing trends and potential pathways for the expansion of MICS, underscoring the crucial role of technological advancements in shaping the future of this field. Recognizing the challenges, we strive to pave the way for further breakthroughs in minimally invasive cardiac procedures.

Background and Objectives: To analyze the patient outcome and complication rate of axillary artery cannulation for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in patients who could not be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass after cardiothoracic surgery. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the data of 179 patients who were supported with VA-ECMO with femoral–axillary access (FA VA-ECMO) after cardiothoracic surgery between January 2014 and January 2019 in our department. Patients requiring central aortic cannulation and patients with respiratory failure requiring veno-venous ECMO were excluded. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 1-year survival rate of patients who were weaned from VA-ECMO support. Secondary outcomes were cannulation-related complications at the axillary site, VA-ECMO-related complications, and systemic complications. Results: In our cohort, 60 (33.5%) patients were female. Mean age was 67.0 ± 10.9 years. Overall, 78 (43.5%) patients were operated upon electively, 37 (20.7%) patients underwent urgent surgery, and 64 (35.8%) patients underwent emergency surgical treatment. Sixty-seven patients (37.4%) were resuscitated preoperatively. The mean duration of VA-ECMO support was 8.4 ± 5.1 days. Weaning from VA-ECMO was successful in 87 (48.6%) patients; 62 (34.6%) patients survived the hospital stay. The 1-year survival rate was 74%. Subclavian bleeding occurred in 24 (13.4%) patients, femoral bleeding in 4 (2.2%) patients, ischemia of the upper limb in 11 (6.1%) patients, intracerebral bleeding in 9 (5%) patients, and stroke in 19 (10.6%) patients. Conclusions: In patients with acute LV dysfunction after cardiothoracic surgery who cannot be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass, right axillary artery cannulation is a safe and reliable method for VA-ECMO support with an acceptable complication rate.

Background and Objectives: The role of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on postoperative left ventricular (LV) function in patients with preoperatively preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is still being discussed and only a few studies address this question. This study aimed to assess LV function after CABG in patients with preoperatively preserved LVEF using left ventricular longitudinal strain assessed by 2D speckle tracking imaging (STI). Materials and Methods: Fifty-nine consecutive adult patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) referred for a first-time elective CABG surgery were enrolled in the final analysis of this prospective single-center clinical study. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), with conventional measures and STI measures, was performed within 1 week before CABG as well as 4 months after surgery. Patients were divided into groups based on their preoperative global longitudinal strain (GLS) value. Differences in systolic and diastolic parameters between groups were analyzed. Results: Preoperative GLS was reduced (GLS < −17%) in 39% of the patients. Parameters of systolic LV function were significantly reduced in this group of patients compared to the patient group with GLS% ≥ −17%. In both groups, 4 months after CABG there was a decline in LVEF but statistically significant only in the group with GLS% ≥ −17% (p = 0.035). In patients with reduced GLS, there was a statistically significant postoperative improvement (p = 0.004). In patients with preoperative normal GLS, there was not a significant change in any strain parameters after CABG. There was an improvement in diastolic function parameters measured by Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) in both groups. Conclusions: There is improvement in LV systolic and diastolic function after CABG in patients with preserved preoperative LVEF measured by STI and TDI. GLS might be more sensitive and effective than LVEF for monitoring improvements in myocardial function after CABG surgery in patients with preserved LVEF.

Background The aim of the study was to assess the indications, surgical strategies, and outcomes after reoperative aortic arch surgery performed generally under mild hypothermia. Methods Ninety consecutive patients (60 males, mean age, 55 ± 16 years) underwent open reoperative aortic arch surgery after previous cardiac aortic surgery. The indications included chronic-progressive arch aneurysm (55.5%), chronic aortic dissection (17.8%), contained arch rupture (16.7%), and graft infection (10%). The reoperation was performed through a repeat sternotomy (96%) or clamshell thoracotomy (4%) using antegrade cerebral perfusion under mild systemic hypothermia (28.9 ± 2.5°C) in all except three patients. Results The surgery comprised hemiarch or total arch replacement in 41 (46%) and 49 (54%) patients, respectively. The distal extension included classic or frozen elephant trunk technique, each in 12 patients, and total descending aorta replacement in 4 patients. Operative mortality was 6 (6.7%) among all patients, with age identified as the only independent predictor of operative mortality (p = 0.05). Permanent and transient neurologic deficits occurred in 1% and 9% of the patients, respectively. Estimated survival at 8 years was 59 ± 8% with advanced heart failure predictive for late mortality (p = 0.014). Freedom from second reoperation or intervention on the aorta was 78 ± 6% at 8 years, with most of these events occurring downstream in patients with chronic degenerative aneurysms. Conclusion Aortic arch reoperations performed using antegrade cerebral perfusion under mild systemic hypothermia offer favorable operative outcomes with an exceptionally low rate of neurologic morbidity without any difference between hemiarch and complex arch procedures.

Background: Reports of minimal invasive aortic arch surgery are scarce. We reviewed our experience with minimal access aortic arch surgery performed through an upper mini-sternotomy, with emphasis on details of operative technique and early and mid-term outcomes. Methods: The medical records of 123 adult patients (mean age 66 ± 12 years), who underwent primary elective minimal access aortic arch surgery in two aortic referral centers, were reviewed. The most common indication was degenerative aortic arch aneurysm in 92 (75%) patients. Standard operative and organ protection techniques used in all patients were upper mini-sternotomy, uninterrupted antegrade cerebral perfusion, and moderate systemic hypothermia (27.4 ± 1°C). Results: Sixty-eight (55%) patients received partial aortic arch replacement; the remaining 55 (45%) patients received total arch replacement, further extended with either a frozen elephant trunk in 43 (35%) patients or a conventional elephant trunk procedure in nine (7%) patients. No conversion to full sternotomy was required. New permanent renal failure occurred in one (0.8%) patient, stroke in two (1.6%), and spinal cord injury in four (3.3%) patients. Early mortality was observed in four (3.3%) patients. At five years, survival was 80 ± 6% and freedom from reoperation was 96 ± 3%. Conclusion: Minimal invasive aortic arch repair through an upper mini-sternotomy can be safely performed, with early and mid-term outcomes well comparable to series performed through a standard median sternotomy.