Carl H. Schultz

Carl H. Schultz

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Carl H. Schultz has a total of 62 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Advancing Pediatric Stroke Readiness: Engaging Healthcare Systems to Optimize Care Delivery

    by Rachel Pearson, Stuart Fraser, Lisa Pabst, Maria M Galardi, Kristin Guilliams, Brian M Faux, Sarah Lee, Kriti Bhayana, Robin Novakovic-White, Carl H Schultz, et al.

    Stroke is less common in children than in adults, yet equally devastating. Nevertheless, children with symptoms of acute stroke commonly present to community hospitals or adult stroke centers where experience and institutional protocols for pediatric stroke diagnosis and management may be limited. Despite advances in pediatric stroke awareness and the implementation of stroke pathways in many children’s hospitals, significant gaps remain in the timely recognition, diagnosis, and management of pediatric stroke. A key contributing factor is the lack of system-level infrastructure to guide pediatric acute stroke care. This special report examines the challenges and barriers to achieving Pediatric Stroke Readiness at a national level in the United States and presents 5 engagement case studies highlighting efforts to establish processes and networks for pediatric stroke management across diverse care settings. The cases emphasize the development and implementation of systems of care in which pediatric stroke centers collaborate with first responders, community hospitals, and adult stroke centers to improve the delivery of acute stroke care for children. The strategies underscore different engagement approaches and identify opportunities for future research and quality improvement. These case studies also illustrate educational materials and clinical pathways that may serve as resources for others pursuing similar initiatives.

  • Open Access

    Accelerating the Transition to Green Building Neighbourhoods: A New Decision Support Platform

    by Henri Sohier, Carl Schultz, Yazan Zayed, Aliakbar Kamari, Luc Jonveaux, Kostas Zavitsas, Georgia Pantelide, Joaquin Trinanes, Asier Alejandre, Jessica Mberi, et al.

    Green Building Neighbourhoods (GBNs) foster sustainable, accessible, low‐carbon living through shared energy, green mobility, and social cohesion. Steering a neighbourhood towards GBN status faces hurdles in governance, financing, citizen engagement, technological innovation, and accessible tools. Current rapidly evolving digital technologies, such as BIM and Digital Twins, accelerate this transition by offering real-time tracking and visibility, fostering better coordination among stakeholders and facilitating early issue detection. The emerging advanced decision intelligence and digital decisioning platforms incorporate artificial intelligence (AI), analytics, and large datasets. This integration enables automation, optimisation, and the consistent delivery of data-driven decisions across various ecosystems. We report on the development of a novel Decision Support Platform (DSP) within the EU H2020 PROBONO project. The PROBONO DSP is iteratively tested in six “Living Labs” in Madrid, Dublin, Brussels, Aarhus, Porto, and Prague, each at different life‐cycle stages and seeking to address themes such as energy, emissions, mobility, and health. Key functionality includes digitalizing social values in BIM, large‐scale scenario sampling, thermal‐comfort simulation and monitoring, mobility benchmarking, anomaly detection, and energy‐investment comparison. Deployment in the Living Labs has enhanced information sharing, ideation, and stakeholder discussion through concise overviews and tailored recommendations. Modular integration has enabled emergent features.


  • Open Access

    The 2023 Model Core Content of Disaster Medicine

    by Bryan J. Wexler, Carl Schultz, Paul D. Biddinger, Gregory Ciottone, Angela Cornelius, Robert Fuller, Roxanna Lefort, Andrew Milsten, James Phillips, Ira Nemeth

    Introduction: Disaster Medicine (DM) is the clinical specialty whose expertise includes the care and management of patients and populations outside conventional care protocols. While traditional standards of care assume the availability of adequate resources, DM practitioners operate in situations where resources are not adequate, necessitating a modification in practice. While prior academic efforts have succeeded in developing a list of core disaster competencies for emergency medicine residency programs, international fellowships, and affiliated health care providers, no official standardized curriculum or consensus has yet been published to date for DM fellowship programs based in the United States.Study Objective: The objective of this work is to define the core curriculum for DM physician fellowships in the United States, drawing consensus among existing DM fellowship directors.Methods: A panel of DM experts was created from the members of the Council of Disaster Medicine Fellowship Directors. This council is an independent group of DM fellowship directors in the United States that have met annually at the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP)’s Scientific Assembly for the last eight years with meeting support from the Disaster Preparedness and Response Committee. Using a modified Delphi technique, the panel members revised and expanded on the existing Society of Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) DM fellowship curriculum, with the final draft being ratified by an anonymous vote. Multiple publications were reviewed during the process to ensure all potential topics were identified.Results: The results of this effort produced the foundational curriculum, the 2023 Model Core Content of Disaster Medicine.Conclusion: Members from the Council of Disaster Medicine Fellowship Directors have developed the 2023 Model Core Content for Disaster Medicine in the United States. This living document defines the foundational curriculum for DM fellowships, providing the basis of a standardized experience, contributing to the development of a board-certified subspecialty, and informing fellowship directors and DM practitioners of content and topics that may appear on future certification examinations.


  • Open Access

    The Natural History of Stingray Injuries

    by Robert J. Katzer, Carl Schultz, Kevin Pham, Micaela A. Sotelo

    Introduction: Stingray envenomation is a marine injury suffered by ocean goers throughout the world. No prospective studies exist on the various outcomes associated with these injuries.Study Objective: The aim of this study was to perform a prospective, observational study of human stingray injuries to determine the natural history, acute and subacute complications, prevalence of medical evaluation, and categories of medical treatment.Methods: This study prospectively studied a population of subjects who were injured by stingrays at Seal Beach, California (USA) from July 2012 through September 2016 and did not immediately seek emergency department evaluation. Subjects described their initial injury and provided information on their symptoms, medical evaluations, and medical treatment for the injury at one week and one month after the injury. This information was reported as descriptive statistics.Results: A total of 393 participants were enrolled in the study; 313 (80%) of those completed the one-week follow-up interview and 279 (71%) participants completed both the one-week and one-month follow-up interviews. Overall, 234 (75%) injuries occurred to the foot. One hundred sixty-three (52%) patients had complete resolution of their pain within one week and 261 (94%) had either complete resolution or improvement of pain by one month. Sixty-eight (22%) subjects reported being evaluated by a physician and a total of 49 (17%) subjects reported antibiotic treatment for their wound. None of the subjects required parenteral antibiotics or hospital admission.Conclusion: The majority of stingray victims recover from stingray injury without requiring antibiotics. A subset of subjects will have on-going wound pain after one month. The need for parenteral antibiotics or hospital admission is rare.


  • Open Access

    The Risk of Cancer from CT Scans and Other Sources of Low-Dose Radiation: A Critical Appraisal of Methodologic Quality

    by Carl H. Schultz, Romeo Fairley, Linda Suk-Ling Murphy, Mohan Doss

    Introduction: Concern exists that radiation exposure from computerized tomography (CT) will cause thousands of malignancies. Other experts share the same perspective regarding the risk from additional sources of low-dose ionizing radiation, such as the releases from Three Mile Island (1979; Pennsylvania USA) and Fukushima (2011; Okuma, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan) nuclear power plant disasters. If this premise is false, the fear of cancer leading patients and physicians to avoid CT scans and disaster responders to initiate forced evacuations is unfounded.Study Objective: This investigation provides a quantitative evaluation of the methodologic quality of studies to determine the evidentiary strength supporting or refuting a causal relationship between low-dose radiation and cancer. It will assess the number of higher quality studies that support or question the role of low-dose radiation in oncogenesis.Methods: This investigation is a systematic, methodologic review of articles published from 1975–2017 examining cancer risk from external low-dose x-ray and gamma radiation, defined as less than 200 millisievert (mSv). Following the PRISMA guidelines, the authors performed a search of the PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Methodologies of selected articles were scored using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) and a tool identifying 11 lower quality indicators. Manuscript methodologies were ranked as higher quality if they scored no lower than seven out of nine on the NOS and contained no more than two lower quality indicators. Investigators then characterized articles as supporting or not supporting a causal relationship between low-dose radiation and cancer.Results: Investigators identified 4,382 articles for initial review. A total of 62 articles met all inclusion/exclusion criteria and were evaluated in this study. Quantitative evaluation of the manuscripts’ methodologic strengths found 25 studies met higher quality criteria while 37 studies met lower quality criteria. Of the 25 studies with higher quality methods, 21 out of 25 did not support cancer induction by low-dose radiation (P = .0003).Conclusions: A clear preponderance of articles with higher quality methods found no increased risk of cancer from low-dose radiation. The evidence suggests that exposure to multiple CT scans and other sources of low-dose radiation with a cumulative dose up to 100 mSv (approximately 10 scans), and possibly as high as 200 mSv (approximately 20 scans), does not increase cancer risk.


  • Core Disaster Medicine Education (CDME) for Emergency Medicine Residents in the United States

    by Ritu R. Sarin, Paul Biddinger, John Brown, Jonathan L. Burstein, Frederick M. Burkle, Douglas Char, Gregory Ciottone, John L. Hick, Kristi L. Koenig, Charles Little, et al.

    Objectives: Disaster Medicine (DM) education for Emergency Medicine (EM) residents is highly variable due to time constraints, competing priorities, and program expertise. The investigators’ aim was to define and prioritize DM core competencies for EM residency programs through consensus opinion of experts and EM professional organization representatives.Methods: Investigators utilized a modified Delphi methodology to generate a recommended, prioritized core curriculum of 40 DM educational topics for EM residencies.Results: The DM topics recommended and outlined for inclusion in EM residency training included: patient triage in disasters, surge capacity, introduction to disaster nomenclature, blast injuries, hospital disaster mitigation, preparedness, planning and response, hospital response to chemical mass-casualty incident (MCI), decontamination indications and issues, trauma MCI, disaster exercises and training, biological agents, personal protective equipment, and hospital response to radiation MCI.Conclusions: This expert-consensus-driven, prioritized ranking of DM topics may serve as the core curriculum for US EM residency programs.


  • A Qualitative Analysis of the Spontaneous Volunteer Response to the 2013 Sudan Floods: Changing the Paradigm

    by Amin Albahari, Carl H. Schultz

    Introduction: While the concept of community resilience is gaining traction, the role of spontaneous volunteers during the initial response to disasters remains controversial. In an attempt to resolve some of the debate, investigators examined the activities of a spontaneous volunteer group called Nafeer after the Sudan floods around the city of Khartoum in August of 2013.Hypothesis: Can spontaneous volunteers successfully initiate, coordinate, and deliver sustained assistance immediately after a disaster?Methods: This retrospective, descriptive case study involved: (1) interviews with Nafeer members that participated in the disaster response to the Khartoum floods; (2) examination of documents generated during the event; and (3) subsequent benchmarking of their efforts with the Sphere Handbook. Members who agreed to participate were requested to provide all documents in their possession relating to Nafeer. The response by Nafeer was then benchmarked to the Sphere Handbook’s six core standards, as well as the 11 minimum standards in essential health services.Results: A total of 11 individuals were interviewed (six from leadership and five from active members). Nafeer’s activities included: food provision; delivery of basic health care; environmental sanitation campaigns; efforts to raise awareness; and construction and strengthening of flood barricades. Its use of electronic platforms and social media to collect data and coordinate the organization’s response was effective. Nafeer adopted a flat-management structure, dividing itself into 14 committees. A Coordination Committee was in charge of liaising between all committees. The Health and Sanitation Committee supervised two health days which included mobile medical and dentistry clinics supported by a mobile laboratory and pharmacy. The Engineering Committee managed to construct and maintain flood barricades. Nafeer used crowd-sourcing to fund its activities, receiving donations locally and internationally using supporters outside Sudan. Nafeer completely fulfilled three of Sphere’s core standards and partially fulfilled the other three, but none of the essential health services standards were fulfilled. Even though the Sphere Handbook was chosen as the best available “gold standard” to benchmark Nafeer’s efforts, it showed significant limitations in effectively measuring this group.Conclusion: It appears that independent spontaneous volunteer initiatives, like Nafeer, potentially can improve community resilience and play a significant role in the humanitarian response. Such organizations should be the subject of increased research activity. Relevant bodies should consider issuing separate guidelines supporting spontaneous volunteer organizations. Albahari A , Schultz CH . A qualitative analysis of the spontaneous volunteer response to the 2013 Sudan floods: changing the paradigm. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(3):240–248.


  • Preparing an Academic Medical Center to Manage Patients Infected With Ebola: Experiences of a University Hospital

    by Carl H. Schultz, Kristi L. Koenig, Wajdan Alassaf

    As Ebola has spread beyond West Africa, the challenges confronting health care systems with no experience in managing such patients are enormous. Not only is Ebola a significant threat to a population’s health, it can infect the medical personnel trying to treat it. As such, it represents a major challenge to those in public health, emergency medical services (EMS), and acute care hospitals. Our academic medical center volunteered to become an Ebola Treatment Center as part of the US effort to manage the threat. We developed detailed policies and procedures for Ebola patient management at our university hospital. Both the EMS system and county public health made significant contributions during the development process. This article shares information about this process and the outcomes to inform other institutions facing similar challenges of preparing for an emerging threat with limited resources. The discussion includes information about management of (1) patients who arrive by ambulance with prior notification, (2) spontaneous walk-in patients, and (3) patients with confirmed Ebola who are interfacility transfers. Hospital management includes information about Ebola screening procedures, personal protective equipment selection and personnel training, erection of a tent outside the main facility, establishing an Ebola treatment unit inside the facility, and infectious waste and equipment management. Finally, several health policy considerations are presented. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2015;9:558–567)


  • In reply

    by Carl H. Schultz, George J. Annas