Carl Pomerance
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Carl Pomerance has a total of 53 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Richard Crandall
Center for Advanced Computation, Reed College, Portland, Oregon 97202
9 shared publications - Lola Thompson
Department of MathematicsOberlin CollegeOberlinOH44074U.S.A.
4 shared publications - Andreas Weingartner
Department of Mathematics, Southern Utah University, Cedar City, USA
3 shared publications - Paul Pollack
Department of Mathematics, University of Georgia, Athens, USA
3 shared publications - Daniel López-Aguayo
Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey 64849, N.L., Mexico
2 shared publications - Shanta Laishram
Stat-Math Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, New Delhi, India
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 14 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in The Ramanujan Journal
- Vol. 69 (2) , 31
Exceptions to the Erdős–Straus–Schinzel conjecture
- 14 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in The Ramanujan Journal
- Vol. 69 (2) , 31
Exceptions to the Erdős–Straus–Schinzel conjecture
- 29 December 2025
- Published by Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences in Acta Arithmetica
Fermat pseudoprimes
We give an upper bound for the distribution of base-a pseudoprimes that is uniform in the base and does not require coprimality to the base. In addition we show that there are infinitely many “near Carmichael numbers” meaning that they are pseudoprimes for a positive proportion of bases, but not all bases.
- 29 December 2025
- Published by Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences in Acta Arithmetica
Fermat pseudoprimes
We give an upper bound for the distribution of base-a pseudoprimes that is uniform in the base and does not require coprimality to the base. In addition we show that there are infinitely many “near Carmichael numbers” meaning that they are pseudoprimes for a positive proportion of bases, but not all bases.
- Open Access
Shifted-prime divisors
Let $ω^*(n)$ denote the number of divisors of $n$ that are shifted primes, that is, the number of divisors of $n$ of the form $p-1$, with $p$ prime. Studied by Prachar in an influential paper from 70 years ago, the higher moments of $ω^*(n)$ are still somewhat a mystery. This paper addresses these higher moments and considers other related problems.Open AccessShifted-prime divisors
Let $ω^*(n)$ denote the number of divisors of $n$ that are shifted primes, that is, the number of divisors of $n$ of the form $p-1$, with $p$ prime. Studied by Prachar in an influential paper from 70 years ago, the higher moments of $ω^*(n)$ are still somewhat a mystery. This paper addresses these higher moments and considers other related problems. - 22 August 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Number Theory
- Vol. 254, 169-183
An inequality related to the sieve of Eratosthenes
- 22 August 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Number Theory
- Vol. 254, 169-183
An inequality related to the sieve of Eratosthenes
- Open Access
An inequality related to the sieve of Eratosthenes
Let $Φ(x,y)$ denote the number of integers $n\in[1,x]$ free of prime factors $\le y$. We show that but for a few small cases, $Φ(x,y)<.6x/\log y$ when $y\le\sqrt{x}$.Open AccessAn inequality related to the sieve of Eratosthenes
Let $Φ(x,y)$ denote the number of integers $n\in[1,x]$ free of prime factors $\le y$. We show that but for a few small cases, $Φ(x,y)<.6x/\log y$ when $y\le\sqrt{x}$. - 25 November 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Combinatorica
- Vol. 42 (5) , 729-747
On the Critical Exponent for k-Primitive Sets
- 25 November 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Combinatorica
- Vol. 42 (5) , 729-747
On the Critical Exponent for k-Primitive Sets
- 12 October 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Mathematics
- Vol. 8 (2) , 634-639
On a nonintegrality conjecture
- 12 October 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Mathematics
- Vol. 8 (2) , 634-639
On a nonintegrality conjecture
- 17 July 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Mathematics
- Vol. 6 (4) , 1496-1504
Progress towards a nonintegrality conjecture
- 17 July 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Mathematics
- Vol. 6 (4) , 1496-1504
Progress towards a nonintegrality conjecture
- Open Access
Progress towards a nonintegrality conjecture
Given $r \in \mathbb{N}$, define the function $S_{r}: \mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{Q}$ by $S_{r}(n)=\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{k}{k+r} \binom{n}{k}$. In $2015$, the second author conjectured that there are infinitely many $r \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $S_{r}(n)$ is nonintegral for all $n \geq 1$, and proved that $S_{r}(n)$ is not an integer for $r \in \{2,3,4\}$ and for all $n \geq 1$. In $2016$, Florian Luca and the second author raised the stronger conjecture that for any $r \geq 1$, $S_{r}(n)$ is nonintegral for all $n \geq 1$. They proved that $S_{r}(n)$ is nonintegral for $r \in \{5,6\}$ and that $S_{r}(n)$ is not an integer for any $r \geq 2$ and $1 \leq n \leq r-1$. In particular, for all $r \geq 2$, $S_{r}(n)$ is nonintegral for at least $r-1$ values of $n$. In $2018$, the fourth author gave sufficient conditions for the nonintegrality of $S_{r}(n)$ for all $n \geq 1$, and derived an algorithm to sometimes determine such nonintegrality; along the way he proved that $S_{r}(n)$ is nonintegral for $r \in \{7,8,9,10\}$ and for all $n \geq 1$. By improving this algorithm we prove the conjecture for $r\le 22$. Our principal result is that $S_r(n)$ is usually nonintegral in that the upper asymptotic density of the set of integers $n$ with $S_r(n)$ integral decays faster than any fixed power of $r^{-1}$ as $r$ grows.Open AccessProgress towards a nonintegrality conjecture
Given $r \in \mathbb{N}$, define the function $S_{r}: \mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{Q}$ by $S_{r}(n)=\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{k}{k+r} \binom{n}{k}$. In $2015$, the second author conjectured that there are infinitely many $r \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $S_{r}(n)$ is nonintegral for all $n \geq 1$, and proved that $S_{r}(n)$ is not an integer for $r \in \{2,3,4\}$ and for all $n \geq 1$. In $2016$, Florian Luca and the second author raised the stronger conjecture that for any $r \geq 1$, $S_{r}(n)$ is nonintegral for all $n \geq 1$. They proved that $S_{r}(n)$ is nonintegral for $r \in \{5,6\}$ and that $S_{r}(n)$ is not an integer for any $r \geq 2$ and $1 \leq n \leq r-1$. In particular, for all $r \geq 2$, $S_{r}(n)$ is nonintegral for at least $r-1$ values of $n$. In $2018$, the fourth author gave sufficient conditions for the nonintegrality of $S_{r}(n)$ for all $n \geq 1$, and derived an algorithm to sometimes determine such nonintegrality; along the way he proved that $S_{r}(n)$ is nonintegral for $r \in \{7,8,9,10\}$ and for all $n \geq 1$. By improving this algorithm we prove the conjecture for $r\le 22$. Our principal result is that $S_r(n)$ is usually nonintegral in that the upper asymptotic density of the set of integers $n$ with $S_r(n)$ integral decays faster than any fixed power of $r^{-1}$ as $r$ grows.