Steffen Marburg
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Steffen Marburg has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Anil Kumar Gupta
Former Director, Advanced Materials and Processes Research Institute, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Hoshangabad Rd., Bhopal 462 064, India
1 shared publication Eric Lösche
MTU Friedrichshafen GmbH , 88045 Friedrichshafen, Germany
1 shared publicationHerwig Peters
School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, The University of New South Wales , Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia
1 shared publication- Manmohan Dass Goel
Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology
1 shared publication - Nicole Kessissoglou
UNSW Sydney
1 shared publication - Vasant Matsagar
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 October 2013
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
- Vol. 27 (5) , 540-549
Comparative Performance of Stiffened Sandwich Foam Panels under Impulsive Loading
Modeling and numerical simulation of foam sandwich panels subjected to impulsive loading are presented. The sandwich panels consist of steel sheets at front and back with two varieties of foam cores in between. Stiffeners are provided at the back sheet for improved response. The dynamic response of the stiffened steel plate (SSP), sandwich foam panel (SFP), and stiffened sandwich foam panel (SSFP) are compared. The foam material modeling accounts for elastic-plastic behavior with volumetric hardening. The finite element–based numerical simulation for dynamic analysis is performed using a combination of shell and solid elements for sheets and foam, respectively. Central point displacements caused from the impulsive load of peak pressure of 0.7 MPa and lasting for 15 ms applied uniformly to the sandwich panels are studied. The analysis is carried out with an objective of understanding the effects of foam thickness, type of foam, and the stiffener configurations. The results obtained indicate that the SSFP considerably increase the resistance to impulsive loading compared with the SSP and SFP.
- 1 October 2013
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
- Vol. 27 (5) , 540-549
Comparative Performance of Stiffened Sandwich Foam Panels under Impulsive Loading
Modeling and numerical simulation of foam sandwich panels subjected to impulsive loading are presented. The sandwich panels consist of steel sheets at front and back with two varieties of foam cores in between. Stiffeners are provided at the back sheet for improved response. The dynamic response of the stiffened steel plate (SSP), sandwich foam panel (SFP), and stiffened sandwich foam panel (SSFP) are compared. The foam material modeling accounts for elastic-plastic behavior with volumetric hardening. The finite element–based numerical simulation for dynamic analysis is performed using a combination of shell and solid elements for sheets and foam, respectively. Central point displacements caused from the impulsive load of peak pressure of 0.7 MPa and lasting for 15 ms applied uniformly to the sandwich panels are studied. The analysis is carried out with an objective of understanding the effects of foam thickness, type of foam, and the stiffener configurations. The results obtained indicate that the SSFP considerably increase the resistance to impulsive loading compared with the SSP and SFP.
- 1 June 2013
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 133 (6) , 3700-3705
Surface contributions to radiated sound power
This paper presents a method to identify the surface areas of a vibrating structure that contribute to the radiated sound power. The surface contributions of the structure are based on the acoustic radiation modes and are computed for all boundaries of the acoustic domain. The surface contributions are compared to the acoustic intensity, which is a common measure for near-field acoustic energy. Sound intensity usually has positive and negative values that correspond to energy sources and sinks on the surface of the radiating structure. Sound from source and sink areas partially cancel each other and only a fraction of the near-field acoustic energy reaches the far-field. In contrast to the sound intensity, the surface contributions are always positive and no cancelation effects exist. The technique presented here provides a method to localize the relevant radiating surface areas on a vibrating structure. To illustrate the method, the radiated sound power from a baffled square plate is presented.
- 1 June 2013
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 133 (6) , 3700-3705
Surface contributions to radiated sound power
This paper presents a method to identify the surface areas of a vibrating structure that contribute to the radiated sound power. The surface contributions of the structure are based on the acoustic radiation modes and are computed for all boundaries of the acoustic domain. The surface contributions are compared to the acoustic intensity, which is a common measure for near-field acoustic energy. Sound intensity usually has positive and negative values that correspond to energy sources and sinks on the surface of the radiating structure. Sound from source and sink areas partially cancel each other and only a fraction of the near-field acoustic energy reaches the far-field. In contrast to the sound intensity, the surface contributions are always positive and no cancelation effects exist. The technique presented here provides a method to localize the relevant radiating surface areas on a vibrating structure. To illustrate the method, the radiated sound power from a baffled square plate is presented.