Charles Goodwin
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Charles Goodwin has a total of 1 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Marjorie Harness Goodwin
University of California
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 21 January 2012
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Semiotica
- Vol. 2012 (191) , 257-286
Car talk: Integrating texts, bodies, and changing landscapes
Making use of videotaped recordings of interaction in cars filmed as middle class families pursue their daily activities, we examine some of the ways in which talk while driving includes as parts of its intrinsic organization ongoing attention to phenomena beyond the stream of speech. Important consideration is given to issues posed by the task of driving while talking about a seeable field in either the unfolding landscape or a textual artifact within the car itself. Of particular interest to our analysis is how such phenomena are attended to, collaboratively recognized, and incorporated into the ongoing organization of talk. This process involves making use of a range of resources including deictics, perceptual directives, address terms, pointings (C. Goodwin 2003), etc., to locate for others these phenomena, as well as forms of stance display that inform how the speaker aligns towards the event. Through their gaze direction, questions, and displays of understandings recipients can display their response to a noticing or reporting.
- 21 January 2012
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Semiotica
- Vol. 2012 (191) , 257-286
Car talk: Integrating texts, bodies, and changing landscapes
Making use of videotaped recordings of interaction in cars filmed as middle class families pursue their daily activities, we examine some of the ways in which talk while driving includes as parts of its intrinsic organization ongoing attention to phenomena beyond the stream of speech. Important consideration is given to issues posed by the task of driving while talking about a seeable field in either the unfolding landscape or a textual artifact within the car itself. Of particular interest to our analysis is how such phenomena are attended to, collaboratively recognized, and incorporated into the ongoing organization of talk. This process involves making use of a range of resources including deictics, perceptual directives, address terms, pointings (C. Goodwin 2003), etc., to locate for others these phenomena, as well as forms of stance display that inform how the speaker aligns towards the event. Through their gaze direction, questions, and displays of understandings recipients can display their response to a noticing or reporting.
- Open Access
- 2 September 2010
- Published by UNISINOS - Universidade do Vale do Rio Dos Sinos in Calidoscópio
- Vol. 8 (2) , 85-98
Multimodality in human interaction
Multimodalidade na interação humana
- 2 September 2010
- Published by UNISINOS - Universidade do Vale do Rio Dos Sinos in Calidoscópio
- Vol. 8 (2) , 85-98
Open AccessMultimodality in human interaction
Multimodalidade na interação humana
- 1 January 2006
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Text & Talk
- Vol. 26 (4-5) , 443-461
Retrospective and prospective orientation in the construction of argumentative moves
Analysis focuses on how utterances opposing another position in an argument are constructed with a simultaneous orientation to (a) the detailed structure of the prior utterance being opposed and (b) the future trajectories of action projected by that utterance, which the current utterance attempts to counter and intercept. Through such practices participants treat each other as cognitively complex, reflexive actors who are reshaping a contested, consequential social landscape through the choices they make as they build each next action. Data is drawn from a dispute between a father and his son who is just entering adolescence.
- 1 January 2006
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Text & Talk
- Vol. 26 (4-5) , 443-461
Retrospective and prospective orientation in the construction of argumentative moves
Analysis focuses on how utterances opposing another position in an argument are constructed with a simultaneous orientation to (a) the detailed structure of the prior utterance being opposed and (b) the future trajectories of action projected by that utterance, which the current utterance attempts to counter and intercept. Through such practices participants treat each other as cognitively complex, reflexive actors who are reshaping a contested, consequential social landscape through the choices they make as they build each next action. Data is drawn from a dispute between a father and his son who is just entering adolescence.