Aniket Saoji
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Aniket Saoji has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Abhijit Kulkarni
Advanced Bionics, 12740 San Fernando Rd., Sylmar, CA 91342, USA
1 shared publication Andrew Quick
1 shared publication- Anthony Spahr
Arizona State University, Lattie F. Coor Hall, Room 3462, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
1 shared publication - Dawn Burton Koch
Advanced Bionics LLC, Valencia, California, U.S.A.
1 shared publication Leonid Litvak
1 shared publication- Leonid M. Litvak
Advanced Bionics Corporation, Sylmar, California 91342, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 June 2014
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Otology & Neurotology
- Vol. 35 (5) , 803-809
Enhanced Hearing in Noise for Cochlear Implant Recipients
To demonstrate benefits for speech perception and everyday listening in quiet and in noise with a speech-enhancement strategy called ClearVoice, which was designed to improve listening in complex acoustic environments without compromising hearing in quiet. A 2-week randomized crossover design was used to evaluate ClearVoice in 46 adults unilaterally implanted with a CII/HiRes 90K cochlear implant who had at least 6 months experience with HiRes Fidelity 120 sound processing. Speech perception was assessed using the AzBio sentences presented in quiet, in speech-spectrum noise and in multitalker babble. Subjective listening benefit and strategy preference were assessed with a questionnaire. ClearVoice has 3 gain settings (low, medium, and high), each intended as a full-time listening option according to individual preference. Speech understanding after acute use of ClearVoice-low was compared with HiRes Fidelity 120 during an initial test session. Speech perception abilities were compared with HiRes Fidelity 120 after 2 weeks of exclusive use of ClearVoice-medium, and after 2 weeks of exclusive use of ClearVoice-high. During a fifth week, participants were fit with 3 programs for comparison (HiRes Fidelity 120, ClearVoice-medium, and ClearVoice-high), after which, they reported preference and everyday listening benefits via a questionnaire. ClearVoice significantly improved speech understanding in speech-spectrum noise and multitalker babble, did not compromise listening in quiet, was preferred for everyday listening, and provided improved hearing in real-life situations. ClearVoice improves hearing in noise for cochlear implant recipients who use HiRes Fidelity 120 sound processing.
- 1 June 2014
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Otology & Neurotology
- Vol. 35 (5) , 803-809
Enhanced Hearing in Noise for Cochlear Implant Recipients
To demonstrate benefits for speech perception and everyday listening in quiet and in noise with a speech-enhancement strategy called ClearVoice, which was designed to improve listening in complex acoustic environments without compromising hearing in quiet. A 2-week randomized crossover design was used to evaluate ClearVoice in 46 adults unilaterally implanted with a CII/HiRes 90K cochlear implant who had at least 6 months experience with HiRes Fidelity 120 sound processing. Speech perception was assessed using the AzBio sentences presented in quiet, in speech-spectrum noise and in multitalker babble. Subjective listening benefit and strategy preference were assessed with a questionnaire. ClearVoice has 3 gain settings (low, medium, and high), each intended as a full-time listening option according to individual preference. Speech understanding after acute use of ClearVoice-low was compared with HiRes Fidelity 120 during an initial test session. Speech perception abilities were compared with HiRes Fidelity 120 after 2 weeks of exclusive use of ClearVoice-medium, and after 2 weeks of exclusive use of ClearVoice-high. During a fifth week, participants were fit with 3 programs for comparison (HiRes Fidelity 120, ClearVoice-medium, and ClearVoice-high), after which, they reported preference and everyday listening benefits via a questionnaire. ClearVoice significantly improved speech understanding in speech-spectrum noise and multitalker babble, did not compromise listening in quiet, was preferred for everyday listening, and provided improved hearing in real-life situations. ClearVoice improves hearing in noise for cochlear implant recipients who use HiRes Fidelity 120 sound processing.
- 1 May 2008
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 123 (5_Suppleme) , 3055
Use of simultaneous stimulation to represent fine structure in cochlear implant processors
In cochlear implants, simultaneous stimulation of adjacent electrodes, can be used to shape the electric fields generated within the cochlea. For example, simultaneous in‐phase stimulation of nearby electrodes can be used to create activation patterns which may have maxima at locations that are intermediate to the locations of the stimulated electrodes.Psychophysically, such “virtual channels” give rise to intermediate pitch sensations. Simultaneous out‐of‐phase stimulation of two flanking electrodes in addition to the center electrode can be used to presumably produce more focused activation at the cost of larger overall stimulation currents. Forward masking patterns indicate that for sufficiently large compensation currents, such “focused” stimulation can lead to a more spatially contained excitation. In some cases, current focusing also could lead to sensations that are more tonal relative to monopolar. This presentation will review recent results obtained in our laboratories with both “virtual channel” and “focused” configurations. We will also address how both techniques can be used to better represent the within‐channel fine structure in a wearable sound processing strategy.
- 1 May 2008
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 123 (5_Suppleme) , 3055
Use of simultaneous stimulation to represent fine structure in cochlear implant processors
In cochlear implants, simultaneous stimulation of adjacent electrodes, can be used to shape the electric fields generated within the cochlea. For example, simultaneous in‐phase stimulation of nearby electrodes can be used to create activation patterns which may have maxima at locations that are intermediate to the locations of the stimulated electrodes.Psychophysically, such “virtual channels” give rise to intermediate pitch sensations. Simultaneous out‐of‐phase stimulation of two flanking electrodes in addition to the center electrode can be used to presumably produce more focused activation at the cost of larger overall stimulation currents. Forward masking patterns indicate that for sufficiently large compensation currents, such “focused” stimulation can lead to a more spatially contained excitation. In some cases, current focusing also could lead to sensations that are more tonal relative to monopolar. This presentation will review recent results obtained in our laboratories with both “virtual channel” and “focused” configurations. We will also address how both techniques can be used to better represent the within‐channel fine structure in a wearable sound processing strategy.