RGRussell L. Gruen

Russell L. Gruen

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Russell L. Gruen has a total of 106 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Wellbeing and Personal Safety

    by Russell L. Gruen, Amit Gupta, Nobhojit Roy

    Subjective wellbeing is affected by perceived personal safety, which is a consequence of various types of threats, their mitigation, and the way risk is portrayed. Using road transport injury in a civilian setting, the authors of this chapter show how injury prevention policies and organised systems of care improve health outcomes and quality of life in a community. The media plays crucial roles in the introduction of new laws and services and in shaping public perceptions. Valid instruments to measure community health and wellbeing are needed to guide the introduction of safety systems throughout the world.

  • Open Access

    Pre‐hospital freeze‐dried plasma for critical bleeding after trauma: A pilot randomized controlled trial

    by Biswadev Mitra, Ben Meadley, Stephen Bernard, Marc Maegele, Russell L. Gruen, Olivia Bradley, Erica M. Wood, Zoe K. McQuilten, Mark Fitzgerald, Toby St. Clair, et al.

    Objectives: Transfusion of a high ratio of plasma to packed red blood cells (PRBCs), to treat or prevent acute traumatic coagulopathy, has been associated with survival after major trauma. However, the effect of prehospital plasma on patient outcomes has been inconsistent. The aim of this pilot trial was to assess the feasibility of transfusing freeze‐dried plasma with red blood cells (RBCs) using a randomized controlled design in an Australian aeromedical prehospital setting.Methods: Patients attended by helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) paramedics with suspected critical bleeding after trauma managed with prehospital RBCs were randomized to receive 2 units of freeze‐dried plasma (Lyoplas N‐w) or standard care (no plasma). The primary outcome was the proportion of eligible patients enrolled and provided the intervention. Secondary outcomes included preliminary data on effectiveness, including mortality censored at 24 h and at hospital discharge, and adverse events.Results: During the study period of June 1 to October 31, 2022, there were 25 eligible patients, of whom 20 (80%) were enrolled in the trial and 19 (76%) received the allocated intervention. Median time from randomization to hospital arrival was 92.5 min (IQR 68–101.5 min). Mortality may have been lower in the freeze‐dried plasma group at 24 h (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.03–1.73) and at hospital discharge (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.24–2.27). No serious adverse events related to the trial interventions were reported.Conclusions: This first reported experience of freeze‐dried plasma use in Australia suggests prehospital administration is feasible. Given longer prehospital times typically associated with HEMS attendance, there is potential clinical benefit from this intervention and rationale for a definitive trial.


  • Open Access

    Heat-related mortality: an urgent need to recognise and record

    by Thomas Longden, Simon Quilty, Philip Haywood, Arnagretta Hunter, Russell Gruen


  • A checklist for trauma quality improvement meetings: A process improvement study

    by G.M. O’reilly, J. Mathew, N. Roy, A. Gupta, M. Joshipura, N. Sharma, B. Mitra, P.A. Cameron, M. Fahey, T. Howard, et al.


  • Open Access

    Organised trauma systems and designated trauma centres for improving outcomes in injured patients

    by Barclay Stewart, Timothy C Hardcastle, Andres M Rubiano, Russell L Gruen, Michael Mwandri

    This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects of organised trauma systems and designated trauma centres for improving outcomes in injured patients, specifically patient outcomes and adverse effects or harms.


  • Open Access

    A process evaluation accompanying an attempted randomized controlled trial of an evidence service for health system policymakers

    by Michael G Wilson, Jeremy M Grimshaw, R Brian Haynes, Steven E Hanna, Parminder Raina, Russell Gruen, Mathieu Ouimet, John N Lavis

    We developed an evidence service that draws inputs from Health Systems Evidence (HSE), which is a comprehensive database of research evidence about governance, financial and delivery arrangements within health systems and about implementation strategies relevant to health systems. Our goal was to evaluate whether, how and why a ‘full-serve’ evidence service increases the use of synthesized research evidence by policy analysts and advisors in the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care as compared to a ‘self-serve’ evidence service. We attempted to conduct a two-arm, 10-month randomized controlled trial (RCT), along with a follow-up qualitative process evaluation, but we terminated the RCT when we failed to reach our recruitment target. For the qualitative process evaluation we modified the original interview guide to allow us to explore the (1) factors influencing participation in the trial; (2) usage of HSE, factors explaining usage patterns, and strategies to increase usage; (3) participation in training workshops and use of other supports; and (4) views about and experiences with key HSE features. We terminated the RCT given our 15% recruitment rate. Six factors were identified by those who had agreed to participate in the trial as encouraging their participation: relevance of the study to participants’ own work; familiarity with the researchers; personal view of the importance of using research evidence in policymaking; academic background; support from supervisors; and participation of colleagues. Most reported that they never, infrequently or inconsistently used HSE and suggested strategies to increase its use, including regular email reminders and employee training. However, only two participants indicated that employee training, in the form of a workshop about finding and using research evidence, had influenced their use of HSE. Most participants found HSE features to be intuitive and helpful, although registration/sign-in and some page formats (particularly the advanced search page and detailed search results page) discouraged their use or did not optimize the user experience. The qualitative findings informed a re-design of HSE, which allows users to more efficiently find and use research evidence about how to strengthen or reform health systems or in how to get cost-effective programs, services and drugs to those who need them. Our experience with RCT recruitment suggests the need to consider changing the unit of allocation to divisions instead of individuals within divisions, among other lessons. This protocol for this study is published in Implementation Science and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( HHS/FHS REB 10–267 ).


  • Open Access

    Developing a targeted, theory-informed implementation intervention using two theoretical frameworks to address health professional and organisational factors: a case study to improve the management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department

    by Emma J. Tavender, Marije Bosch, Russell L. Gruen, Sally E. Green, Susan Michie, Sue E. Brennan, Jill J. Francis, Jennie L. Ponsford, Jonathan C. Knott, Sue Meares, et al.

    Despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines for the management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department (ED), variations in practice exist. Interventions designed to implement recommended behaviours can reduce this variation. Using theory to inform intervention development is advocated; however, there is no consensus on how to select or apply theory. Integrative theoretical frameworks, based on syntheses of theories and theoretical constructs relevant to implementation, have the potential to assist in the intervention development process. This paper describes the process of applying two theoretical frameworks to investigate the factors influencing recommended behaviours and the choice of behaviour change techniques and modes of delivery for an implementation intervention. A stepped approach was followed: (i) identification of locally applicable and actionable evidence-based recommendations as targets for change, (ii) selection and use of two theoretical frameworks for identifying barriers to and enablers of change (Theoretical Domains Framework and Model of Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organisations) and (iii) identification and operationalisation of intervention components (behaviour change techniques and modes of delivery) to address the barriers and enhance the enablers, informed by theory, evidence and feasibility/acceptability considerations. We illustrate this process in relation to one recommendation, prospective assessment of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) by ED staff using a validated tool. Four recommendations for managing mild traumatic brain injury were targeted with the intervention. The intervention targeting the PTA recommendation consisted of 14 behaviour change techniques and addressed 6 theoretical domains and 5 organisational domains. The mode of delivery was informed by six Cochrane reviews. It was delivered via five intervention components : (i) local stakeholder meetings, (ii) identification of local opinion leader teams, (iii) a train-the-trainer workshop for appointed local opinion leaders, (iv) local training workshops for delivery by trained local opinion leaders and (v) provision of tools and materials to prompt recommended behaviours. Two theoretical frameworks were used in a complementary manner to inform intervention development in managing mild traumatic brain injury in the ED. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the developed intervention is being evaluated in a cluster randomised trial, part of the Neurotrauma Evidence Translation (NET) program.


  • Citicoline (CDP-choline) for traumatic brain injury

    by Hannah Beatrix Tan, Jason Wasiak, Jeffrey V Rosenfeld, Tom J O'Donohoe, Russell L Gruen


  • Health system decision makers’ feedback on summaries and tools supporting the use of systematic reviews: a qualitative study

    by Moriah E Ellen, John N Lavis, Michael G Wilson, Jeremy Grimshaw, R Brian Haynes, Mathieu Ouimet, Parminder Raina, Russell Gruen

    Health system managers and policy makers need timely access to high quality, policy-relevant systematic reviews. Our objectives were to obtain managers' and policy makers' feedback about user-friendly summaries of systematic reviews and about tools related to supporting or assessing their use. Our interviews identified that participants prefer key messages up front, such as details regarding background, methods, and applicability, appreciate quality ratings, and prefer bullets and tables to paragraphs. There were mixed views about the relevance-assessment tool and positive views about the use-assessment tool. The findings can be used to support evidence-informed decision making among managers and policy makers.


  • Open Access

    Implementing evidence-based recommended practices for the management of patients with mild traumatic brain injuries in Australian emergency care departments: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

    by Marije Bosch, Joanne E McKenzie, Duncan Mortimer, Emma J Tavender, Jill J Francis, Sue E Brennan, Jonathan C Knott, Jennie L Ponsford, Andrew Pearce, Denise A O’cOnnor, et al.

    Mild head injuries commonly present to emergency departments. The challenges facing clinicians in emergency departments include identifying which patients have traumatic brain injury, and which patients can safely be sent home. Traumatic brain injuries may exist with subtle symptoms or signs, but can still lead to adverse outcomes. Despite the existence of several high quality clinical practice guidelines, internationally and in Australia, research shows inconsistent implementation of these recommendations. The aim of this trial is to test the effectiveness of a targeted, theory- and evidence-informed implementation intervention to increase the uptake of three key clinical recommendations regarding the emergency department management of adult patients (18 years of age or older) who present following mild head injuries (concussion), compared with passive dissemination of these recommendations. The primary objective is to establish whether the intervention is effective in increasing the percentage of patients for which appropriate post-traumatic amnesia screening is performed.