Alexander Kogan

Background: The leading causes of maternal mortality include respiratory failure, cardiovascular events, infections, and hemorrhages. The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as rescue therapy in the peripartum period for cardiopulmonary failure is expanding in critical care medicine.Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted on a nationwide cohort in Israel. During the 3‐year period, between September 1, 2019, and August 31, 2022, all women in the peripartum period who had been supported by ECMO for respiratory or circulatory failure at 10 large Israeli hospitals were identified. Indications for ECMO, maternal and neonatal outcomes, details of ECMO support, and complications were collected.Results: During the 3‐year study period, in Israel, there were 540 234 live births, and 28 obstetric patients were supported by ECMO, with an incidence of 5.2 cases per 100 000 or 1 case per 19 000 births (when excluding patients with COVID‐19, the incidence will be 2.5 cases per 100 000 births). Of these, 25 were during the postpartum period, of which 16 (64%) were connected in the PPD1, and 3 were during pregnancy. Eighteen patients (64.3%) were supported by V‐V ECMO, 9 (32.1%) by V‐A ECMO, and one (3.6%) by a VV‐A configuration. Hypoxic respiratory failure (ARDS) was the most common indication for ECMO, observed in 21 patients (75%). COVID‐19 was the cause of ARDS in 15 (53.7%) patients. The indications for the V‐A configuration were cardiomyopathy (3 patients), amniotic fluid embolism (2 patients), sepsis, and pulmonary hypertension. The maternal and fetal survival rates were 89.3% (n = 25) and 100% (n = 28). The average ECMO duration was 17.6 ± 18.6 days and the ICU stay was 29.8 ± 23.8 days. Major bleeding complications requiring surgical intervention were observed in one patient.Conclusions: The incidence of using ECMO in the peripartum period is low. The maternal and neonatal survival rates in patients treated with ECMO are high. These results show that ECMO remains an important treatment option for obstetric patients with respiratory and/or cardiopulmonary failure.

Severe respiratory failure caused by COVID-19 often requires mechanical ventilation, including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). In rare cases, lung transplantation (LTx) may be considered as a last resort. However, uncertainties remain about patient selection and optimal timing for referral and listing. This retrospective study analyzed patients with severe COVID-19 who were supported by veno-venous ECMO and listed for LTx between July 2020 and June 2022. Out of the 20 patients in the study population, four who underwent LTx were excluded. The clinical characteristics of the remaining 16 patients were compared, including nine who recovered and seven who died while awaiting LTx. The median duration from hospitalization to listing was 85.5 days, and the median duration on the waitlist was 25.5 days. Younger age was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of recovery without LTx after a median of 59 days on ECMO, compared to those who died at a median of 99 days. In patients with severe COVID-19-induced lung damage supported by ECMO, referral to LTx should be delayed for 8–10 weeks after ECMO initiation, particularly for younger patients who have a higher probability of spontaneous recovery and may not require LTx.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 is an independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF). Surgical ablation or "maze procedure" is an option for patients with AF undergoing concomitant or isolated cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of DM type 2 on early and long-term outcomes of patients following surgical AF ablation. We performed an observational cohort study in Israel’s largest tertiary care center. All data of patients who underwent surgical AF ablation, between 2006 and 2021 were extracted from our departmental database. Patients were divided into Group I (non-diabetic patients) and Group II (DM type 2 patients). We compared the two groups with respect to freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia, and mortality rate. The study population included 606 patients. Group I (non-DM patients), consisting of 484 patients, and Group II (DM type 2 patients), comprised 122 patients. Patients with DM were older, had more hypertension and incidence of cerebrovascular accident (CVA)/transient ischemic attack (TIA), higher EuroSCORE (p < .05 for all), and a longer bypass time—130 ± 40 vs. 122 ± 36 min (p = 0.028). The mean follow-up duration was 39.0 ± 22.7 months. Freedom from atrial fibrillation was similar between the non-DM and DM type 2 groups after a 1-year follow-up, 414 (88.2%) vs. 101 (87.1%) (p = 0.511), after a 3-year follow-up, 360 (86.3%) vs. 84 (79.9%) (p = 0.290) and after a 5-year follow-up, 226 (74.1%) vs. 55 (71.5%) (p = 0.622) respectively. Furthermore, 1- and 3-year mortality was similar between non-DM and DM type 2 groups, 2.5% vs. 4.9%, (p = 0.226) and 5.6% vs. 10.5% (p = 0.076) respectively. 5-year mortality was higher in Group II (DM type 2 patients) compared with Group I (non-DM patients), 11.1% vs. 23.4% (p = 0.009). Surgical ablation had a high success rate, with freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia at 1- 3- and 5- years follow-up in both the DM type 2 and non-DM groups. Furthermore,1- and 3-year mortality after surgical ablation was also similar in both groups. However, 5-year mortality was higher in the DM type 2 group.

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF). Surgical ablation or "maze procedure" is an option for patients with (AF) undergoing concomitant or isolated cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of DM on early and long-term outcomes of patients following surgical AF ablation. Methods: We performed an observational cohort study in Israel’s largest tertiary care center. All data of patients who underwent surgical AF ablation, between 2006 and 2021 were extracted from our departmental database. Patients were divided into Group I (non-diabetic patients) and Group II (diabetic patients). We compared the two groups with respect to freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia, and mortality rate. Results: The study population included 606 patients. Group I (non-DM patients), consisting of 484 patients, and Group II (DM type 2 patients), comprised 122 patients. Patients with DM were older, had more hypertension and incidence of cerebrovascular accident (CVA)/transient ischemic attack (TIA), higher EuroSCORE (p <.05 for all), and a longer bypass time - 130±40 vs. 122±36 min (p=0.028). The mean follow-up duration was 39.0 ± 22.7 months. Freedom from atrial fibrillation was similar between the non-DM and DM groups after a 1-year follow-up, 414 (88.2%) vs. 101 (87.1%) (p = 0.511), after a 3-year follow-up, 360 (86.3%) vs. 84 (79.9%) (p = 0.290) and after a 5-year follow-up, 226 (74.1%) vs. 55 (71.5%) (p = 0.622) respectively. Furthermore, 1- and 3-year mortality was similar between non-DM and DM groups, 2.5% vs. 4.9%, (p = 0.226) and 5.6% vs. 10.5% (p = 0.076) respectively. 5-year mortality was higher in Group II (DM patients) compared with Group I (non-DM patients), 11.1% vs. 23.4% (p = 0.009). Conclusion: Surgical ablation had a high success rate, with freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia at 1- 3- and 5- years follow-up in both the DM and non-DM groups. Furthermore,1- and 3-year mortality after surgical ablation was also similar in both groups. However, 5-year mortality was higher in the DM group.

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is a frequent co-morbidity among patients suffering from infective endocarditis (IE). The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of type 2 DM on the early-, intermediate- and long-term mortality of patients who underwent surgical treatment of endocarditis. Methods: We performed an observational cohort study in the large tertiary center in Israel during 14 years. All data of patients who underwent surgical treatment of endocarditis, performed between 2006 and 2020 were extracted from the departmental database. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I (non-diabetic patients), and Group II (diabetic patients). Results: The study population includes 420 patients. Group I (non-diabetic patients), comprise 326 patients, and Group II (diabetic patients), comprise 94 patients. Mean follow-up duration was 39.3 ± 28.1 months. Short-term, 30-day and in-hospital mortality, also intermediate-term mortality (1- and 3-year) was higher in the DM group compared with the non-DM group, but did not reach statistical significance: 11.7% vs. 7.7%. (p = 0.215); 12.8% vs. 8.3% (p = 0.285); 20.2% vs. 13.2% (p = 0.1) and 23.4% vs. 15.6% (p = 0.09) respectively. Long-term, 5-year mortality was significantly higher in the DM group, compared to the non-DM group: 30.9% vs. 16.6% (p = 0.003). Furthermore, predictors for long-term mortality included diabetes (CI 1.056–2.785, p = 0.029), as demonstrated by regression analysis. Conclusions: Diabetic patients have trend to increasing mortality at the short- and intermediate period post-surgery for IE, but this is not statistically significant. Survival of diabetic patients deteriorates after more than three years follow surgery. Diabetes is an independent predictor for long-term, 5-year mortality after surgical treatment of endocarditis, regardless of the patients age and comorbidities. Trial registration Ethical Committee of Sheba Medical Centre, Israel on 02.12. 2014, Protocol 4257

BackgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is a frequent co-morbidity among patients suffering from infective endocarditis (IE). The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of type 2 DM on the early-, intermediate- and long-term mortality of patients who underwent surgical treatment of endocarditis.MethodsWe performed an observational cohort study in the large tertiary center in Israel during 14 years. All data of patients who underwent surgical treatment of endocarditis, performed between 2006 and 2020 were extracted from the departmental database. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I (non-diabetic patients), and Group II (diabetic patients).ResultsThe study population includes 420 patients. Group I (non-diabetic patients), comprise 326 patients, and Group II (diabetic patients), comprise 94 patients. Mean follow-up duration was 39.3 ± 28.1 months. Short-term, 30-day and in-hospital mortality, also intermediate-term mortality (1- and 3-year) was higher in the DM group compared with the non-DM group, but did not reach statistical significance: 11.7% vs. 7.7%. (p = 0.215); 12.8% vs. 8.3% (p = 0.285); 20.2% vs. 13.2% (p = 0.1) and 23.4% vs. 15.6% (p = 0.09) respectively. Long-term, 5-year mortality was significantly higher in the DM group, compared to the non-DM group: 30.9% vs. 16.6% (p = 0.003). Furthermore, predictors for long-term mortality included diabetes (CI 1.056–2.785, p = 0.029), as demonstrated by regression analysis.ConclusionsDiabetic patients have trend to increasing mortality at the short- and intermediate period post-surgery for IE, but this is not statistically significant. Survival of diabetic patients deteriorates after more than three years follow surgery. Diabetes is an independent predictor for long-term, 5-year mortality after surgical treatment of endocarditis, regardless of the patients age and comorbidities.