Susan Carol Losh
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Susan Carol Losh has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Brandon Nzekwe
Florida State University
1 shared publication- Brandon Nzekwe
Department of Educational Psychology and Learning Systems, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA
1 shared publication Margareta Pop
Florida State University , USA
1 shared publicationRyan Wilke
Florida State University , USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 October 2016
- Published by SAGE Publications in Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
- Vol. 36 (3) , 147-149
Why It Matters: U.S. Adult Perceptions of Environmental Scientist Agreement on Global Warming
- 1 October 2016
- Published by SAGE Publications in Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
- Vol. 36 (3) , 147-149
Why It Matters: U.S. Adult Perceptions of Environmental Scientist Agreement on Global Warming
- 1 February 2014
- Published by SAGE Publications in Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
- Vol. 34 (1-2) , 3-6
Are Public Education . . . Science Museums . . . Under Siege?
- 1 February 2014
- Published by SAGE Publications in Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
- Vol. 34 (1-2) , 3-6
Are Public Education . . . Science Museums . . . Under Siege?
- 1 October 2013
- Published by SAGE Publications in Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
- Vol. 33 (5-6) , 135-137
Dickens Reconsidered or Data Under Siege?
- 1 October 2013
- Published by SAGE Publications in Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
- Vol. 33 (5-6) , 135-137
Dickens Reconsidered or Data Under Siege?
- 1 February 2013
- Published by SAGE Publications in Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
- Vol. 33 (1-2) , 3-5
Introduction
- 1 February 2013
- Published by SAGE Publications in Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
- Vol. 33 (1-2) , 3-5
Introduction
- 19 April 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Science Education and Technology
- Vol. 20 (5) , 579-591
The Influence of Education Major: How Diverse Preservice Teachers View Pseudoscience Topics
- 19 April 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Science Education and Technology
- Vol. 20 (5) , 579-591
The Influence of Education Major: How Diverse Preservice Teachers View Pseudoscience Topics
- 11 June 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Science & Education
- Vol. 20 (5-6) , 473-489
Creatures in the Classroom: Preservice Teacher Beliefs About Fantastic Beasts, Magic, Extraterrestrials, Evolution and Creationism
- 11 June 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Science & Education
- Vol. 20 (5-6) , 473-489
Creatures in the Classroom: Preservice Teacher Beliefs About Fantastic Beasts, Magic, Extraterrestrials, Evolution and Creationism
- 7 April 2009
- Published by SAGE Publications in Public Understanding of Science
- Vol. 19 (3) , 372-382
Stereotypes about scientists over time among US adults: 1983 and 2001
Prior research demonstrates that students and some teachers often depict scientists as socially inept workaholic males; however, scholars rarely examine representative samples of adults. How the US general public stereotypes scientists may influence accepting science expertise because its practitioners can appear so eccentric. By expressing negative stereotypes, “typical adults” also can discourage youthful interests in science. This study analyzes general public interview data using identical questions from the 1983 and 2001 National Science Foundation Surveys of Public Understanding of Science and Technology, probability samples of 3219 adults. Despite many positive changes over nearly 20 years, and strong approval of a child’s potential science career, sizable minorities of adults continued to negatively stereotype scientists. Women were more positive than men but had considered a science career less often. Images of scientists also were affected by age, educational variables, parental status, and a religiosity measure.
- 7 April 2009
- Published by SAGE Publications in Public Understanding of Science
- Vol. 19 (3) , 372-382
Stereotypes about scientists over time among US adults: 1983 and 2001
Prior research demonstrates that students and some teachers often depict scientists as socially inept workaholic males; however, scholars rarely examine representative samples of adults. How the US general public stereotypes scientists may influence accepting science expertise because its practitioners can appear so eccentric. By expressing negative stereotypes, “typical adults” also can discourage youthful interests in science. This study analyzes general public interview data using identical questions from the 1983 and 2001 National Science Foundation Surveys of Public Understanding of Science and Technology, probability samples of 3219 adults. Despite many positive changes over nearly 20 years, and strong approval of a child’s potential science career, sizable minorities of adults continued to negatively stereotype scientists. Women were more positive than men but had considered a science career less often. Images of scientists also were affected by age, educational variables, parental status, and a religiosity measure.
- 11 April 2008
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Science Education
- Vol. 30 (6) , 773-792
Some Methodological Issues with “Draw a Scientist Tests” among Young Children
Children’s stereotypes about scientists have been postulated to affect student science identity and interest in science. Findings from prior studies using “Draw a Scientist Test” methods suggest that students see scientists as largely white, often unattractive, men; one consequence may be that girls and minority students feel a science career is “not like me”. However, a major shortcoming in prior research is that scholars have asked children to draw only scientists, thus making interpretations of earlier research findings ambiguous. We added other professionals to compare how 616 drawings of teachers, scientists, and veterinarians by 206 elementary school children varied by student gender, ethnicity, and grade. Students made clear distinctions: drawing teachers as most attractive and largely female, and scientists as most often male and least attractive. Aspects of the drawings suggest that scientists do have an “image problem” among children. However, large sex differences in the drawings and often‐unrecognizable gender figures in boys’ pictures lead us to question use of the “Draw a Scientist Test” as a projective test among young children.
- 11 April 2008
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Science Education
- Vol. 30 (6) , 773-792
Some Methodological Issues with “Draw a Scientist Tests” among Young Children
Children’s stereotypes about scientists have been postulated to affect student science identity and interest in science. Findings from prior studies using “Draw a Scientist Test” methods suggest that students see scientists as largely white, often unattractive, men; one consequence may be that girls and minority students feel a science career is “not like me”. However, a major shortcoming in prior research is that scholars have asked children to draw only scientists, thus making interpretations of earlier research findings ambiguous. We added other professionals to compare how 616 drawings of teachers, scientists, and veterinarians by 206 elementary school children varied by student gender, ethnicity, and grade. Students made clear distinctions: drawing teachers as most attractive and largely female, and scientists as most often male and least attractive. Aspects of the drawings suggest that scientists do have an “image problem” among children. However, large sex differences in the drawings and often‐unrecognizable gender figures in boys’ pictures lead us to question use of the “Draw a Scientist Test” as a projective test among young children.