William Robert Eric Jamieson
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
William Robert Eric Jamieson has a total of 42 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Eva Germann
3 shared publicationsGuy J. Fradet
3 shared publicationsJian Ye
3 shared publicationsAnson Cheung
2 shared publicationsFlorence Chan
2 shared publicationsJennifer Higgins
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 1 January 2020
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 159 (1) , 86-87
Commentary: Control of thromboembolism and bleeding complications with mechanical heart valve prostheses (time in therapeutic range)
- 1 January 2020
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 159 (1) , 86-87
Commentary: Control of thromboembolism and bleeding complications with mechanical heart valve prostheses (time in therapeutic range)
- 1 June 2015
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 149 (6) , 1576-1577
St Jude Medical Trifecta aortic prosthesis: Considerations for implantation
- 1 June 2015
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 149 (6) , 1576-1577
St Jude Medical Trifecta aortic prosthesis: Considerations for implantation
- 1 November 2013
- Published by Elsevier in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 96 (5) , 1620
Invited commentary.
- 1 November 2013
- Published by Elsevier in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 96 (5) , 1620
Invited commentary.
- 1 March 2012
- Vol. 21 (2) , 148-55
Conventional aortic valve replacement remains a safe option in patients aged > or = 70 years: a 20-year experience.
Increased life expectancy has resulted in the elderly frequently presenting with severe aortic stenosis. It has therefore become important to define indications for conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in this patient population. Thus, patients aged > or = 70 years undergoing conventional isolated AVR were evaluated for predictors of early and late mortality. A retrospective analysis was conducted of prospectively collected data available from 1,061 consecutive patients (age range: 70-94 years) who underwent isolated AVR between 1982 and 2002. The patient age groups were 70-74 years (n = 466), 75-79 years (n = 367), and > or = 80 years (n = 228). The mean follow up was 6.0 +/- 4.4 years, and the total follow up 6,390 patient-years. Twenty-two variables were considered as potential risk factors for early and late mortality. Early mortality was higher in patients aged > or = 80 years than in those aged 70-79 years. Early mortality in patients aged > or = 80 years was lower between 1998 and 2002 than between 1982 and 1997. Multivariate predictors of early mortality were age > or = 80 years, operative status, previous intervention, renal failure, and mitral regurgitation. The early nonfatal complication rate was similar for patients aged 70-79 years and > or = 80 years, but late mortality was lower between 1998 and 2002 than between 1982 and 1997 in patients aged 70-79 years, and in those aged > or = 80 years. The 10-year actuarial survivals after AVR in patients aged 70-74, 75-79, and > or = 80 years were 54 +/- 3.0%, 43 +/- 3.8% and 17 +/- 3.9%, respectively. Multivariate predictors of late mortality were age 75-79 years, age > or = 80 years, peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Female gender was shown to be protective. Early mortality was higher in patients aged > or = 80 years undergoing AVR, though this has declined recently and is currently at an acceptable level. Other important predictors of mortality in elderly patients undergoing AVR are operative status, previous interventions, renal failure, mitral regurgitation, male gender, PVD, and COPD. Thus, conventional AVR remains a safe treatment option for the elderly patient.
- 1 March 2012
- Vol. 21 (2) , 148-55
Conventional aortic valve replacement remains a safe option in patients aged > or = 70 years: a 20-year experience.
Increased life expectancy has resulted in the elderly frequently presenting with severe aortic stenosis. It has therefore become important to define indications for conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in this patient population. Thus, patients aged > or = 70 years undergoing conventional isolated AVR were evaluated for predictors of early and late mortality. A retrospective analysis was conducted of prospectively collected data available from 1,061 consecutive patients (age range: 70-94 years) who underwent isolated AVR between 1982 and 2002. The patient age groups were 70-74 years (n = 466), 75-79 years (n = 367), and > or = 80 years (n = 228). The mean follow up was 6.0 +/- 4.4 years, and the total follow up 6,390 patient-years. Twenty-two variables were considered as potential risk factors for early and late mortality. Early mortality was higher in patients aged > or = 80 years than in those aged 70-79 years. Early mortality in patients aged > or = 80 years was lower between 1998 and 2002 than between 1982 and 1997. Multivariate predictors of early mortality were age > or = 80 years, operative status, previous intervention, renal failure, and mitral regurgitation. The early nonfatal complication rate was similar for patients aged 70-79 years and > or = 80 years, but late mortality was lower between 1998 and 2002 than between 1982 and 1997 in patients aged 70-79 years, and in those aged > or = 80 years. The 10-year actuarial survivals after AVR in patients aged 70-74, 75-79, and > or = 80 years were 54 +/- 3.0%, 43 +/- 3.8% and 17 +/- 3.9%, respectively. Multivariate predictors of late mortality were age 75-79 years, age > or = 80 years, peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Female gender was shown to be protective. Early mortality was higher in patients aged > or = 80 years undergoing AVR, though this has declined recently and is currently at an acceptable level. Other important predictors of mortality in elderly patients undergoing AVR are operative status, previous interventions, renal failure, mitral regurgitation, male gender, PVD, and COPD. Thus, conventional AVR remains a safe treatment option for the elderly patient.
- 1 September 2011
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 142 (3) , 595-601.e2
Influence of patient gender on mortality after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis
- 1 September 2011
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 142 (3) , 595-601.e2
Influence of patient gender on mortality after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis
- 1 August 2011
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 142 (2) , 302-307.e2
Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: Assessment of 12-year performance
- 1 August 2011
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 142 (2) , 302-307.e2
Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: Assessment of 12-year performance
- 1 June 2011
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 141 (6) , 1449-1454.e2
St Jude Medical Epic porcine bioprosthesis: Results of the regulatory evaluation
- 1 June 2011
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 141 (6) , 1449-1454.e2
St Jude Medical Epic porcine bioprosthesis: Results of the regulatory evaluation
- Open Access
- 1 November 2010
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 38 (5) , 649-650
Reply to Quiroga et al.
This letter is a response to the letter to the editor by Quiroga et al. [1], to the article by Jamieson et al. [2] ‘Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis — clinical performance’ (EJCTS2009). Alvarez et al. [3] recently published the article ‘Early calcification of the aortic Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly’ (ICVTS2009). Alvarez [3] reported 20 re-operations for structural valve deterioration (SVD) and 27 patients with asymptomatic valve deterioration identified by routine echocardiography.
- 1 November 2010
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 38 (5) , 649-650
Open AccessReply to Quiroga et al.
This letter is a response to the letter to the editor by Quiroga et al. [1], to the article by Jamieson et al. [2] ‘Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis — clinical performance’ (EJCTS2009). Alvarez et al. [3] recently published the article ‘Early calcification of the aortic Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly’ (ICVTS2009). Alvarez [3] reported 20 re-operations for structural valve deterioration (SVD) and 27 patients with asymptomatic valve deterioration identified by routine echocardiography.
- 1 September 2010
- Vol. 19 (5) , 559-60
Assessment of structural valve deterioration extended to 20 years--review of documentation on the St. Jude Medical bioprostheses.
- 1 September 2010
- Vol. 19 (5) , 559-60
Assessment of structural valve deterioration extended to 20 years--review of documentation on the St. Jude Medical bioprostheses.
- 23 March 2010
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon
- Vol. 58 (02) , 69-75
Hemodynamic Performance of Mitroflow Aortic Pericardial Bioprosthesis – Optimizing Management for the Small Aortic Annulus
Background: Documentation of the hemodynamics of the Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis has been incomplete. The aim of the study was to provide reference effective orifice areas for the implant calculation of effective orifice area indexes to avoid prosthesis-patient mismatch. Methods: Echocardiograms were evaluated in 55 patients (39 females, 16 males), mean age 77.0 ± 6.9 years (range 51–90 years). The mean time of the studies was 11.0 months. The prosthesis sizes and numbers evaluated were 19 mm (n = 13), 21 mm (n = 19), 23 mm (n = 13) and 25 mm (n = 10). Results: Peak aortic velocities averaged from 2.2 to 2.7 m/sec, mean gradients from 10.6 to 15.1 mmHg, peak gradients from 20.7 to 29.7 mmHg, and effective orifice area (EOA) from 1.4 to 1.8 cm2. When accounting for the subaortic velocity, mean gradients averaged from 7.5 to 10.0 mmHg, and peak gradients averaged 15.1 to 23.5 mmHg. The effective orifice area indexes ranged from 0.8 to 1.0 cm2/m2. The mean postoperative left ventricular mass index was 101.6 gm/m2. Conclusions: The in vivo effective orifice areas by valve size of the Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis provide the opportunity of avoiding obstructive characteristics for all valve sizes, including optimizing the management of the small aortic annulus.
- 23 March 2010
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon
- Vol. 58 (02) , 69-75
Hemodynamic Performance of Mitroflow Aortic Pericardial Bioprosthesis – Optimizing Management for the Small Aortic Annulus
Background: Documentation of the hemodynamics of the Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis has been incomplete. The aim of the study was to provide reference effective orifice areas for the implant calculation of effective orifice area indexes to avoid prosthesis-patient mismatch. Methods: Echocardiograms were evaluated in 55 patients (39 females, 16 males), mean age 77.0 ± 6.9 years (range 51–90 years). The mean time of the studies was 11.0 months. The prosthesis sizes and numbers evaluated were 19 mm (n = 13), 21 mm (n = 19), 23 mm (n = 13) and 25 mm (n = 10). Results: Peak aortic velocities averaged from 2.2 to 2.7 m/sec, mean gradients from 10.6 to 15.1 mmHg, peak gradients from 20.7 to 29.7 mmHg, and effective orifice area (EOA) from 1.4 to 1.8 cm2. When accounting for the subaortic velocity, mean gradients averaged from 7.5 to 10.0 mmHg, and peak gradients averaged 15.1 to 23.5 mmHg. The effective orifice area indexes ranged from 0.8 to 1.0 cm2/m2. The mean postoperative left ventricular mass index was 101.6 gm/m2. Conclusions: The in vivo effective orifice areas by valve size of the Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis provide the opportunity of avoiding obstructive characteristics for all valve sizes, including optimizing the management of the small aortic annulus.