Kartik S. Jhaveri

Background: Identifying high-grade strictures (HGS) in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) relies upon subjective assessments of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Quantitative MRCP (MRCP+) provides objective evaluation of MRCP examinations, which may help make these assessments more consistent and improve patient management and selection for intervention. We evaluated the impact of MRCP+ on clinicians’ confidence in diagnosing HGS in patients with PSC. Methods: Three expert abdominal radiologists independently assessed 28 patients with PSC. Radiological reads of MRCPs were performed twice, in a random order, three weeks apart, then a third time with MRCP+. HGS presence was recorded on semi-quantitative confidence scales. The cases where readers definitively agreed on presence/absence of HGS were used to assess inter- and intra-reader agreement and confidence. Results: When using MRCP alone, high intra-reader agreement was observed in identifying HGS within both intra- and extrahepatic ducts (64.3% and 70.8%, respectively), while inter-reader agreement was significantly lower for intrahepatic ducts (42.9%) than extrahepatic ducts (66.1%) (p < 0.01). Using MRCP+ in the third read significantly improved inter-reader agreement for intrahepatic HGS detection to 67.9% versus baseline reads (p = 0.02) and was comparable with extrahepatic ducts. Reader confidence tended to increase when supplemented with MRCP+, and inter-reader variability decreased. MRCP+ metrics had good performance in identifying HGS in both extra-hepatic (AUC:0.85) and intra-hepatic ducts (AUC:0.75). Conclusions: MRCP evaluation supported by quantitative metrics tended to increase individual reader confidence and reduce inter-reader variability for detecting HGS. Our results indicate that MRCP+ might help standardize MRCP assessment and subsequent management for patients with PSC.

Purpose: To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative MRCP-derived metrics generated from MRCP + software, designed for assessing biliary tree health. Methods: Metric accuracy was assessed using a 3D-printed phantom containing 20 tubes with sinusoidally-varying diameters, simulating strictures and dilatations along ducts. Data from 80 participants (60 healthy volunteers and 20 with liver disease) was analysed in total. Repeatability and reproducibility of the quantitative metrics were assessed on Siemens, GE and Philips scanners at both 1.5T and 3T. All subjects were scanned on a Siemens Prisma 3T scanner which acted as the reference scanner. A subset of these participants also underwent scanning on the remaining scanners. Data from healthy volunteers was used to estimate the natural range of measured values (reference ranges). The reproducibility coefficient (RC) of 7 commonly reported quantitative metrics were compared between healthy controls and published values in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients. Results: The phantom analysis confirmed measurement accuracy with absolute bias of 0.0-0.1 for strictures and 0.1–0.2 for dilatations across all scanners (95% limits of agreement within ± 1.0). In vivo, RCs for the quantitative MRCP-derived metrics across the scanners ranged from: 12.4–25.4 for total number of ducts; 4.9–7.9 for number of dilatations; 3.3–6.5 for number of strictures; 4.6–9.8 mm for total length of dilatations; 26.5–51.7 mm for total length of strictures; and 4.4–6.8 for number of ducts with a stricture or dilatation. Repeatability on the same scanner was generally better than comparisons across scanners. Six metrics demonstrated sufficient cross-scanner reproducibility to distinguish healthy volunteers from PSC patients. Conclusion: The precision of quantitative MRCP-derived metrics were sufficient to differentiate PSC and healthy subjects and should be well suited for multi-centre trials and assessment of biliary tree health.

Large language models enabled accurate automated clinical histories for oncologic imaging that were markedly more complete than original requisition histories and preferred by radiologists for image interpretation and safety.

Background: Current preoperative imaging is insufficient to predict survival and tumor recurrence in endometrial cancer (EC), necessitating invasive procedures for risk stratification.Purpose: To establish a multiparametric MRI radiomics model for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and high-risk histopathologic features in EC.Methods: This retrospective study included 71 patients with histopathology-proven EC and preoperative MRI over a 10-year period. Clinicopathology data were extracted from health records. Manual MRI segmentation was performed on T2-weighted (T2W), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps and dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (DCE T1WI). Radiomic feature (RF) extraction was performed with PyRadiomics. Associations between RF and histopathologic features were assessed using logistic regression. Associations between DFS and RF or clinicopathologic features were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model. All RF with univariate analysis p-value < 0.2 were included in elastic net analysis to build radiomic signatures.Results: The 3-year DFS rate was 68% (95% CI = 57%-80%). There were no significant clinicopathologic predictors for DFS, whilst the radiomics signature was a strong predictor of DFS (pa priori approach to predicting DFS and high-risk histopathologic features in EC.

MR elastography demonstrated excellent stiffness measurement precision and test-retest repeatability across five study centers, 10 scanners, three manufacturers, two field strengths, two MR elastography sequences, and three phantoms mimicking different degrees of liver stiffness.