Paul Burger
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Paul Burger has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Claus-Heinrich Daub
Institute of Management, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Windisch, Switzerland
2 shared publications - Yvonne M. Scherrer
University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland
2 shared publications Annika Sohre
Sustainability Research Group, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
1 shared publicationBasil Bornemann
Sustainability Research Group, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
1 shared publicationBenjamin Volland
Sustainability Research Group, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
1 shared publicationCorinne Moser
Sustainability Research Group, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 15 June 2015
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Energy Research
- Vol. 3
Advances in Understanding Energy Consumption Behavior and the Governance of Its Change – Outline of an Integrated Framework
Transforming today’s energy systems in industrialized countries requires a substantial reduction of the total energy consumption at the individual level. Selected instruments have been found to be effective in changing people’s behavior in single domains. However, the so far weak success story on reducing overall energy consumption indicates that our understanding of the determining factors of individual energy consumption as well as of its change is far from being conclusive. Among others, the scientific state of the art is dominated by analyzing single domains of consumption and by neglecting embodied energy. It also displays strong disciplinary splits and the literature often fails to distinguish between explaining behavior and explaining change of behavior. Moreover, there are knowledge gaps regarding the legitimacy and effectiveness of the governance of individual consumption behavior and its change. Against this backdrop, the aim of this paper is to establish an integrated interdisciplinary framework that offers a systematic basis for linking the different aspects in research on energy related consumption behavior, thus paving the way for establishing a better evidence base to inform societal actions. The framework connects the three relevant analytical aspects of the topic in question: (1) It systematically and conceptually frames the objects, i.e. the energy consumption behavior and its change (explananda); (2) it structures the factors that potentially explain the energy consumption behavior and its change (explanantia); (3) it provides a differentiated understanding of change inducing interventions in terms of governance. Based on the existing states of the art approaches from different disciplines within the social sciences the proposed framework is supposed to guide interdisciplinary empirical research.
- 15 June 2015
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Energy Research
- Vol. 3
Open AccessAdvances in Understanding Energy Consumption Behavior and the Governance of Its Change – Outline of an Integrated Framework
Transforming today’s energy systems in industrialized countries requires a substantial reduction of the total energy consumption at the individual level. Selected instruments have been found to be effective in changing people’s behavior in single domains. However, the so far weak success story on reducing overall energy consumption indicates that our understanding of the determining factors of individual energy consumption as well as of its change is far from being conclusive. Among others, the scientific state of the art is dominated by analyzing single domains of consumption and by neglecting embodied energy. It also displays strong disciplinary splits and the literature often fails to distinguish between explaining behavior and explaining change of behavior. Moreover, there are knowledge gaps regarding the legitimacy and effectiveness of the governance of individual consumption behavior and its change. Against this backdrop, the aim of this paper is to establish an integrated interdisciplinary framework that offers a systematic basis for linking the different aspects in research on energy related consumption behavior, thus paving the way for establishing a better evidence base to inform societal actions. The framework connects the three relevant analytical aspects of the topic in question: (1) It systematically and conceptually frames the objects, i.e. the energy consumption behavior and its change (explananda); (2) it structures the factors that potentially explain the energy consumption behavior and its change (explanantia); (3) it provides a differentiated understanding of change inducing interventions in terms of governance. Based on the existing states of the art approaches from different disciplines within the social sciences the proposed framework is supposed to guide interdisciplinary empirical research.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2015
- Published by Resilience Alliance, Inc. in Ecology and Society
- Vol. 20 (2)
Merging capabilities and livelihoods: analyzing the use of biological resources to improve well-being
Lienert, J., and P. Burger. 2015. Merging capabilities and livelihoods: analyzing the use of biological resources to improve well-being. Ecology and Society 20(2): 20.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07405-200220
- 1 January 2015
- Published by Resilience Alliance, Inc. in Ecology and Society
- Vol. 20 (2)
Open AccessMerging capabilities and livelihoods: analyzing the use of biological resources to improve well-being
Lienert, J., and P. Burger. 2015. Merging capabilities and livelihoods: analyzing the use of biological resources to improve well-being. Ecology and Society 20(2): 20.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07405-200220
- Open Access
- 21 November 2014
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 6 (11) , 8342-8347
Strategies for Sustainability: Institutional and Organisational Challenges
Sustainable Development (SD) is a global role model that claims to function as a general orientation for shaping societal processes, i.e., local, regional, national and international development. This is in line with the Brundtland and justice-oriented understanding of the term. It is understood as a role model and sometimes also interpreted as a regulative ideal. However, it does not state how exactly “sustainable” societies will or should look. It does not give us a step-by-step pattern to follow, but something like a frame of what ought to be done in order to transform today’s societies, including their economies.
- 21 November 2014
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 6 (11) , 8342-8347
Open AccessStrategies for Sustainability: Institutional and Organisational Challenges
Sustainable Development (SD) is a global role model that claims to function as a general orientation for shaping societal processes, i.e., local, regional, national and international development. This is in line with the Brundtland and justice-oriented understanding of the term. It is understood as a role model and sometimes also interpreted as a regulative ideal. However, it does not state how exactly “sustainable” societies will or should look. It does not give us a step-by-step pattern to follow, but something like a frame of what ought to be done in order to transform today’s societies, including their economies.
- 1 April 2009
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Business Ethics
- Vol. 85 (S3) , 479-481
New Perspectives on Sustainable Business (Editorial)
- 1 April 2009
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Business Ethics
- Vol. 85 (S3) , 479-481
New Perspectives on Sustainable Business (Editorial)