Luc Baron

The TiC particles in titanium metal matrix composites (TiMMCs) make them difficult to machine. As a specific MMC, it is legitimate to wonder if the cutting mechanisms of TiMMCs are the same as or similar to those of MMCs. For this purpose, the tool wear mechanisms for turning, milling, and grinding are reviewed in this paper and compared with those for other MMCs. In addition, the chip formation and morphology, the material removal mechanism and surface quality are discussed for the different machining processes and examined thoroughly. Comparisons of the machining mechanisms between the TiMMCs and MMCs indicate that the findings for other MMCs should not be taken for granted for TiMMCs for the machining processes reviewed. The increase in cutting speed leads to a decrease in roughness value during grinding and an increase of the tool life during turning. Unconventional machining such as laser-assisted turning is effective to increase tool life. Under certain conditions, a “wear shield” was observed during the early stages of tool wear during turning, thereby increasing tool life considerably. The studies carried out on milling showed that the cutting parameters affecting surface roughness and tool wear are dependent on the tool material. The high temperatures and high shears that occur during machining lead to microstructural changes in the workpiece during grinding, and in the chips during turning. The adiabatic shear band (ASB) of the chips is the seat of the sub-grains’ formation. Finally, the cutting speed and lubrication influenced dust emission during turning but more studies are needed to validate this finding. For the milling or grinding, there are major areas to be considered for thoroughly understanding the machining behavior of TiMMCs (tool wear mechanisms, chip formation, dust emission, etc.).

Designing mechatronic systems is known to be both a very complex and tedious process. This complexity is due to the high number of system components, their multi-physical aspects, the couplings between different engineering domains and the interacting and/or conflicting design objectives. Due to this inherent complexity and the dynamic coupling between subsystems of mechatronic systems, a systematic and multi-objective design approach is needed to replace the traditionally used sequential design methods. The traditional approaches usually lead to functional but non optimal designs solutions. In this paper, and based on an integrated and concurrent design approach called “Design-for-Control” (DFC), a quadrotor UAV equipped with a stereo visual servoing system is used as a case study. After presenting the dynamics and the control model of the Quadrotor UAV and its visual servoing system, the design process has been performed in four iterations and as expected, the control performance of the system has been significantly improved after finishing the final design iteration.