LBLindell Bromham

Lindell Bromham

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Lindell Bromham has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Andrew Rambaut

    Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK GB

    2 shared publications
  • David Penny

    Institute for Molecular BioSciences, Massey University, P.O. Box 11-222, Palmerston North, Aotearoa (New Zealand) NZ

    2 shared publications
  • Alan Cooper

    Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005 Australia

    1 shared publication
  • Bernard M. Degnan

    Centre for Marine Science and School of the Environment, The University of Queensland

    1 shared publication
  • David Penny

    Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

    1 shared publication
  • Francis Clark

    Department of Zoology,1 Department of Mathematics,2 and Division of Veterinary Pathology and Anatomy,3 University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Discovery of a Novel Murine Type C Retrovirus by Data Mining

    by Lindell Bromham, Francis Clark, Jeff J. McKee

    Analysis of genomic and expression data allows both identification and characterization of novel retroviruses. We describe a recombinant type C murine retrovirus, similar to the Mus dunni endogenous retrovirus, with VL30-like long terminal repeats and murine leukemia virus-like coding sequences. This virus is present in multiple copies in the mouse genome and expressed in a range of mouse tissues.


  • Can fast early rates reconcile molecular dates with the Cambrian explosion?

    by L. D. Bromham, M. D. Hendy

    Molecular dates consistently place the divergence of major metazoan lineages in the Precambrian, leading to the suggestion that the 'Cambrian explosion' is an artefact of preservation which left earlier forms unrecorded in the fossil record.While criticisms of molecular analyses for failing to deal with variation in the rate of molecular evolution adequately have been countered by analyses which allow both siteto–site and lineage–specific rate variation, no analysis to date has allowed the rates to vary temporally. If the rates of molecular evolution were much higher early in the metazoan radiation, molecular dates could consistently overestimate the divergence times of lineages. Here, we use a new method which uses multiple calibration dates and an empirically determined range of possible substitution rates to place bounds on the basal date of divergence of lineages in order to ask whether faster rates of molecular evolution early in the metazoan radiation could possibly account for the discrepancy between molecular and palaeontological date estimates. We find that allowing basal (interphylum) lineages the fastest observed substitution rate brings the minimum possible divergence date (586 million years ago) to the Vendian period, just before the first multicellular animal fossils, but excludes divergence of the major metazoan lineages in a Cambrian explosion.


  • The Power of Relative Rates Tests Depends on the Data

    by Lindell Bromham, David Penny, Andrew Rambaut, Michael D. Hendy

    One of the most useful features of molecular phylogenetic analyses is the potential for estimating dates of divergence of evolutionary lineages from the DNA of extant species. But lineage-specific variation in rate of molecular evolution complicates molecular dating, because a calibration rate estimated from one lineage may not be an accurate representation of the rate in other lineages. Many molecular dating studies use a ``clock test'' to identify and exclude sequences that vary in rate between lineages. However, these clock tests should not be relied upon without a critical examination of their effectiveness at removing rate variable sequences from any given data set, particularly with regard to the sequence length and number of variable sites. As an illustration of this problem we present a power test of a frequently employed triplet relative rates test. We conclude that (1) relative rates tests are unlikely to detect moderate levels of lineage-specific rate variation (where one lineage has a rate of molecular evolution 1.5 to 4.0 times the other) for most commonly used sequences in molecular dating analyses, and (2) this lack of power is likely to result in substantial error in the estimation of dates of divergence. As an example, we show that the well-studied rate difference between murid rodents and great apes will not be detected for many of the sequences used to date the divergence between these two lineages and that this failure to detect rate variation is likely to result in consistent overestimation the date of the rodent–primate split.


  • Hemichordates and deuterostome evolution: robust molecular phylogenetic support for a hemichordate + echinoderm clade

    by Lindell D. Bromham, Bernard M. Degnan

    SUMMARY Hemichordates were traditionally allied to the chordates, but recent molecular analyses have suggested that hemichordates are a sister group to the echinoderms, a relationship that has important consequences for the interpretation of the evolution of deuterostome body plans. However, the molecular phylogenetic analyses to date have not provided robust support for the hemichordate + echinoderm clade. We use a maximum likelihood framework, including the parametric bootstrap, to reanalyze DNA data from complete mitochondrial genomes and nuclear 18S rRNA. This approach provides the first statistically significant support for the hemichordate + echinoderm clade from molecular data. This grouping implies that the ancestral deuterostome had features that included an adult with a pharynx and a dorsal nerve cord and an indirectly developing dipleurula‐like larva.


  • Reply from L. Bromham, D. Penny and M.J. Phillips

    by Lindell Bromham, David Penny, Matthew Phillips


  • Testing the Cambrian explosion hypothesis by using a molecular dating technique

    by Lindell Bromham, Andrew Rambaut, Richard Fortey, Alan Cooper, David Penny

    Molecular studies have the potential to shed light on the origin of the animal phyla by providing independent estimates of the divergence times, but have been criticized for failing to account adequately for variation in rate of evolution. A method of dating divergence times from molecular data addresses the criticisms of earlier studies and provides more realistic, but wider, confidence intervals. The data are not compatible with the Cambrian explosion hypothesis as an explanation for the origin of metazoan phyla, and provide additional support for an extended period of Precambrian metazoan diversification.