Denise M. Oleske

Randomized clinical trial. To evaluate the effectiveness of a back support plus education versus education alone in promoting recovery from a work-related low back disorder (WR-LBD) while simultaneously considering personal, health, and occupational factors and the impact of occupational factors on recovery. No randomized studies of active industrial workers with low back disorders exist regarding the effectiveness of back supports plus education. A total of 433 actively employed hourly union workers who had a recent diagnosis of a WR-LBD: 1) those who wore a specially designed back support plus received education on back health; and 2) those who received education on back health only. Demographic, health, medical, and occupational factors were obtained through interview or abstraction of computer files; individual ergonomic exposures were measured with a lumbar motion monitor. Outcomes evaluated over a 12-month period included: self-reported measures of back pain, back pain disability level, physical health, mental health, and administrative measures of recurrence, lost work time, and medical care utilization. There was no difference between the study groups with respect to mental or physical health, low back pain, back pain disability, neurogenic symptoms, lost work time, likelihood of recurrence of an episode of a back disorder, or other administrative measures of healthcare utilization or lost work time. However, significant decreases in low back pain, low back pain disability, neurogenic symptoms, and an increase in physical health were observed over the 12 months of observation in both study groups. The only occupational variable found to influence was plant group whereby service parts operations workers in the back support plus education group experienced a lower likelihood of WR-LBD recurrence. Although there was no overall effect on self-reported recovery or administrative measures or lost work time between the study groups, a back support plus health education may have some value in preventing recurrent WR-LBD in industrial workers who work in psychosocial environments and perform manual material handling tasks similar to those found in parts distribution centers.

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of women with breast cancer as teachers of the importance of breast cancer screening to their first-degree female relatives. The sample was restricted to low-income working age women recruited from four hospitals. The study design was a randomized clinical trial. At each hospital, breast cancer patients (probands) were randomized into one of two study groups: (i) intensive, individual educational training on breast cancer screening or (ii) standard clinic education on breast cancer screening. The probands were instructed to teach at least one of their first-degree female relatives (21+ years of age) about breast cancer screening techniques. Three to six months after the enrollment of the probands, their relatives were contacted by telephone to determine breast cancer screening practices. A total of 79 probands and 96 relatives participated in the study. Relatives in the education group when compared with the control group were: 1.25 times more likely to have clinical breast examination (p = 0.005), 2.83 times more likely to have scheduled a clinical breast examination (p = 0.046), and, 1.36 times more likely to have been told about performing breast self-examination (p = 0.05). Additionally, relatives in the education group were more likely to have received a pamphlet on breast cancer screening (RR = 1.58, p = 0.009) and have discussed the importance of breast cancer screening (RR = 1.33, p = 0.020) from the proband. Special education training did not impact mammography utilization of the relatives. From these findings, a tri-ethnic group of low-income women with breast cancer can be effective teachers of breast cancer screening practices, at least for promoting clinical breast examination and transmitting messaging for performance of breast self-examination if given the adequate training.

An observational longitudinal design. To characterize the rate of and risk factors for recurrent episodes of work-related low back disorder in industrial workers. Little data exist on risk factors for recurrent episodes of work-related low back disorders in employed persons. A total of 352 active hourly union employees who were diagnosed with a recent work-related low back disorder and who had at least one follow-up visit within 12 months enrolled for participation in a rehabilitation intervention study at the workplace. Information on clinical and job factors was obtained at each study visit. Job risk for low back disorder was quantified using the Lumbar Motion Monitor. The main outcome measure, recurrence of work-related low back pain, was derived from a computerized file of administrative records of visits to the plant's medical department. The rate of repeated episodes was 24.4%; an additional episode occurred in 2.3%. Adjusting for age, gender, health status and job exposures, lower levels of physical health, increasing back pain disability, spinal deformity, high stress, and increasing number of different jobs worked at the same plant were risk factors for a recurrent episodes of low back pain. Early identification of risk factors for a work-related low back disorder may signal the need for early and intense rehabilitation to prevent recurrent episodes. Because these findings were based on jobs with medium risk of low back disorders, other factors may be significant in higher risk jobs.

To identify factors associated with hospitalization after diagnosis of breast cancer in working-age women. Descriptive, retrospective survey. Caseload of a single medical oncologist affiliated with an urban, not-for-profit, academic medical center. 123 consecutively evaluated women aged 21-65 years with breast cancer associated with projected survival greater than three years. Data were collected from an electronic clinical file with demographic, diagnostic, and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) information. Four survey forms were mailed to subjects: (a) a form ascertaining personal demographics, health status, and healthcare utilization, (b) menopausal Symptom Rating Scale, (c) a hot flash diary, and (d) the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Menopausal symptoms, depression symptoms, age, time since diagnosis, and overnight hospitalization. An increasing depression score and increasing menopausal symptoms score were found to be independent predictors of hospitalization controlling for age at diagnosis, disease stage, and time since diagnosis. Demographic variables, HRT use at or prior to diagnosis (a proxy measure of health status), current self-reported health status, and hot flashes were not associated with hospitalization. Psychological factors can be important significant predictors of hospitalization in survivors of breast cancer independent of disease stage. Further study should be undertaken to determine whether support services directed at identifying and treating those at risk for depression or menopausal symptoms may reduce the likelihood of potentially avoidable hospitalization. The identification of those at high risk for hospitalization because of high levels of depressive or menopausal symptoms and prompt intervention offer the opportunity to improve the quality of life of breast cancer survivors and reduce the cost of health care for themselves, their families, and the healthcare system.

Objective: This study examined the impact of managed care on hospital obstetric outcomes in Medicaid-sponsored women. Methods: The study sample consisted of a total of 525,517 maternal deliveries for singleton births from three payer groups, Medicaid managed care, Medicaid fee-for-service, and private managed care in 439 short-term-stay nonfederal hospitals in California and Florida. Quality of care comparisons were made using six indicators. Data were derived from linked computer files of birth certificates, hospital discharge abstracts, Medicaid eligibility records, Medicaid health care claims, and surveys of hospital characteristics. Results: The overall multivariate likelihood of an adverse maternal outcome during hospitalization for a delivery was not significantly different between Medicaid managed care and Medicaid fee-for-service groups in California and Florida. However, mothers in the Medicaid managed care group compared with mothers in the private managed care group experienced a higher likelihood of eclampsia (California) (adjusted odds ratio = 1.26; 95% confidence interval 1.05, 1.57; P = .04). Conclusion: Overall, managed care has not adversely affected pregnancy outcomes in Medicaid-sponsored women. Yet, payer system changes may be insufficient to achieve complete parity of outcomes relative to private managed care patients.