Steven L. Clark
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Steven L. Clark has a total of 56 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Gary A. Dildy
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Baylor College of Medicine; Houston TX USA
11 shared publications - Michael A. Belfort
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine; Baylor College of Medicine; Houston TX USA
8 shared publications Amir A. Shamshirsaz
5 shared publications- Amirhossein Moaddab
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
5 shared publications Bahram Salmanian
5 shared publications- Karin Anneliese Fox
University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston Houston Texas USA
5 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 5 October 2018
- Published by Wiley
- p. 653-669
Amniotic Fluid Embolism
- 1 March 2017
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetric Anesthesia Digest
- Vol. 37 (1) , 3-4
An Update on the Use of Massive Transfusion Protocols in Obstetrics
- 1 March 2017
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetric Anesthesia Digest
- Vol. 37 (1) , 3-4
An Update on the Use of Massive Transfusion Protocols in Obstetrics
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 216 (1) , S532
939: Reducing the episiotomy rate - impact of the Hawthorne effect
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 216 (1) , S532
939: Reducing the episiotomy rate - impact of the Hawthorne effect
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 216 (1) , S494-S495
865: Multidisciplinary team learning in management of morbidly adherent placenta - outcome improvements over time
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 216 (1) , S494-S495
865: Multidisciplinary team learning in management of morbidly adherent placenta - outcome improvements over time
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 216 (1) , S155
249: Congenital anomalies among twins conceived by infertility treatment
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 216 (1) , S155
249: Congenital anomalies among twins conceived by infertility treatment
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 216 (1) , S152-S153
245: Posterior placentation in morbidly adherent placenta: a nested case-control study of characteristics and outcomes
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 216 (1) , S152-S153
245: Posterior placentation in morbidly adherent placenta: a nested case-control study of characteristics and outcomes
- 1 July 2016
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in American Journal of Perinatology
- Vol. 33 (12) , 1115-1120
Birth Rates Among Hispanics and Non-Hispanics and their Representation in Contemporary Obstetric Clinical Trials
Objective Our study aims were to establish whether subjects enrolled in current obstetric clinical trials proportionately reflects the contemporary representation of Hispanic ethnicities and their birth rates in the United States. Methods Using comprehensive source data over a defined interval (January 2011–September 2015) on birth rates by ethnicity from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), we evaluated the proportional rate by ethnicity, then analyzed the observed to expected relative ratio of enrolled subjects. Results Hispanic women comprise a significant contribution to births in the United States (23% of all births). Systematic analysis of 90 published obstetric clinical trials showed a correlation between inclusion of Hispanic gravidae and the corresponding state's birth rates (r = 0.501, p < 0.001). While the mean was strongly correlated, individual clinical trials may have relatively over-enrolled (n = 31, or 34%) or under-enrolled (n = 33, or 37%) relative to their regional population. In 48% of obstetric clinical trials the Hispanic proportion of the study population was not reported. Conclusion Hispanic gravidae represent a significant number of contemporary U.S. births, and are generally adequately represented as obstetric subjects in clinical trials. However, this is trial-dependent, with significant trial-specific under- and over-enrollment of Hispanic subjects relative to the regional birth population. This work was presented as abstract #551 at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine's 36th Annual Pregnancy Meeting; February 1 to 6, 2016, Atlanta, Georgia.
- 1 July 2016
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in American Journal of Perinatology
- Vol. 33 (12) , 1115-1120
Birth Rates Among Hispanics and Non-Hispanics and their Representation in Contemporary Obstetric Clinical Trials
Objective Our study aims were to establish whether subjects enrolled in current obstetric clinical trials proportionately reflects the contemporary representation of Hispanic ethnicities and their birth rates in the United States. Methods Using comprehensive source data over a defined interval (January 2011–September 2015) on birth rates by ethnicity from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), we evaluated the proportional rate by ethnicity, then analyzed the observed to expected relative ratio of enrolled subjects. Results Hispanic women comprise a significant contribution to births in the United States (23% of all births). Systematic analysis of 90 published obstetric clinical trials showed a correlation between inclusion of Hispanic gravidae and the corresponding state's birth rates (r = 0.501, p < 0.001). While the mean was strongly correlated, individual clinical trials may have relatively over-enrolled (n = 31, or 34%) or under-enrolled (n = 33, or 37%) relative to their regional population. In 48% of obstetric clinical trials the Hispanic proportion of the study population was not reported. Conclusion Hispanic gravidae represent a significant number of contemporary U.S. births, and are generally adequately represented as obstetric subjects in clinical trials. However, this is trial-dependent, with significant trial-specific under- and over-enrollment of Hispanic subjects relative to the regional birth population. This work was presented as abstract #551 at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine's 36th Annual Pregnancy Meeting; February 1 to 6, 2016, Atlanta, Georgia.
- 1 November 2014
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
- Vol. 69 (11) , 644-645
Maternal Mortality in the United States
- 1 November 2014
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
- Vol. 69 (11) , 644-645
Maternal Mortality in the United States