Charles D. Kolstad
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Charles D. Kolstad has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Alistair Ulph
University of Manchester
1 shared publication- Alistair Ulph
School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
1 shared publication - Corbett A. Grainger
University of California
1 shared publication - Olivier Deschenes
Department of Economics
1 shared publication Rolando M. Guzman
Grupo de Consultoría Pareto
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 24 November 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in Climatic Change
- Vol. 109 (S1) , 365-386
Economic impacts of climate change on California agriculture
- 24 November 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in Climatic Change
- Vol. 109 (S1) , 365-386
Economic impacts of climate change on California agriculture
- 7 May 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental and Resource Economics
- Vol. 50 (3) , 389-403
Uncertainty, Learning and Heterogeneity in International Environmental Agreements
- 7 May 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental and Resource Economics
- Vol. 50 (3) , 389-403
Uncertainty, Learning and Heterogeneity in International Environmental Agreements
- 20 October 2010
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy
- Vol. 10 (2)
Equity, Heterogeneity and International Environmental Agreements
Much of the literature on international environmental agreements (IEA) considers the case of identical countries. There is a much smaller literature concerning the more complex but more realistic case of country heterogeneity. This paper involves modifying the standard static homogeneous country model of international environmental agreements. In particular, we consider two types of countries, differing in size as well as in marginal damage from pollution. Although the IEA does not have a unique size in this case, we do introduce two equilibrium refinements and explore the implications for coalition size. The two refinements include one based on efficiency and one based on equity.
- 20 October 2010
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy
- Vol. 10 (2)
Equity, Heterogeneity and International Environmental Agreements
Much of the literature on international environmental agreements (IEA) considers the case of identical countries. There is a much smaller literature concerning the more complex but more realistic case of country heterogeneity. This paper involves modifying the standard static homogeneous country model of international environmental agreements. In particular, we consider two types of countries, differing in size as well as in marginal damage from pollution. Although the IEA does not have a unique size in this case, we do introduce two equilibrium refinements and explore the implications for coalition size. The two refinements include one based on efficiency and one based on equity.
- Open Access
- 30 March 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental and Resource Economics
- Vol. 46 (3) , 359-376
Who Pays a Price on Carbon?
- 30 March 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental and Resource Economics
- Vol. 46 (3) , 359-376
Open AccessWho Pays a Price on Carbon?
- 14 March 2008
- Published by Springer Nature in Climatic Change
- Vol. 89 (1-2) , 125-141
Learning and international environmental agreements
- 14 March 2008
- Published by Springer Nature in Climatic Change
- Vol. 89 (1-2) , 125-141
Learning and international environmental agreements
- 7 December 2006
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental and Resource Economics
- Vol. 37 (3) , 465-487
Researching Preferences, Valuation and Hypothetical Bias
- 7 December 2006
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental and Resource Economics
- Vol. 37 (3) , 465-487
Researching Preferences, Valuation and Hypothetical Bias