Gust H. Bardy

Background and Objectives: The prognostic impact of ventricular fibrillation (VF) recurrences after a successful shock in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) is still poorly understood, and some evidence suggests a potential pro-arrhythmic effect of chest compressions in this setting. In the present analysis, we looked at the short-term and long-term prognosis of VF recurrences in OOHCA. And their potential association with chest compressions. Materials and Methods: The Progetto Vita, prospectively collecting data on all resuscitation efforts in the Piacenza province (Italy), was used for the present analysis. From the 461 OOHCAs found in a shockable rhythm, only those with optimal ECG tracings and good audio recordings (160) were assessed. Rhythms other than VF post-shock were analyzed five seconds after shock delivery and survival to hospital admission, hospital discharge, and long-term survival data over a 14-year follow-up were collected. Results: Population mean age was 64.4 ± 16.9 years, and 31.9% of all patients were female. Mean time to EMS arrival was 5.9 ± 4.5 min. Short- and long-term survival without neurological impairment were higher in patients without VF recurrence when compared to patients with VF recurrence, independently from the pre-induction rhythm (p < 0.001). After shock delivery, VF recurrence was higher when chest compressions were resumed early after discharge and more vigorously. Conclusions: VF recurrences after a shock could worsen short and long-term survival. The potential pro-arrhythmic effect of chest compressions should be factored in when considering the real risks and benefits of this procedure.

Nichol et al. (December 3 issue)¹ assessed whether outcomes after continuous compressions with positive-pressure ventilation differed from those after compressions that were interrupted for ventilations at a ratio of 30 compressions to two ventilations (standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR]). In a recent trial involving realistic mannequins, the rate of adequate chest compressions was higher among those performing standard CPR than among those performing chest-compression-only CPR after 2 minutes, and the number of adequate chest compressions was higher among those performing standard CPR than among those performing compression-only CPR after 3 minutes, findings that were attributed to greater performer fatigue with compression-only CPR.² Moreover, a preliminary CPR study involving humans suggests that blood pressures achieved before interrupting CPR for any reason do not necessarily decrease after the interruption but may even increase if the duration of the interruption is less than 10 seconds and the quality of CPR is good both before and after the interruption.³

Subcutaneous Defibrillation in Canines. Introduction: This study reports the experimental process leading to development of an automatic totally subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (SICD) system engineered for human use. Methods and Results: Two studies were conducted to test defibrillation and detection feasibility of an SICD system located in the left chest. In the first study, 2 pockets were created in 15 canines for placement of an anterior electrode adjacent to the left edge of the sternum and a lateral electrode at the site along the axillary line between the 4th and 6th intercostal space. Stainless steel flat electrodes with active surface areas of 5, 10, 20, and 25 cm² or rod electrodes were subsequently positioned and the defibrillation threshold (DFT) was measured for multiple combinations. In the second study, the ability to induce, detect, and provide shock delivery in response to ventricular fibrillation (VF) using an SICD system engineered for clinical use was tested in 5 canines. One hundred and three DFT tests with 11 different dual electrode combinations were performed. All combinations terminated VF with a DFT of 35 ± 16 J (range: 9–79 J). Nineteen VF episodes were induced and recognized by the chronic SICD, leading to automatic capacitor charge and shock delivery in all cases. Conclusions: Subcutaneous defibrillation using different electrode combinations with shock energies less than 80 J terminated all induced VFs. An automatic SICD proved effective in detecting and activating shock delivery in all cases. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 77-82, January 2013)

Implantable cardioverter–defibrillators (ICDs) prevent sudden death from cardiac causes in selected patients but require the use of transvenous lead systems. To eliminate the need for venous access, we designed and tested an entirely subcutaneous ICD system.

The most common location of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest is the home, a situation in which emergency medical services are challenged to provide timely care. Consequently, home use of an automated external defibrillator (AED) might offer an opportunity to improve survival for patients at risk. We randomly assigned 7001 patients with previous anterior-wall myocardial infarction who were not candidates for an implantable cardioverter–defibrillator to receive one of two responses to sudden cardiac arrest occurring at home: either the control response (calling emergency medical services and performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR]) or the use of an AED, followed by calling emergency medical services and performing CPR. The primary outcome was death from any cause. The median age of the patients was 62 years; 17% were women. The median follow-up was 37.3 months. Overall, 450 patients died: 228 of 3506 patients (6.5%) in the control group and 222 of 3495 patients (6.4%) in the AED group (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.17; P=0.77). Mortality did not differ significantly in major prespecified subgroups. Only 160 deaths (35.6%) were considered to be from sudden cardiac arrest from tachyarrhythmia. Of these deaths, 117 occurred at home; 58 at-home events were witnessed. AEDs were used in 32 patients. Of these patients, 14 received an appropriate shock, and 4 survived to hospital discharge. There were no documented inappropriate shocks. For survivors of anterior-wall myocardial infarction who were not candidates for implantation of a cardioverter–defibrillator, access to a home AED did not significantly improve overall survival, as compared with reliance on conventional resuscitation methods. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00047411.)

Sudden death from cardiac causes remains a leading cause of death among patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Treatment with amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) has been proposed to improve the prognosis in such patients. We randomly assigned 2521 patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III CHF and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 35 percent or less to conventional therapy for CHF plus placebo (847 patients), conventional therapy plus amiodarone (845 patients), or conventional therapy plus a conservatively programmed, shock-only, single-lead ICD (829 patients). Placebo and amiodarone were administered in a double-blind fashion. The primary end point was death from any cause. The median LVEF in patients was 25 percent; 70 percent were in NYHA class II, and 30 percent were in class III CHF. The cause of CHF was ischemic in 52 percent and nonischemic in 48 percent. The median follow-up was 45.5 months. There were 244 deaths (29 percent) in the placebo group, 240 (28 percent) in the amiodarone group, and 182 (22 percent) in the ICD group. As compared with placebo, amiodarone was associated with a similar risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.06; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.30; P=0.53) and ICD therapy was associated with a decreased risk of death of 23 percent (0.77; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 0.62 to 0.96; P=0.007) and an absolute decrease in mortality of 7.2 percentage points after five years in the overall population. Results did not vary according to either ischemic or nonischemic causes of CHF, but they did vary according to the NYHA class. In patients with NYHA class II or III CHF and LVEF of 35 percent or less, amiodarone has no favorable effect on survival, whereas single-lead, shock-only ICD therapy reduces overall mortality by 23 percent.

Background: A unipolar defihrillation system using a single right ventricular (RV) electrode and the active shell or container of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator situated in a left infraclavicular pocket has been shown to be as efficient in defibrillation as an epicardial lead system. Additional improvements in this system would have favorable practice implications and could derive from alterations in pulse waveform shape. The specific purpose of this study is to determine whether defibrillation efficacy can be improved further in humans by lowering biphasic waveform tilt. Methods: We prospectively and randomly compared the defibrillation efficacy of a 50% and a 65% tilt asymmetric biphasic waveform using the unipolar defibrillation system in 15 consecutive cardiac arrest survivors prior to implantation of a presently available standard transvenous defibrillation system. The RV defibrillation electrode has a 5‐cm coil located on a 10.5 French lead and was used as the anode. The system cathode was the active 108 cm² surface area shell (or “CAN”) of a prototype titanium alloy pulse generator placed in the left infraclavicular pocket. The defibrillation pulse derived from a 120‐μF capacitor and was delivered from RV ± CAN, with RV positive with respect to the CAN during the initial portion of the cycle. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) stored energy, delivered energy, leading edge voltage and current, pulse resistance, and pulse width were measured for both tilts examined. Results: The unipolar single lead system, RV ± CAN, using a 65% tilt biphasic pulse resulted in a stored energy DFT of 8.7 ± 5.7 J and a delivered energy DFT of 7.6 ± 5.0 J. In ail 15 patients, stored and delivered energy DFTs were < 20 J. The 50% tilt biphasic pulse resulted in a stored energy DFT of 8.2 ± 5.4 J and a delivered energy DFT of 6.1 ± 4.0 J;P = 0.69 and 0.17, respectively. As with the 65% tilt pulse, all 15 patients had stored and delivered energy DFTs < 20 J. Conclusion: The unipolar single lead transvenous defibrillation system provides defibrillation at energy levels comparable to that reported with epicardial lead systems. This system is not improved by use of a 50% tilt biphasic waveform instead of a standard 65% tilt biphasic pulse. (PACE 1995; 18:1369–1373)