Bernd Hartmann

S of the plenary and special interest sessions, workshops, and oral and poster presentations of the 21st EBA Congress in Berlin, Germany, from 3 to 6 September 2025.

Background: Finding the optimal amount of fluid is a major challenge in burn shock. Although there is evidence that a restrictive fluid regime is beneficial, current practice shows fluid resuscitation still well above recommendations. The extent of trauma, pre-hospital care and the patient’s pre-existing conditions influence requirements. Methods: We analysed outcomes and influencing factors of fluid regimes in a retrospective cohort study including 90 severely burnt patients resuscitated with the same protocol. Results: The mean amount of fluids in the first 24 h was 6.5 mL/kg bodyweight (BW)/% total burn surface area (TBSA). A total of 14% received restrictive (6) mL/kgBW/%TBSA fluids. There was no difference regarding mortality, age, complications, organ failure, inhalation injury or full-thickness burns in the groups. Patients with excessive fluid therapy had a significantly lower ABSI score (9 vs. 11, p = 0.05) and TBSA (35 vs. 51%, p < 0.001), while patients with a restrictive fluid therapy needed fewer incidences of surgery to cover burn wounds (3.5 vs. 9.0 vs. 7.0, p = 0.008). History of liver disease or alcohol abuse tended to indicate excessive fluid administration. Patients with pre-existing heart failure received restrictive fluid therapy (23 vs. 3 vs. 4%, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Individualised, timely therapy monitoring is as essential as identifying patients with a higher or lower fluid requirement. Excessive fluid resuscitation had fewer deleterious consequences in complications than expected but seems to influence wound healing. Awareness of circumstances that prompt deviations from recommended fluid rates remains elementary.

Autologous skin substitutes represent a promising advancement in the treatment of burn injuries, offering personalized solutions for patients with extensive skin loss. This white paper synthesizes the current knowledge on laboratory-generated autologous skin substitutes in Europe, incorporating expert opinions and legal considerations. The white paper examines the scientific principles underlying autologous skin substitute development, including cell sourcing, bioengineering techniques, and clinical applications. The regulatory framework governing the production and use of these advanced therapies in Europe is also examined, highlighting challenges in standardization, safety, and approval pathways. The text features expert insights that offer a real-world perspective on the clinical viability and translational hurdles of autologous skin substitutes. The findings highlight the potential of autologous skin substitutes to improve burn treatment outcomes while emphasizing the need for harmonized regulations to facilitate clinical implementation. Despite technological advancements, significant challenges persist, including production costs, scalability, and long-term efficacy. Another focus of this white paper are the legal changes, which have significantly impacted the production and availability of these technologies. The review concludes that while autologous skin substitutes hold great promise, further research, regulatory refinement, and interdisciplinary collaboration are essential to optimize their integration into clinical practice.

Wound healing is a complex process that is still not fully understood despite extensive research. To address this, we aimed to design and characterize a standardized porcine model for the evaluation of wound healing, dressings, cell therapies, and pharmaceutical agents. Using a standardized approach, we examined the wound healing process in 1.2 mm-deep dermatome wounds at defined positions in 11 female pigs. Unlike previous studies that have only described/analyzed selected punch biopsies, we performed and described histological analyses along the complete wound length using quantitative morphometric methods. All animals remained fully healthy following surgery and showed no signs of infection. Our histopathological evaluation using a predetermined grading score and quantitative manual morphometry demonstrated the impact of different tissue sampling methods, sampling sites, and residual dermis thickness on wound healing. Our study presents a reproducible model for wound healing evaluation and demonstrates the usefulness of porcine models for assessing dermal and epidermal wound healing. The use of histological analyses over the complete wound length provides advantages over previous studies, leading to the possibility of a deeper understanding of the wound healing process. This model could potentially facilitate future research on novel wound dressings and local wound healing therapies.

Although a slight imbalance between oxidative and antioxidative mediators is part of normal physiology that enables cell aging and the removal of dead cells, burns disturb this equilibrium locally and systemically. Topical burn dressings may attenuate local and systemic oxidative stress and positively influence the post-burn clinical course. This review integrated knowledge regarding the impact of burn dressings on oxidative stress. Using keywords and in-text searches, literature was identified from PubMed, Google Scholar, and Google articles, and studies on local or topical applications of wound dressings and associated oxidative stress were selected. As im-balances between oxidative mediators and antioxidative agents significantly contribute to organ dysfunction and healing disturbance, we investigated oxidative stress on organs, metabolic changes, clinical results, and oxidative parameters influenced by applied dressings. We found positive local and systemic effects of external burn dressings in laboratory and animal tests; however, such studies were rare in humans. Nevertheless, we identified successful cases of semi-occlusive, occlusive, and biologically active dressings that reduce oxidative stress in hu-man burns. In particular, we highlight promising clinical and laboratory results from lac-tate-releasing dressings. Our review provides an invaluable resource for future development and clinical applications of burn dressings.