Gauthier Rauline
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Gauthier Rauline has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alexandre Hardy
Clinique du sport, 75005 Paris, France
1 shared publication - Brice Picot
Inter‐University Laboratory of Human Movement Biology (LIBM) Savoie Mont‐Blanc University Chambéry France
1 shared publication - Erik Anders Wikstrom
Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
1 shared publication - François Fourchet
French Society of Sports Physical Therapist, Pierrefitte-sur-Seine, France
1 shared publication - Kinan Freiha
Clinique du Sport, Paris, France
1 shared publication - Ronny Lopes
Foot and Ankle Department, Centre Orthopedique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Groupe GDS-Ramsay, Lyon, France
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 4 September 2025
- Published by Elsevier in La Revue de l'Infirmière
- Vol. 74 (313) , 25
Troubles moteurs fonctionnels : réinitialiser le cerveau par le mouvement
- 4 September 2025
- Published by Elsevier in La Revue de l'Infirmière
- Vol. 74 (313) , 25
Troubles moteurs fonctionnels : réinitialiser le cerveau par le mouvement
- Open Access
- 9 August 2024
- Published by BMJ in British Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 58 (19) , 1115-1122
Ankle-GO score is associated with the probability of becoming coper after lateral ankle sprain: a 1-year prospective cohort study
Objective To analyse the association between Ankle-GO score during the return to sport process and the probability of becoming a coper 1 year after lateral ankle sprain (LAS). Copers were defined as patients returning to their preinjury sport without loss of function and reporting no episodes of reinjury or giving-way. Methods Two months after a LAS, patients performed the Ankle-GO assessment which includes a cluster of four functional tests and two self-reported questionnaires for a maximum score of 25 points. One year after injury, participants were classified as copers or non-copers. Eight potential predictive variables associated with coper status were compared between the groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves (area under the curve (AUC)) and multivariable logistic regression models with OR and 95% CIs were used to determine the association of potential factors, including the Ankle-GO score, with copers. Results 64 patients (56% females; age 33.7±13.2 years) completed the Ankle-GO-GO at 2 months postinjury. At 1 year postinjury, 10 patients (15%) were lost to follow-up, and only 17 of 54 patients (31%) became copers. Two-month Ankle-GO score was higher among copers (9.9±4.9 points vs 6.9±3.7, p=0.015) and was associated with future coper status at 1 year (AUC=0.70). Patients with an Ankle-GO score above 11 points and male patients were more likely to become copers (OR=12.1; 95% CI 2.5 to 59, p=0.002 and OR=5.2; 95% CI 1.2 to 22.4, p=0.026, respectively). Conclusion The Ankle-GO may help identify patients more likely to become copers within a year of injury. Those with low Ankle-GO scores and female patients should receive additional rehabilitation to increase the odds of becoming a coper.
- 9 August 2024
- Published by BMJ in British Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 58 (19) , 1115-1122
Open AccessAnkle-GO score is associated with the probability of becoming coper after lateral ankle sprain: a 1-year prospective cohort study
Objective To analyse the association between Ankle-GO score during the return to sport process and the probability of becoming a coper 1 year after lateral ankle sprain (LAS). Copers were defined as patients returning to their preinjury sport without loss of function and reporting no episodes of reinjury or giving-way. Methods Two months after a LAS, patients performed the Ankle-GO assessment which includes a cluster of four functional tests and two self-reported questionnaires for a maximum score of 25 points. One year after injury, participants were classified as copers or non-copers. Eight potential predictive variables associated with coper status were compared between the groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves (area under the curve (AUC)) and multivariable logistic regression models with OR and 95% CIs were used to determine the association of potential factors, including the Ankle-GO score, with copers. Results 64 patients (56% females; age 33.7±13.2 years) completed the Ankle-GO-GO at 2 months postinjury. At 1 year postinjury, 10 patients (15%) were lost to follow-up, and only 17 of 54 patients (31%) became copers. Two-month Ankle-GO score was higher among copers (9.9±4.9 points vs 6.9±3.7, p=0.015) and was associated with future coper status at 1 year (AUC=0.70). Patients with an Ankle-GO score above 11 points and male patients were more likely to become copers (OR=12.1; 95% CI 2.5 to 59, p=0.002 and OR=5.2; 95% CI 1.2 to 22.4, p=0.026, respectively). Conclusion The Ankle-GO may help identify patients more likely to become copers within a year of injury. Those with low Ankle-GO scores and female patients should receive additional rehabilitation to increase the odds of becoming a coper.