Rajesh Seth
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Rajesh Seth has a total of 103 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Nihar Biswas
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
7 shared publications - Kerry Neil McPhedran
Department of Civil, Geological & Environmental Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
4 shared publications Nihar Biswas
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering‚ University of Windsor‚ Windsor‚ ON N9B 3P4‚ Canada
4 shared publicationsDaniel D. Heath
Univ Windsor, Great Lakes Inst Environm Res, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
3 shared publicationsDonald Mackay
Canadian Environmental Modelling Centre, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada K9J 7B8
2 shared publications- Edwin Tam
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 17 March 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Great Lakes Research
- Vol. 52 (3)
Cyanotoxins in the Great Lakes basin and their removal in drinking water treatment plants
- 17 March 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Great Lakes Research
- Vol. 52 (3)
Cyanotoxins in the Great Lakes basin and their removal in drinking water treatment plants
- 17 October 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 269-277
Biomethane Potential of Various Wastes from Ontario Vegetable Greenhouses
- 17 October 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 269-277
Biomethane Potential of Various Wastes from Ontario Vegetable Greenhouses
- Open Access
- 22 November 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Water Research X
- Vol. 26, 100285
Comprehensive evaluation of UV inactivation of E. coli using multiple gene targets and real-time quantitative PCR
- 22 November 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Water Research X
- Vol. 26, 100285
Open AccessComprehensive evaluation of UV inactivation of E. coli using multiple gene targets and real-time quantitative PCR
- Open Access
- 2 October 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Environments
- Vol. 11 (10) , 217
Challenges and Issues of Life Cycle Assessment of Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Waste
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a widely used tool to measure the environmental sustainability of products or processes. Integrating LCA into the assessment of waste diversion strategies recognizes that current waste diversion strategies are insufficient to stem the global impacts of waste effectively. The increased pressure to divert organic and inorganic materials to reduce landfills impacts and promotes the circular economy. Historically, waste diversion efforts in municipalities and industries focused on higher-profile inorganic wastes, such as plastics and other recyclables. However, organic waste is increasingly identified as a key waste fraction that must be effectively managed and regulated. This research surveys published LCAs from 2019 to 2023 focusing on the anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic waste. Notable conclusions include the lack of studies comparing AD with the latest treatment options such as co-gasification; the insufficient attention to the LCAs on biogas upgrading methods; and the monetization of LCA results using carbon credits. In addition, more than 50% of reviewed LCA studies concluded the results with a sensitivity analysis, which was not a common practice before 2019 in LCA studies on anaerobic digestion. This signifies the increasing need to understand uncertainty in the circumstances governing applying AD to wastes. Finally, neglecting the combined effect of several parameters in the sensitivity analysis might have reduced the accuracy of the sensitivity analyses in the reviewed LCAs. Overall, LCAs conducted on AD-related applications vary widely in terms of scope and consistency, implying that the outcomes may not be as applicable as intended. The identified challenges, issues, and other findings related to this research are expected to help standardize LCA procedures as applied to AD to promote greater comparability.
- 2 October 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Environments
- Vol. 11 (10) , 217
Open AccessChallenges and Issues of Life Cycle Assessment of Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Waste
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a widely used tool to measure the environmental sustainability of products or processes. Integrating LCA into the assessment of waste diversion strategies recognizes that current waste diversion strategies are insufficient to stem the global impacts of waste effectively. The increased pressure to divert organic and inorganic materials to reduce landfills impacts and promotes the circular economy. Historically, waste diversion efforts in municipalities and industries focused on higher-profile inorganic wastes, such as plastics and other recyclables. However, organic waste is increasingly identified as a key waste fraction that must be effectively managed and regulated. This research surveys published LCAs from 2019 to 2023 focusing on the anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic waste. Notable conclusions include the lack of studies comparing AD with the latest treatment options such as co-gasification; the insufficient attention to the LCAs on biogas upgrading methods; and the monetization of LCA results using carbon credits. In addition, more than 50% of reviewed LCA studies concluded the results with a sensitivity analysis, which was not a common practice before 2019 in LCA studies on anaerobic digestion. This signifies the increasing need to understand uncertainty in the circumstances governing applying AD to wastes. Finally, neglecting the combined effect of several parameters in the sensitivity analysis might have reduced the accuracy of the sensitivity analyses in the reviewed LCAs. Overall, LCAs conducted on AD-related applications vary widely in terms of scope and consistency, implying that the outcomes may not be as applicable as intended. The identified challenges, issues, and other findings related to this research are expected to help standardize LCA procedures as applied to AD to promote greater comparability.
- Open Access
- 4 September 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Challenges and Issues of Life Cycle Assessment of Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Waste
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a widely used tool to measure the environmental sustainability of products or processes. Integrating LCA into the assessment of waste diversion strategies recognizes current waste diversion strategies are insufficient to effectively stem the global impacts of waste particularly with increased pressure to recover organic and inorganic materials to reduce landfill impacts and promote the circular economy. Historically, waste diversion efforts in municipalities and industries focused on higher-profile inorganic wastes, such as plastics and other recyclables. However, organic waste is increasingly identified as a key waste fraction that must be effectively managed and regulated. This research surveys published LCA studies from 2019 to 2023 focusing on the anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic waste. Notable conclusions include the lack of studies comparing AD with the latest treatment options such as co-gasification; the insufficient attention to the LCAs on biogas upgrading methods; and the monetization of LCA results using carbon credits. In addition, more than 50% of reviewed LCA studies concluded the results with a sensitivity analysis which was not a common practice before 2019 in LCA studies in anaerobic digestion. This signifies the increasing need to understand uncertainty in the circumstances governing applying AD to wastes. Finally, neglecting the combined effect of several parameters in sensitivity analysis might have reduced the accuracy of the sensitivity analyses in the reviewed LCAs. Overall, LCAs conducted on AD-related applications vary widely in terms of scope and consistency, implying that the outcomes may not be as applicable as intended. The identified challenges, issues, and other findings related to this research are expected to help standardize LCA procedures as applied to AD to promote greater comparability.
- 4 September 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open AccessChallenges and Issues of Life Cycle Assessment of Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Waste
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a widely used tool to measure the environmental sustainability of products or processes. Integrating LCA into the assessment of waste diversion strategies recognizes current waste diversion strategies are insufficient to effectively stem the global impacts of waste particularly with increased pressure to recover organic and inorganic materials to reduce landfill impacts and promote the circular economy. Historically, waste diversion efforts in municipalities and industries focused on higher-profile inorganic wastes, such as plastics and other recyclables. However, organic waste is increasingly identified as a key waste fraction that must be effectively managed and regulated. This research surveys published LCA studies from 2019 to 2023 focusing on the anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic waste. Notable conclusions include the lack of studies comparing AD with the latest treatment options such as co-gasification; the insufficient attention to the LCAs on biogas upgrading methods; and the monetization of LCA results using carbon credits. In addition, more than 50% of reviewed LCA studies concluded the results with a sensitivity analysis which was not a common practice before 2019 in LCA studies in anaerobic digestion. This signifies the increasing need to understand uncertainty in the circumstances governing applying AD to wastes. Finally, neglecting the combined effect of several parameters in sensitivity analysis might have reduced the accuracy of the sensitivity analyses in the reviewed LCAs. Overall, LCAs conducted on AD-related applications vary widely in terms of scope and consistency, implying that the outcomes may not be as applicable as intended. The identified challenges, issues, and other findings related to this research are expected to help standardize LCA procedures as applied to AD to promote greater comparability.
- 14 September 2022
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 425-428
Biomethane Recovery from Brewer’s Yeast Using Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion
- 14 September 2022
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 425-428
Biomethane Recovery from Brewer’s Yeast Using Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion
- 27 July 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Water Research
- Vol. 222, 118913
Variation in the diversity of bacterial communities and potential sources of fecal contamination of beaches in the Huron to Erie corridor
- 27 July 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Water Research
- Vol. 222, 118913
Variation in the diversity of bacterial communities and potential sources of fecal contamination of beaches in the Huron to Erie corridor
- 1 June 2022
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Environmental Engineering
- Vol. 148 (6) , 04022020
Usage of Oleic and Stearic Acids in Mixed Anaerobic Culture for Sulfate Reduction While Inhibiting Methanogenesis
In a mixed anaerobic biotreatment process, sulfate is converted into sulfide by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). Sulfidogens and methanogens in a mixed anaerobic culture can compete for electrons. Diverting a larger fraction of electrons into the sulfate-reduction process can inhibit methanogens and increase overall anaerobic digestion process efficiency. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficiency of SRB in the sulfate-reduction process in presence of two 18 carbon long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs), namely oleic acid (OA), and stearic acid (SA), under mesophilic conditions. Sulfate reduction was examined using glucose in a mixed mesophilic anaerobic culture at 37°C and neutral pH in the presence OA and SA. The control experiments with LCFAs plus sulfate and sulfate alone showed no improvement in sulfate reduction due to the addition of LCFAs (OA and SA), with sulfate reductions of 10% and 9% over 7 days, respectively. In control experiments with glucose and sulfate, sulfate reduction was around 32% over the same period. In experiments with glucose and sulfate, increasing OA concentrations resulted in an increase in electron flux to sulfidogenesis, while negatively impacting glucose degradation rates. Maximum sulfate reduction of 73% over 7 days was observed at the highest OA concentration of , which is about a threefold improvement over the control. Despite methanogenic inhibition and diversion of electron flow toward sulfate reduction in the presence of OA, no was detected. In contrast to OA, no significant increase in sulfate reduction was observed with increasing concentration of SA, up to the maximum tested concentration of . In general, the findings indicate that OA can be effective in redirecting more electrons and thus improving sulfate reduction during the anaerobic treatment process.- 1 June 2022
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Environmental Engineering
- Vol. 148 (6) , 04022020
Usage of Oleic and Stearic Acids in Mixed Anaerobic Culture for Sulfate Reduction While Inhibiting Methanogenesis
In a mixed anaerobic biotreatment process, sulfate is converted into sulfide by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). Sulfidogens and methanogens in a mixed anaerobic culture can compete for electrons. Diverting a larger fraction of electrons into the sulfate-reduction process can inhibit methanogens and increase overall anaerobic digestion process efficiency. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficiency of SRB in the sulfate-reduction process in presence of two 18 carbon long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs), namely oleic acid (OA), and stearic acid (SA), under mesophilic conditions. Sulfate reduction was examined using glucose in a mixed mesophilic anaerobic culture at 37°C and neutral pH in the presence OA and SA. The control experiments with LCFAs plus sulfate and sulfate alone showed no improvement in sulfate reduction due to the addition of LCFAs (OA and SA), with sulfate reductions of 10% and 9% over 7 days, respectively. In control experiments with glucose and sulfate, sulfate reduction was around 32% over the same period. In experiments with glucose and sulfate, increasing OA concentrations resulted in an increase in electron flux to sulfidogenesis, while negatively impacting glucose degradation rates. Maximum sulfate reduction of 73% over 7 days was observed at the highest OA concentration of , which is about a threefold improvement over the control. Despite methanogenic inhibition and diversion of electron flow toward sulfate reduction in the presence of OA, no was detected. In contrast to OA, no significant increase in sulfate reduction was observed with increasing concentration of SA, up to the maximum tested concentration of . In general, the findings indicate that OA can be effective in redirecting more electrons and thus improving sulfate reduction during the anaerobic treatment process.- 1 May 2022
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
- Vol. 49 (5) , 675-682
Influence of mix ratio of potato peel and pig manure on reaction kinetics and methane recovery from anaerobic co-digestion
The potential improvement in methane recovery and reaction kinetics from different mixes of potato peel (PP) and pig manure (PM) in a single stage anaerobic co-digestion/mono-digestion process was investigated in a laboratory study. The highest methane yield of 231 mL/g TCODadded was observed in the 50:50 mix of potato peel and pig manure. Compared to the mono-digested substrates, co-digestion of PP and PM at 75:25, 50:50, and 25:75 synergistically improved methane yield by 17%, 25%, and 11%, respectively. The co-digested mixes also produced methane at a faster rate, with the fastest methane production rate occurring at the 50:50 mix. Thus, co-digestion of potato peel and pig manure enhanced the methane yield and reaction kinetics. Hence, co-digestion rather than mono-digestion should be actively considered when a carbon rich waste (such as potato peel) and nutrient rich waste (such as pig manure) are available within reasonable proximity.
- 1 May 2022
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
- Vol. 49 (5) , 675-682
Influence of mix ratio of potato peel and pig manure on reaction kinetics and methane recovery from anaerobic co-digestion
The potential improvement in methane recovery and reaction kinetics from different mixes of potato peel (PP) and pig manure (PM) in a single stage anaerobic co-digestion/mono-digestion process was investigated in a laboratory study. The highest methane yield of 231 mL/g TCODadded was observed in the 50:50 mix of potato peel and pig manure. Compared to the mono-digested substrates, co-digestion of PP and PM at 75:25, 50:50, and 25:75 synergistically improved methane yield by 17%, 25%, and 11%, respectively. The co-digested mixes also produced methane at a faster rate, with the fastest methane production rate occurring at the 50:50 mix. Thus, co-digestion of potato peel and pig manure enhanced the methane yield and reaction kinetics. Hence, co-digestion rather than mono-digestion should be actively considered when a carbon rich waste (such as potato peel) and nutrient rich waste (such as pig manure) are available within reasonable proximity.
- Open Access
Averting an outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in a university residence hall through wastewater surveillance
A wastewater surveillance program targeting a university residence hall was implemented during the spring semester 2021 as a proactive measure to avoid an outbreak of COVID-19 on campus. Over a period of 7 weeks from early February through late March 2021, wastewater originating from the residence hall was collected as grab samples 3 times per week. During this time, there was no detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR in the residence hall wastewater stream. Aiming to obtain a sample more representative of the residence hall community, a decision was made to use passive samplers beginning in late March onwards. Adopting a Moore Swab approach, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in wastewater samples on just two days after passive samplers were activated. These samples were also positive for the B.1.1.7 (Alpha) Variant of Concern (VOC) by RT-qPCR. The positive result triggered a public health case finding response including a mobile testing unit deployed to the residence hall the following day with testing of nearly 200 students and staff, which identified two laboratory-confirmed cases of B.1.1.7 variant COVID-19. These individuals were re-located to a separate quarantine facility averting an outbreak on campus. Aggregating wastewater and clinical data, the campus wastewater surveillance program has yielded the first estimates of fecal shedding rates of the B.1.1.7 VOC of SARS-CoV-2 in individuals from a non-clinical setting.
Open AccessAverting an outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in a university residence hall through wastewater surveillance
A wastewater surveillance program targeting a university residence hall was implemented during the spring semester 2021 as a proactive measure to avoid an outbreak of COVID-19 on campus. Over a period of 7 weeks from early February through late March 2021, wastewater originating from the residence hall was collected as grab samples 3 times per week. During this time, there was no detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR in the residence hall wastewater stream. Aiming to obtain a sample more representative of the residence hall community, a decision was made to use passive samplers beginning in late March onwards. Adopting a Moore Swab approach, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in wastewater samples on just two days after passive samplers were activated. These samples were also positive for the B.1.1.7 (Alpha) Variant of Concern (VOC) by RT-qPCR. The positive result triggered a public health case finding response including a mobile testing unit deployed to the residence hall the following day with testing of nearly 200 students and staff, which identified two laboratory-confirmed cases of B.1.1.7 variant COVID-19. These individuals were re-located to a separate quarantine facility averting an outbreak on campus. Aggregating wastewater and clinical data, the campus wastewater surveillance program has yielded the first estimates of fecal shedding rates of the B.1.1.7 VOC of SARS-CoV-2 in individuals from a non-clinical setting.