Jan Gulliksen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Jan Gulliksen has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bengt Sandblad
Department of Human Computer Interaction , Uppsala University , Uppsala, Sweden
2 shared publications - Andy Smith
Thames Valley University, St Mary’s Road, Ealing, London, UK
1 shared publication - Asbjørn Følstad
SINTEF
1 shared publication Eva Olsson
1 shared publicationHans Andersson
Human Kind Business Development
1 shared publicationIda Bark
SINTEF
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 23 February 2009
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Behaviour & Information Technology
- Vol. 28 (2) , 101-120
User certification of workplace software: assessing both artefact and usage
This article summarises activities and results from the quality assessment project ‘Quality Assurance of IT Support at Work’ (ITQ) which has been performed by Swedish researchers in close cooperation with trade unions 1999–2005. The ITQ project is part of a network, UsersAward, which works for the goal to develop and implement a strategy for good software products on the work floor. A main result of the ITQ project is the first version of a software certification programme, User Certified 2002, which is described in some detail. The underlying theoretical arguments for its design and the performed pilot projects which have informed its implementation are also presented. The outcome of performed certifications is discussed in terms of stakeholder response; in terms of whether to certify artefact, processes, or both; and in terms of the relationship between software certification, standardisation, and public procurement agreements. One conclusion from the project is that a viable software certification programme has to cover the software's built-in features, its deployment process, and its actual situated usage. A second conclusion is that the buying organisation has to implement integrative processes in which its organisational development and its implementation of IT systems are coordinated. Conclusions are also drawn with respect to the set of organisational patterns underlying the UsersAward initiative – certifications, user panels, user surveys, user conferences and a yearly IT Prize contest. Finally, implications and plans for the future, especially international research and union cooperation activities, and further development of the certification process are described.
- 23 February 2009
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Behaviour & Information Technology
- Vol. 28 (2) , 101-120
User certification of workplace software: assessing both artefact and usage
This article summarises activities and results from the quality assessment project ‘Quality Assurance of IT Support at Work’ (ITQ) which has been performed by Swedish researchers in close cooperation with trade unions 1999–2005. The ITQ project is part of a network, UsersAward, which works for the goal to develop and implement a strategy for good software products on the work floor. A main result of the ITQ project is the first version of a software certification programme, User Certified 2002, which is described in some detail. The underlying theoretical arguments for its design and the performed pilot projects which have informed its implementation are also presented. The outcome of performed certifications is discussed in terms of stakeholder response; in terms of whether to certify artefact, processes, or both; and in terms of the relationship between software certification, standardisation, and public procurement agreements. One conclusion from the project is that a viable software certification programme has to cover the software's built-in features, its deployment process, and its actual situated usage. A second conclusion is that the buying organisation has to implement integrative processes in which its organisational development and its implementation of IT systems are coordinated. Conclusions are also drawn with respect to the set of organisational patterns underlying the UsersAward initiative – certifications, user panels, user surveys, user conferences and a yearly IT Prize contest. Finally, implications and plans for the future, especially international research and union cooperation activities, and further development of the certification process are described.
- 19 December 2007
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 219-232
Building Usability in India: Reflections from the Indo-European Systems Usability Partnership
- 19 December 2007
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 219-232
Building Usability in India: Reflections from the Indo-European Systems Usability Partnership
- 19 December 2007
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 201-217
Use and Usefulness of HCI Methods: Results from an Exploratory Study among Nordic HCI Practitioners
- 19 December 2007
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 201-217
Use and Usefulness of HCI Methods: Results from an Exploratory Study among Nordic HCI Practitioners
- 1 March 2004
- Published by Springer Nature in Universal Access in the Information Society
- Vol. 3 (1) , 6-16
The software accessibility of human-computer interfaces?ISO Technical Specification 16071
- 1 March 2004
- Published by Springer Nature in Universal Access in the Information Society
- Vol. 3 (1) , 6-16
The software accessibility of human-computer interfaces?ISO Technical Specification 16071
- 1 March 2004
- Published by Springer Nature in Universal Access in the Information Society
- Vol. 3 (1) , 96-101
Accomplishing universal access through system reachability?a management perspective
- 1 March 2004
- Published by Springer Nature in Universal Access in the Information Society
- Vol. 3 (1) , 96-101
Accomplishing universal access through system reachability?a management perspective
- 1 September 2001
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Information Technology & People
- Vol. 14 (3) , 261-272
Workspaces enhance efficiency – theories, concepts and a case study
Traditional process‐oriented system development methods often result in fragmentary user interfaces with information presented in various windows without considerations of requirements for simultaneous viewing. Opening, closing, moving and resizing these windows attracts the users’ attention away from the actual work. User interface design according to the workspace metaphor could provide skilled professional users with an efficient, customised user interface to administrative information systems. This can improve work performance and facilitate efficient navigation between workspaces. A case study in co‐operation with the Swedish National Tax Board (RSV) describes practical use of the workspace metaphor.
- 1 September 2001
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Information Technology & People
- Vol. 14 (3) , 261-272
Workspaces enhance efficiency – theories, concepts and a case study
Traditional process‐oriented system development methods often result in fragmentary user interfaces with information presented in various windows without considerations of requirements for simultaneous viewing. Opening, closing, moving and resizing these windows attracts the users’ attention away from the actual work. User interface design according to the workspace metaphor could provide skilled professional users with an efficient, customised user interface to administrative information systems. This can improve work performance and facilitate efficient navigation between workspaces. A case study in co‐operation with the Swedish National Tax Board (RSV) describes practical use of the workspace metaphor.