Knut Akesson

The Conflict-Free Electric Vehicle Routing Problem (CF-EVRP) is a combinatorial optimization problem of designing routes for vehicles to execute tasks such that a cost function, typically the number of vehicles or the total travelled distance, is minimized. The CF-EVRP involves constraints such as time windows on the tasks’ execution, limited operating range of the vehicles, and limited capacity on the number of vehicles that a road segment can simultaneously accommodate. In previous work, the compositional algorithm ComSat was introduced to solve the CF-EVRP by breaking it down into sub-problems and iteratively solve them to build an overall solution. Though ComSat showed good performance in general, some problem instances took significant time to solve due to the high number of iterations required to find solutions for two sub-problems, namely the Routing Problem, and the Paths Changing Problem. This paper addresses the bottlenecks of ComSat and presents new formulations for both sub-problems in order to reduce the number of iterations required to find feasible solutions to the CF-EVRP. Experiments on sets of benchmark instances show the effectiveness of the presented improvements.

Falsification is a testing method that aims to increase confidence in the correctness of cyber–physical systems by guiding the search for counterexamples with some optimization algorithm. This method generates input signals for a simulation of the system under test and employs quantitative semantics, which serves as objective functions, to minimize the distance needed to falsify a specification. Various implementations based on different optimization strategies and semantics have been proposed and evaluated in the past. Generally, they assume that an input generator is given. However, this is often not the case in practice and different choices can lead to vastly different outcomes. Therefore, this article introduces and evaluates various parameterizations of input generators, including pulse, sinusoidal, and piecewise signals with different interpolation techniques. These input generators are compared based on their performance on benchmark examples, as well as coverage measures in the space-time and frequency domains. Input generators facilitate the exploration of numerous different input signals within a single falsification problem, making them especially valuable for industrial practitioners seeking to incorporate falsification into their daily development work.

Cyber-physical systems (CPSs) are usually complex and safety-critical; hence, it is difficult and important to guarantee that the system's requirements, i.e., specifications, are fulfilled. Simulation-based falsification of CPSs is a practical testing method that can be used to raise confidence in the correctness of the system by only requiring that the system under test can be simulated. As each simulation is typically computationally intensive, an important step is to reduce the number of simulations needed to falsify a specification. We study Bayesian optimization (BO), a sample-efficient method that learns a surrogate model that describes the relationship between the parametrization of possible input signals and the evaluation of the specification. In this paper, we improve the falsification using BO by; first adopting two prominent BO methods, one fits local surrogate models, and the other exploits the user's prior knowledge. Secondly, the formulation of acquisition functions for falsification is addressed in this paper. Benchmark evaluation shows significant improvements in using local surrogate models of BO for falsifying benchmark examples that were previously hard to falsify. Using prior knowledge in the falsification process is shown to be particularly important when the simulation budget is limited. For some of the benchmark problems, the choice of acquisition function clearly affects the number of simulations needed for successful falsification.

Bin packing and bin covering are important optimization problems in many industrial fields, such as packaging, recycling, and food processing. The problem concerns a set of items, each with its own value, that are to be sorted into bins in such a way that the total value of each bin, as measured by the sum of its item values, is not above (for packing) or below (for covering) a given target value. The optimization problem concerns minimizing, for bin packing, or maximizing, for bin covering, the number of bins. This is a combinatorial NP-hard problem, for which true optimal solutions can only be calculated in specific cases, such as when restricted to a small number of items. To get around this problem, many suboptimal approaches exist. This article describes the formulations of the bin packing and covering problems that allow finding the true optimum, for instance, counting hundreds of items using general-purpose MILP-solvers. Also presented are suboptimal solutions that come within less than 10% of the optimum while taking significantly less time to calculate, even ten to 100 times faster, depending on the required accuracy.

Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) are systems with both physical and software components, for example cars and industrial robots. Since these systems exhibit both discrete and continuous dynamics, they are complex and it is thus difficult to verify that they behave as expected. Falsification of temporal logic properties is an approach to find counterexamples to CPSs by means of simulation. In this paper, we propose two additions to enhance the capability of falsification and make it more viable in a large-scale industrial setting. The first addition is a framework for transforming specifications from a signal-based model into Signal Temporal Logic. The second addition is the use of Valued Booleans and an additive robust semantics in the falsification process. We evaluate the performance of the additive robust semantics on a set of benchmark models, and we can see that which semantics are preferable depend both on the model and on the specification.

In order to develop a computationally efficient implementation of the maximally permissive deadlock avoidance policy (DAP) for complex resource allocation systems (RAS), a recent approach focuses on the identification of a set of critical states of the underlying RAS state-space, referred to as minimal boundary unsafe states. The availability of this information enables an expedient one-step-lookahead scheme that prevents the RAS from reaching outside its safe region. The work presented in this paper seeks to develop a symbolic approach, based on binary decision diagrams (BDDs), for efficiently retrieving the (minimal) boundary unsafe states from the underlying RAS state-space. The presented results clearly demonstrate that symbolic computation enables the deployment of the maximally permissive DAP for complex RAS with very large structure and state-spaces with limited time and memory requirements. Furthermore, the involved computational costs are substantially reduced through the pertinent exploitation of the special structure that exists in the considered problem. Note to Practitioners-A key component of the real-time control of many flexibly automated operations is the management of the allocation of a finite set of reusable resources among a set of concurrently executing processes so that this allocation remains deadlock-free. The corresponding problem is known as deadlock avoidance, and its resolution in a way that retains the sought operational flexibilities has been a challenging problem due to: (i) the inability to easily foresee the longer-term implications of an imminent allocation and (ii) the very large sizes of the relevant state spaces that prevent an online assessment of these implications through exhaustive enumeration. A recent methodology has sought to address these complications through the offline identification and storage of a set of critical states in the underlying state space that renders efficient the safety assessment of any given resource allocation. The results presented in this paper further extend and strengthen this methodology by complementing it with techniques borrowed from the area of symbolic computation; these techniques enable a more compressed representation of the underlying state spaces and of the various subsets and operations that are involved in the pursued computation.

A generic state-vector transition (SVT) model is suggested, including a flexible synchronous composition involving both shared variables and events. This model is analyzed, focusing on properties that are important for supervisor synthesis. A synthesis procedure is then developed for the SVT model, where supervisor guards are generated that guarantee a controllable, nonblocking and maximally permissive supervisor. Novel conditions are introduced, such that more flexible specifications can be applied than earlier suggested for related models. Since the SVT model includes automata and (colored) Petri nets, optionally extended with variables, guards and actions, as special cases, the suggested synthesis approach unifies supervisor synthesis for the main discrete event model classes. Finally, the SVT model is naturally represented and efficiently computed based on binary decision diagrams, and the resulting supervisor guards are easily implemented in industrial control systems.