Andrea L. Wilson
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Andrea L. Wilson has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Mark M. Stevens
Yanco Agricultural Institute
2 shared publications - Alistar I. Robertson
AAustralian Institute of Marine Science, PMB 3, Townsville MC, Qld 4810, Australia
1 shared publication - Allan Curtis
Bureau of Rural Sciences, Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry-Australia, P.O. Box E11, Kingston, ACT 2604, Australia
1 shared publication - Amy Jansen
Johnstone Centre, School of Science and Technology, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia
1 shared publication - Darren S. Ryder
University of New England
1 shared publication - David Priddel
Office of Environment and Heritage, PO Box 1967, Hurstville, NSW 2220, Australia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 10 May 2011
- Published by Wiley in Ecological Management & Restoration
- Vol. 12 (2) , 102-109
Eradication of the House Mouse (Mus musculus) from Montague Island, New South Wales, Australia
- 10 May 2011
- Published by Wiley in Ecological Management & Restoration
- Vol. 12 (2) , 102-109
Eradication of the House Mouse (Mus musculus) from Montague Island, New South Wales, Australia
- 24 August 2007
- Published by Wiley in Ecological Research
- Vol. 23 (3) , 565-572
Effects of different management regimes on aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity in Australian rice fields
The maintenance of invertebrate diversity within agricultural environments can enhance a number of agronomically important processes, such as nutrient cycling and biological pest control. However, few Australian studies have been undertaken which specifically address the effects of commercial management regimes on rice field biodiversity. In this study, we compared aquatic macroinvertebrate communities within Australian rice fields cultivated under three commercial management regimes: conventional‐aerial (agrochemicals applied, aerially sown), conventional‐drill (agrochemicals applied, directly drill‐sown) and organic‐drill (agrochemical‐free, directly drill‐sown). These comparisons were undertaken using a combination of community assessment approaches, including morphospecies richness, abundance, diversity and community composition. In general, greater biodiversity existed within macroinvertebrate communities that developed under organic management regimes than under conventional regimes (i.e., higher morphospecies richness and Shannon diversity). Although there were significant differences in several parameters across management regimes early in the rice‐growing season, as the growing season progressed the invertebrate communities that developed in the different management regimes became more similar. Only community composition analyses showed significant differences late in the growing season, with functional differences across aquatic faunal assemblages suggested by increased predator abundance in communities sampled from the organic management regime. In order to improve biodiversity within these aquatic environments, management techniques need to be examined individually and the most disruptive processes identified. Alternative management procedures can then be developed that minimise biodiversity loss whilst still delivering required agronomic outcomes.
- 24 August 2007
- Published by Wiley in Ecological Research
- Vol. 23 (3) , 565-572
Effects of different management regimes on aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity in Australian rice fields
The maintenance of invertebrate diversity within agricultural environments can enhance a number of agronomically important processes, such as nutrient cycling and biological pest control. However, few Australian studies have been undertaken which specifically address the effects of commercial management regimes on rice field biodiversity. In this study, we compared aquatic macroinvertebrate communities within Australian rice fields cultivated under three commercial management regimes: conventional‐aerial (agrochemicals applied, aerially sown), conventional‐drill (agrochemicals applied, directly drill‐sown) and organic‐drill (agrochemical‐free, directly drill‐sown). These comparisons were undertaken using a combination of community assessment approaches, including morphospecies richness, abundance, diversity and community composition. In general, greater biodiversity existed within macroinvertebrate communities that developed under organic management regimes than under conventional regimes (i.e., higher morphospecies richness and Shannon diversity). Although there were significant differences in several parameters across management regimes early in the rice‐growing season, as the growing season progressed the invertebrate communities that developed in the different management regimes became more similar. Only community composition analyses showed significant differences late in the growing season, with functional differences across aquatic faunal assemblages suggested by increased predator abundance in communities sampled from the organic management regime. In order to improve biodiversity within these aquatic environments, management techniques need to be examined individually and the most disruptive processes identified. Alternative management procedures can then be developed that minimise biodiversity loss whilst still delivering required agronomic outcomes.
- 1 August 2006
- Published by Wiley in Ecological Management & Restoration
- Vol. 7 (2) , 123-129
Measuring riparian condition: A comparison of assessments by landholders and scientists
- 1 August 2006
- Published by Wiley in Ecological Management & Restoration
- Vol. 7 (2) , 123-129
Measuring riparian condition: A comparison of assessments by landholders and scientists
- 1 June 2005
- Published by Springer Nature in Aquatic Ecology
- Vol. 39 (2) , 189-200
Stable isotope analysis of aquatic invertebrate communities in irrigated rice fields cultivated under different management regimes
- 1 June 2005
- Published by Springer Nature in Aquatic Ecology
- Vol. 39 (2) , 189-200
Stable isotope analysis of aquatic invertebrate communities in irrigated rice fields cultivated under different management regimes
- 1 April 2004
- Published by Wiley in Ecological Management & Restoration
- Vol. 5 (1) , 73-75
Triage: Appropriate for prioritizing community funded river restoration projects, but not for advancing the science of river restoration
- 1 April 2004
- Published by Wiley in Ecological Management & Restoration
- Vol. 5 (1) , 73-75
Triage: Appropriate for prioritizing community funded river restoration projects, but not for advancing the science of river restoration