AHA. Hetzel

A. Hetzel

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


A. Hetzel has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • M. Reinhard

    Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Freiburg, Germany

    3 shared publications
  • B. Guschlbauer

    From the Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology (M. Reinhard, B.G., A.H.) and Center for Data Analysis and Modeling (M. Roth, T.M., J.T.), University of Freiburg, Germany; and Department of Neurophysics (M.C.), Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, UK

    2 shared publications
  • J. Timmer

    From the Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology (M. Reinhard, B.G., A.H.) and Center for Data Analysis and Modeling (M. Roth, T.M., J.T.), University of Freiburg, Germany; and Department of Neurophysics (M.C.), Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, UK

    2 shared publications
  • M. Czosnyka

    From the Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology (M. Reinhard, B.G., A.H.) and Center for Data Analysis and Modeling (M. Roth, T.M., J.T.), University of Freiburg, Germany; and Department of Neurophysics (M.C.), Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, UK

    2 shared publications
  • M. Roth

    From the Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology (M. Reinhard, B.G., A.H.) and Center for Data Analysis and Modeling (M. Roth, T.M., J.T.), University of Freiburg, Germany; and Department of Neurophysics (M.C.), Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, UK

    2 shared publications
  • S. Braune

    Department of Neurology, Neurocenter, University of Freiburg, Breisacherstr. 64, 79106 Freiburg, Germany

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy or Stenting on Impairment of Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation

    by M. Reinhard, M. Roth, T. MülLer, B. Guschlbauer, J. Timmer, M. Czosnyka, A. Hetzel

    Background and Purpose— Analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (DCA) from spontaneous blood pressure fluctuations might contribute to prognosis of severe internal carotid artery stenosis, but its response to carotid recanalization has not been investigated so far. This study investigates the effect of carotid endarterectomy or stenting on various DCA parameters. Methods— In 58 patients with severe unilateral stenosis undergoing carotid endarterectomy (n=41) or stenting (n=17), cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV, transcranial Doppler) and arterial blood pressure (ABP, Finapres method) were recorded over 10 minutes before and on average 3 days after carotid recanalization. Nineteen patients were additionally examined after 7 months. Correlations between diastolic and mean ABP and CBFV fluctuations were averaged to form the correlation coefficient indices (diastolic [Dx] and mean values [Mx]). Transfer function parameters (low-frequency phase and high-frequency gain between ABP and CBFV oscillations) were calculated over the same 10 minutes. CO 2 reactivity was assessed via inhalation of 7% CO 2 . Results— Before recanalization, all DCA parameters were clearly impaired ipsilaterally compared with contralateral sides. Phase, Dx, and Mx indicated early normalization of DCA after both endarterectomy and stenting. By multiple regression, the degree of DCA improvement was highly significantly related to the extent of impairment before recanalization. No significant change in DCA was found at follow-up. Ipsilateral gain and CO 2 reactivity increased significantly less after endarterectomy than after stenting ( P Conclusions— Dynamic cerebral dysautoregulation in patients with severe carotid obstruction is readily and completely remedied by carotid recanalization.


  • Cerebral Autoregulation in Carotid Artery Occlusive Disease Assessed From Spontaneous Blood Pressure Fluctuations by the Correlation Coefficient Index

    by M. Reinhard, M. Roth, T. Müller, M. Czosnyka, J. Timmer, A. Hetzel

    Background and Purpose— Estimation of dynamic cerebral autoregulation from spontaneous fluctuations of arterial blood pressure (ABP) and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) is an attractive monitoring option for cerebral hemodynamic impairment. We evaluated the correlation coefficient index method in patients with severe obstructive carotid disease and compared it with transfer function analysis (frequency domain approach to cerebral autoregulation) and CO 2 vasomotor reactivity. Methods— In 139 patients with severe unilateral carotid stenosis (≥70%) or occlusion, CBFV (transcranial Doppler) and ABP (Finapres method) were recorded over 10 minutes. Correlations between systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, and mean ABP and CBFV oscillations over 1-minute epochs were averaged over 10 minutes to form the correlation coefficient indexes (Sx, Dx, Mx, respectively). Transfer function parameters (phase shift and gain between ABP and CBFV oscillations) were determined from the entire 10-minute period. CO 2 reactivity was assessed by inhalation of 7% CO 2 . Results— The correlation indexes Dx and Mx were significantly higher ipsilateral to stenosis and increased with degree of stenosis, indicating increasing dependence of CBFV on ABP and thus impairment of cerebral autoregulation. Dx and Mx correlated moderately but highly significantly with transfer function parameters and CO 2 reactivity and showed a good level of agreement in detecting pathological values. Patients with a small variance of the 1-minute source correlations of Dx and Mx showed clearly better correlation values. Transfer function parameters and CO 2 reactivity but not Dx and Mx were significantly poorer in patients with symptomatic stenosis or occlusion. Conclusions— The potential of the correlation coefficient indexes Dx and Mx in detecting hemodynamic impairment in patients with carotid stenosis is comparable to that of transfer function analysis and CO 2 reactivity testing. In future, a combination of various hemodynamic tests might help to identify patients at risk for ischemic events.


  • Challenging cerebral autoregulation in patients with preganglionic autonomic failure

    by A. Hetzel, M. Reinhard, B. Guschlbauer, S. Braune

    Intact cerebral autoregulation is essential to prevent cerebral hypoperfusion during pronounced changes in arterial blood pressure (ABP) in patients with autonomic failure (AF). It is still a matter of debate whether and to what extent cerebral autoregula-tion is disturbed in these patients. This study evaluates the interaction between cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and ABP during Valsalva maneuver (VM) and tilt-table testing in nine patients with multiple system atrophy including AF and in 14 age-matched controls. CBFV and ABP were recorded noninvasively using transcranial Doppler sonography and the Finapres device. Responses to VM were graded by the autoregulation slope index (ASI). Cerebrovascular resistance changes were estimated by the conventional ratio ABP/CBFV and by the dynamic pressure-velocity relationship. To challenge cerebral autoregulation further, tests were repeated under hypercapnic predilation of cerebral arterioles. During VM, CBFV reincreased in patients despite a pronounced ABP drop and showed an overshoot after the strain, thus, being similar to controls. The ASI was higher in patients than in controls (p < 0.05). During 70° head-up tilt, ABP dropped markedly, but the decrease in CBFV was small and did not differ significantly from controls. In patients, both tests were associated with a substantial decrease of the dynamic but not of the conventional pressure-velocity relationship. Under hypercapnia, the CBFV response in patients remained unchanged. We conclude that 1) cerebral arterioles have the capacity for adequate vasodilation during ABP drops in patients with AF and that this ability is still present under hypercapnic predilation. 2) The mechanism of cerebral autoregulation in itself does not seem to be affected by the AF but is rather well exercised. 3) The VM presents, in addition to tilt-table testing, a simple test for clinical evaluation of cerebral autoregulation in patients with AF.