Timothy R. Rebbeck

1501 Background: Women with B1 and B2 mutation are at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer, which is significantly reduced by RRSO. The reduction in breast cancer risk may be greatest prior to age 40; however, such early menopause can lead to significant menopausal symptoms and other health problems. Two small prior studies have suggested that HRT following RRSO does not increase the risk of breast cancer, but further data are needed. Methods: From the PROSE consortium, 1,299 B1 (n= 795) and B2 (n=504) mutation carriers who underwent RRSO following study ascertainment and in whom HRT status was known were followed prospectively. Data were collected on HRT use and subsequent breast cancer diagnosis. Results: In both B1 and B2 mutation carriers with ever use of HRT following RRSO, no increased risk of breast cancer was observed compared to those with no RRSO. In B1 carriers, HRT use both with (HR 0.52) and without (HR 0.29) RRSO was associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer. No increased risk of breast cancer was seen with either combination HRT or estrogen-only HRT. Conclusions: In this prospective study of 1,299 B1 and B2 mutation carriers, HRT following RRSO was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer.

Combined hormone replacement therapy (CHRT) containing estrogens and progestins is associated with breast cancer risk. The authors evaluated interactions between CHRT use and progestin metabolism genotypes at CYP3A4 and the progesterone receptor (PGR) and their effects on breast cancer risk using the population-based Women's Insights and Shared Experiences (WISE) Study (1999–2002) of postmenopausal Caucasian women (522 breast cancer cases, 708 controls). The authors observed an elevated risk of ductal tumors in women with 3 or more years of CHRT use and PGR 331A alleles compared with those who had neither factor (odds ratio = 3.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13, 9.99; two-sided p_interaction = 0.035). They also observed an elevated risk of progesterone receptor-positive tumors in women who had had 3 or more years of CHRT use and PGR 331A alleles compared with those who had neither factor (odds ratio = 3.82, 95% CI: 1.26, 11.55; p = 0.028). Finally, they observed an increased risk of estrogen receptor-negative tumors in women without CHRT exposure and CYP3A4*1B alleles compared with those who had neither factor (odds ratio = 6.46, 95% CI: 2.02, 20.66; p = 0.024), although the biologic interpretation of this result requires further study. When stratified by recency of use, PGR effects were observed only in current CHRT users, while CYP3A4 effects were observed only in former CHRT users. Breast cancer risk in women who have used CHRT may be influenced by genetic factors involved in progestin metabolism.

Estrogen exposures have been associated with breast cancer risk, and genes involved in estrogen metabolism have been reported to mediate that risk. Our goal was to better understand whether combinations of candidate estrogen metabolism genotypes are associated with breast cancer etiology. A population-based case-control study in three counties of the Philadelphia Metropolitan area was undertaken. We evaluated seven main effects and 21 first-order interactions in African Americans and European Americans for genotypes at COMT, CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, CYP3A4, SULT1A1, and SULT1E1 in 878 breast cancer cases and 1,409 matched random digit–dialed controls. In European Americans, we observed main effect associations of genotypes containing any CYP1A1*2C (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.67) and breast cancer. No significant main effects were observed in African Americans. Three significant first-order interactions were observed. In European Americans, interactions between SULT1A1*2 and CYP1A1*2C genotypes (P_interaction < 0.001) and between SULT1E1 and CYP1A2*1F genotypes were observed (P_interaction = 0.006). In African Americans, an interaction between SULT1A1*2 and CYP1B1*4 was observed (P_interaction = 0.041). We applied the false-positive report probability approach, which suggested that these associations were noteworthy; however, we cannot rule out the possibility that chance led to these associations. Pending future confirmation of these results, our data suggest that breast cancer etiology in both European American and African American postmenopausal women may involve the interaction of a gene responsible for the generation of catecholestrogens with a gene involved in estrogen and catecholestrogen sulfation. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(3):444–50)

Hormone‐related supplements (HRS), many of which contain phytoestrogens, are widely used to manage menopausal symptoms, yet their relationship with breast cancer risk has generally not been evaluated. We evaluated whether use of HRS was associated with breast cancer risk, using a population‐based case–control study in 3 counties of the Philadelphia metropolitan area consisting of 949 breast cancer cases and 1,524 controls. Use of HRS varied significantly by race, with African American women being more likely than European American women to use any herbal preparation (19.2% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.003) as well as specific preparations including black cohosh (5.4% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.003), ginseng (12.5% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.001) and red clover (4.7% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001). Use of black cohosh had a significant breast cancer protective effect (adjusted odds ratio 0.39, 95% CI: 0.22–0.70). This association was similar among women who reported use of either black cohosh or Remifemin (an herbal preparation derived from black cohosh; adjusted odds ratio 0.47, 95% CI: 0.27–0.82). The literature reports that black cohosh may be effective in treating menopausal symptoms, and has antiestrogenic, antiproliferative and antioxidant properties. Additional confirmatory studies are required to determine whether black cohosh could be used to prevent breast cancer.

Background: Unopposed estrogen replacement therapy is associated with increased risk of endometrial cancer. To investigate the mechanism of this association, we evaluated whether risk of endometrial cancer was associated with the genotypes involved in steroid hormone metabolism and the duration of exogenous hormone use. Methods: A population-based case–control study in nine counties of the Philadelphia metropolitan area was undertaken with 502 case patients with endometrial cancer and 1326 age- and race-matched control subjects. Data regarding exogenous hormone use were obtained by interview, and genotypes of the genes COMT, CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, CYP3A4, PGR, SULT1A1, SULT1E1, and UGT1A1 were obtained by polymerase chain reaction techniques. Conditional logistic regression was used to examine the relationship among genotype, hormone use, and endometrial cancer risk. Results: Associations were observed between the risk of endometrial cancer and genotypes of the following steroid hormone metabolism genes: CYP1A1*2C (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08 to 2.61); SULT1A1*3 (adjusted OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.29 to 0.92); and the G → A variant in the promoter of SULT1E1 at position −64 (adjusted OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.99). We observed a statistically significant interaction between estrogen replacement therapy use and SULT1A1*2 genotype: the SULT1A1*2 allele and long-term use of estrogen replacement therapy were associated with statistically significantly higher risk of endometrial cancer (adjusted OR = 3.85, 95% CI = 1.48 to 10.00) than that of the SULT1A1*2 allele and no estrogen replacement therapy use. Conclusions: Among women with long-term use of estrogen replacement therapy or combined hormone replacement therapy, the risk of endometrial cancer may be associated with functionally relevant genotypes that regulate steroid hormone sulfation.

Epidemiologic studies attempt to understand the distribution and determinants of human disease. Epidemiologic research often incorporates information about race, ethnicity, or ancestry, usually as a self-identified race or ethnicity (SIRE) variable. Differences in the distribution and determinants of disease on the basis of SIRE may be identified in these studies. In addition, genetic and other biologic differences according to SIRE are frequently reported. If these differences are real and meaningful, they may have value in identifying disease-causative or -preventive factors, and thus may be beneficial to human health. However, the concepts of race, ethnicity, or ancestry are often poorly considered or crudely applied, particularly in genetic studies of disease etiology or outcome. Consequently, results suggesting genetic differences with respect to disease etiology or outcome across SIRE groups may not be meaningful; in fact, these differences may prove harmful if they propagate stereotypes or spurious differences. Therefore, it is critical to properly consider the meaning, definitions, and use of race, ethnicity, or ancestry in molecular epidemiologic studies.

Purpose: Bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy (BPO) is widely used for cancer risk reduction in women with BRCA1/2 mutations. Many premenopausal women choose to take hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after undergoing BPO to abrogate immediate symptoms of surgically-induced menopause. Thus, we evaluated whether the breast cancer risk reduction conferred by BPO in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is altered by use of post-BPO HRT. Methods: We identified a prospective cohort of 462 women with disease-associated germline BRCA1/2 mutations at 13 medical centers to evaluate breast cancer risk after BPO with and without HRT. We determined the incidence of breast cancer in 155 women who had undergone BPO and in 307 women who had not undergone BPO on whom we had complete information on HRT use. Postoperative follow-up was 3.6 years. Results: Consistent with previous reports, BPO was significantly associated with breast cancer risk reduction overall (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.40; 95%CI, 0.18 to 0.92). Using mutation carriers without BPO or HRT as the referent group, HRT of any type after BPO did not significantly alter the reduction in breast cancer risk associated with BPO (HR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.96). Conclusion: Short-term HRT use does not negate the protective effect of BPO on subsequent breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.