Dimitrios G. Oreopoulos

We report a patient with multifocal fibrosclerosis presenting as sialadenitis, hepatic fibrosis, and retroperitoneal fibrosis with renal failure. His medical management consisted of prednisone (4 months at 40 mg daily, then tapered down to 5 mg daily for another 14 months) and 18 months of tamoxifen. He responded clinically and radiographically to this regimen, and remains in clinical remission 10 months after discontinuing medical therapy. Subsequent histologic examination of submandibular gland tissue revealed strong staining for IgG4-positive plasma cells. To our knowledge, this is the first case of confirmed multifocal hyper-IgG4 disease to be successfully treated with sequential corticosteroids and tamoxifen.

Traditionally, the initial choice of dialysis for patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) has been in-center hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). Usually, the choice between these (PD vs. HD) has been based on the characteristics of the dialysis techniques. Obviously the choice of peritoneal dialysis implied dialysis at home, but its geographic location has been only a secondary consideration. Peritoneal dialysis has evolved as a dependable mode that gives good outcomes. This method has become more attractive with the option of overnight cyclers and the recent use of home helpers in some jurisdictions. At the same time the interest in home hemodialysis was rekindled by reports of good outcomes with short daily or nocturnal hemodialysis. Home dialysis (PD or HD) offers high quality of treatment, a high degree of patient independence, and is financially attractive. Therefore, we propose a change in our approach to the choice of the initial form of dialysis for patients with ESRD. Instead of choosing between HD and PD we should present the new patients the advantage of dialysis at home and instead of asking them to choose between peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis, they should be offered the option to choose between dialysis at home (PD or HD) or in-hospital. This paper will review the advantages of the home-based dialysis methods and the arguments for this simple but vital change in the process of choosing the method of dialysis.

In the last two decades, most developed countries have seen a continuous growth in the number of elderly patients with end-stage renal disease commencing renal replacement therapy. Despite the many advantages that peritoneal dialysis (PD) offers to elderly patients with ESRD, it is still underutilized in older patients. Older patients are much more vulnerable to the problems associated with aging, which may affect their level of independence and their long-term prognosis. Those patients have physiological changes related to aging and common health problems such as anxiety, depression, dementia, visual impairment, and cognitive impairment, all of which interfere with self-performing PD. Assistance with home-care nurses and assistance by a family member may overcome this problem. Some old but also more recent literature data justifies the idea that assisted PD may significantly contribute to increase the overall number of elderly patients who can be treated with PD at home. With assisted PD, free choice can be offered to patients with high comorbidity index who cannot perform their peritoneal exchanges by themselves. Automated peritoneal dialysis is the ideal treatment modality for elderly patients with end-stage renal disease who require assistance since this limits home-care nurse visits to only two a day. As expected, the elderly have a higher mortality rate than younger patients treated by assisted PD, but technique failure rate, overall peritonitis rate, and most quality-of-life (QoL) measures are comparable with those of younger patients. Peritoneal dialysis in nursing homes offers treatment for elderly patients without family support. In this regard, automated PD or nightly PD keeps the patient’s daytime free for nursing home activities, increases socialization, and enables better rehabilitation that improves their QoL. Although withdrawal from dialysis is more frequent among nursing-home dialysis patients, this high discontinuation rate is not due to dialysis per se but rather to associated social and medical circumstances. Better communication between nursing staff and renal team is crucial for improving staff confidence and will contribute to higher utilization of PD in nursing homes.

End stage renal disease is a serious complication in heart or heart–lung transplant recipients and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The majority of these patients are currently treated with hemodialysis. Since there are no randomized control trials comparing hemodialysis to peritoneal dialysis in this patient population, the potential beneficial effects of peritoneal dialysis remain largely unknown. We compared the clinical outcome of such patients on peritoneal dialysis with another group on hemodialysis. Our results indicate that patients on peritoneal dialysis had fewer episodes of congestive heart failure, fluid overload and a lower overall hospitalization rate, despite having worse cardiac function than patients on hemodialysis.

Diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at high risk for developing foot complications and few have studied this complication in the diabetic patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD). The purpose of this study was to examine peripheral vascular disease (PVD) in diabetic patients with ESRD, who are being treated with PD, and to identify those factors that may contribute to its development. We reviewed retrospectively the charts of 71 diabetic patients who started PD between January 1999 and January 2006, inclusive, and recorded their demographic data, their treatment regimens, their complications and the results of biochemical investigation(s) at the beginning and throughout their follow-up period. All patients were under the care of a chiropodist who examined them at regular intervals and more often when needed. We divided the patients into two groups with respect to the presence of complications in the lower extremities, such as ulcers, open wounds, osteomyelitis, necrotizing or gangrenous lesions, and amputations, intermittent claudication and/or the presence on an imaging examination of changes in the leg vessels consistent with vascular disease. 33 of the 71 patients had some type of a foot lesion. There were 8 amputations in the course of 176 patient-years (2 double amputations), or 1 amputation per 30 PD patient-years. Those patients with foot complications were treated more frequently with CCPD (p<0.05), more often had peripheral neuropathy (p<0.002), as well as coronary artery disease (p<0.044). They had lower serum albumin (p<0.005), significantly higher serum phosphorus (p<0.047) and they received higher doses of erythropoietin (p<0.042). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding sex, age at initiation of PD, type of diabetes, use of insulin, levels of HbA(1c), body mass index (BMI), presence of retinopathy, cerebral vascular disease, hyperlipidemia, smoking, rate of transplantation, rate of drop-out from PD, time-averaged Kt/V, creatinine clearance, serum calcium, Ca x P and intact PTH. In a multiple logistics regression model, only peripheral neuropathy and hypoalbuminemia were independently associated with the development of lower-extremity complications (p<0.0066 and p <0.026, respectively). One-, two- and three-year cumulative survival of the whole group was 91.5%, 78.8% and 69%, respectively. Patients with foot lesions had a lower survival than those without. Interestingly though, those patients, who had had an amputation, survived as long as those patients, who did not have foot complications at all. In conclusion, compared to reports in the literature, our diabetic patients on PD had a lower rate of foot complications and amputation probably because of early intervention by our chiropodist. This fact stresses the need for constant and expert monitoring of the condition of the diabetic patient's feet, especially in those with low serum albumin and peripheral neuropathy.