Nusret Ertaş
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Nusret Ertaş has a total of 30 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Usama Alshana
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Sultan Qaboos University, 123 Al Khod, Muscat, Oman
7 shared publications - Ugur Tamer
Gazi University
4 shared publications Nilgün G. Göğer
Department of Analytical Chemistry; Faculty of Pharmacy; Gazi University; Ankara; Turkey
3 shared publicationsOrkun Alp
Gazi Univ, Fac Pharm, Div Analyt Chem, TR-06330 Ankara, Turkey
3 shared publications- Demet Cetin
Division of Science Education, Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Gazi University, Ankara 06500, Türkiye
2 shared publications - Ender Yildirim
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Cankaya, Ankara, 06800, Türkiye
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 29 October 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Food Analytical Methods
- Vol. 18 (1) , 101-112
Characterization and Determination of Selenium Nanoparticles in Dietary Supplements by Single Particle Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry
- 29 October 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Food Analytical Methods
- Vol. 18 (1) , 101-112
Characterization and Determination of Selenium Nanoparticles in Dietary Supplements by Single Particle Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry
- 7 June 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Food Chemistry
- Vol. 426, 136528
Smartphone digital image colorimetry combined with dispersive solid-phase microextraction for the determination of boron in food samples
- 7 June 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Food Chemistry
- Vol. 426, 136528
Smartphone digital image colorimetry combined with dispersive solid-phase microextraction for the determination of boron in food samples
- 24 June 2020
- Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) in Analytical Methods
- Vol. 12 (30) , 3788-3796
Multiplex enumeration ofEscherichia coliandSalmonella enteritidisin a passive capillary microfluidic chip
Multiplex detection and quantification of bacteria in water by using portable devices are particularly essential in low and middle-income countries where access to clean drinking water is limited. Addressing this crucial problem, we report a highly sensitive immunoassay sensor system utilizing the fluorescence technique with magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) to separate target bacteria and two different types of quantum dots (CdTe and Ni doped CdTe QDs) incorporated into a passive microfluidic chip to transport and to form sandwich complexes for the detection of two target bacteria, namely Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Salmonella enteritidis (S. enteritidis) in less than 60 min. The assay is carried out on a capillary driven microfluidic chip that can be operated by merely pipetting the samples and reagents, and fluorescence measurements are done by using a handheld fluorescence spectrophotometer, which renders the system portable. The linear range of the method was found to be 101 to 105 cfu mL−1 for both E. coli and S. enteritidis. The limit of detection (LOD) was calculated to be 5 and 3 cfu mL−1 for E. coli and S. enteritidis, respectively. The selectivity of the method was examined by testing Enterobacter dissolvens (E. dissolvens) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) samples, and no significant interference was observed. The method was also demonstrated to detect bacteria in tap water and lake water samples spiked with target bacteria.
- 24 June 2020
- Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) in Analytical Methods
- Vol. 12 (30) , 3788-3796
Multiplex enumeration ofEscherichia coliandSalmonella enteritidisin a passive capillary microfluidic chip
Multiplex detection and quantification of bacteria in water by using portable devices are particularly essential in low and middle-income countries where access to clean drinking water is limited. Addressing this crucial problem, we report a highly sensitive immunoassay sensor system utilizing the fluorescence technique with magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) to separate target bacteria and two different types of quantum dots (CdTe and Ni doped CdTe QDs) incorporated into a passive microfluidic chip to transport and to form sandwich complexes for the detection of two target bacteria, namely Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Salmonella enteritidis (S. enteritidis) in less than 60 min. The assay is carried out on a capillary driven microfluidic chip that can be operated by merely pipetting the samples and reagents, and fluorescence measurements are done by using a handheld fluorescence spectrophotometer, which renders the system portable. The linear range of the method was found to be 101 to 105 cfu mL−1 for both E. coli and S. enteritidis. The limit of detection (LOD) was calculated to be 5 and 3 cfu mL−1 for E. coli and S. enteritidis, respectively. The selectivity of the method was examined by testing Enterobacter dissolvens (E. dissolvens) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) samples, and no significant interference was observed. The method was also demonstrated to detect bacteria in tap water and lake water samples spiked with target bacteria.
- 1 September 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Microbiological Methods
- Vol. 164, 105680
Fast fluorometric enumeration of E. coli using passive chip
- 1 September 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Microbiological Methods
- Vol. 164, 105680
Fast fluorometric enumeration of E. coli using passive chip
- Open Access
- 6 December 2017
- Published by IntechOpen
Quantum Dots for Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
Quantum dots (QDs) are luminescent semiconductor nanocrystals that have extraordinary luminescence emission properties. Their semiconductor properties are different from bulk material because of the quantum confinement effects. These properties allow the use of QDs as a luminescent probe for pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. Herein, we want to mention the synthesis, surface modification, characterization, and application of QDs. The aim of this chapter is to compile and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of QDs and their usage areas.
- 6 December 2017
- Published by IntechOpen
Open AccessQuantum Dots for Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
Quantum dots (QDs) are luminescent semiconductor nanocrystals that have extraordinary luminescence emission properties. Their semiconductor properties are different from bulk material because of the quantum confinement effects. These properties allow the use of QDs as a luminescent probe for pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. Herein, we want to mention the synthesis, surface modification, characterization, and application of QDs. The aim of this chapter is to compile and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of QDs and their usage areas.
- 13 March 2013
- Published by Wiley in Electrophoresis
- Vol. 34 (6) , 854-861
Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop combined with field-amplified sample injection in capillary electrophoresis for the determination of beta(2)-agonists in bovine urine
Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop (DLLME–SFO) was for the first time combined with field‐amplified sample injection (FASI) in CE to determine four β2‐agonists (cimbuterol, clenbuterol, mabuterol, and mapenterol) in bovine urine. Optimum BGE consisted of 20 mM borate buffer and 0.1 mM SDS. Using salting‐out extraction, β2‐agonists were extracted into ACN that was then used as the disperser solvent in DLLME–SFO. Optimum DLLME–SFO conditions were: 1.0 mL ACN, 50 μL 1‐undecanol (extraction solvent), total extraction time 1.5 min, no salt addition. Back extraction into an aqueous solution (pH 2.0) facilitated direct injection of β2‐agonists into CE. Compared to conventional CZE, DLLME–SFO–FASI–CE achieved sensitivity enhancement factors of 41–1046 resulting in LODs in the range of 1.80–37.0 μg L−1. Linear dynamic ranges of 0.15–10.0 mg L−1 for cimbuterol and 15–1000 μg L−1 for the other analytes were obtained with coefficients of determination (R2) ≥ 0.9901 and RSD% ≤5.5 (n = 5). Finally, the applicability of the proposed method was successfully confirmed by determination of the four β2‐agonists in spiked bovine urine samples and accuracy higher than 96.0% was obtained.
- 13 March 2013
- Published by Wiley in Electrophoresis
- Vol. 34 (6) , 854-861
Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop combined with field-amplified sample injection in capillary electrophoresis for the determination of beta(2)-agonists in bovine urine
Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop (DLLME–SFO) was for the first time combined with field‐amplified sample injection (FASI) in CE to determine four β2‐agonists (cimbuterol, clenbuterol, mabuterol, and mapenterol) in bovine urine. Optimum BGE consisted of 20 mM borate buffer and 0.1 mM SDS. Using salting‐out extraction, β2‐agonists were extracted into ACN that was then used as the disperser solvent in DLLME–SFO. Optimum DLLME–SFO conditions were: 1.0 mL ACN, 50 μL 1‐undecanol (extraction solvent), total extraction time 1.5 min, no salt addition. Back extraction into an aqueous solution (pH 2.0) facilitated direct injection of β2‐agonists into CE. Compared to conventional CZE, DLLME–SFO–FASI–CE achieved sensitivity enhancement factors of 41–1046 resulting in LODs in the range of 1.80–37.0 μg L−1. Linear dynamic ranges of 0.15–10.0 mg L−1 for cimbuterol and 15–1000 μg L−1 for the other analytes were obtained with coefficients of determination (R2) ≥ 0.9901 and RSD% ≤5.5 (n = 5). Finally, the applicability of the proposed method was successfully confirmed by determination of the four β2‐agonists in spiked bovine urine samples and accuracy higher than 96.0% was obtained.
- 8 January 2013
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies
- Vol. 36 (20) , 2855-2870
DISPERSIVE LIQUID-LIQUID MICROEXTRACTION BASED ON SOLIDIFICATION OF FLOATING ORGANIC DROP COMBINED WITH COUNTER-ELECTROOSMOTIC FLOW NORMAL STACKING MODE IN CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF BISPHENOL A IN WATER AND URINE SAMPLES
Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method based on solidification of floating organic drop (DLLME-SFO) was combined for the first time with counter-electroosmotic flow normal stacking mode (counter-EOF NSM) in capillary electrophoresis (CE) for preconcentration and determination of bisphenol A (BPA) in water and urine samples. Several parameters affecting extraction efficiency, including type and volume of the extraction and disperser solvents, pH, volume of sample and back-extraction solutions, and ionic strength, were systematically studied. In-vial back-extraction of the target analyte from the resulting organic drop into an aqueous phase facilitated the direct application of DLLME-SFO with CE. Under optimum conditions, improvement factors of 1250 (water) and 430 (urine) as compared to conventional capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) were obtained. Calibration graphs were linear up to 100 µg L−1 with coefficients of determination (R2) ≥ 0.9989 and relative standard deviation (RSD %) ≤ 1.9. Limits of detection (LOD) of 0.8 µg L−1 (water) and 2.5 µg L−1 (urine) were achieved. Because this method required simple and inexpensive devices and very small volumes of nontoxic organic solvents, it is an affordable, efficient, and convenient method for extraction and determination of trace amounts of BPA in water and human urine samples.
- 8 January 2013
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies
- Vol. 36 (20) , 2855-2870
DISPERSIVE LIQUID-LIQUID MICROEXTRACTION BASED ON SOLIDIFICATION OF FLOATING ORGANIC DROP COMBINED WITH COUNTER-ELECTROOSMOTIC FLOW NORMAL STACKING MODE IN CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF BISPHENOL A IN WATER AND URINE SAMPLES
Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method based on solidification of floating organic drop (DLLME-SFO) was combined for the first time with counter-electroosmotic flow normal stacking mode (counter-EOF NSM) in capillary electrophoresis (CE) for preconcentration and determination of bisphenol A (BPA) in water and urine samples. Several parameters affecting extraction efficiency, including type and volume of the extraction and disperser solvents, pH, volume of sample and back-extraction solutions, and ionic strength, were systematically studied. In-vial back-extraction of the target analyte from the resulting organic drop into an aqueous phase facilitated the direct application of DLLME-SFO with CE. Under optimum conditions, improvement factors of 1250 (water) and 430 (urine) as compared to conventional capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) were obtained. Calibration graphs were linear up to 100 µg L−1 with coefficients of determination (R2) ≥ 0.9989 and relative standard deviation (RSD %) ≤ 1.9. Limits of detection (LOD) of 0.8 µg L−1 (water) and 2.5 µg L−1 (urine) were achieved. Because this method required simple and inexpensive devices and very small volumes of nontoxic organic solvents, it is an affordable, efficient, and convenient method for extraction and determination of trace amounts of BPA in water and human urine samples.
- 25 June 2012
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Separation Science
- Vol. 35 (16) , 2114-2121
Ultrasound‐assisted emulsification microextraction for the determination of ephedrines in human urine by capillary electrophoresis with direct injection. Comparison with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction
Ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction and dispersive liquidliquid microextraction were compared for extraction of ephedrine, norephedrine, and pseudoephedrine from human urine samples prior to their determination by capillary electrophoresis. Formation of a microemulsion of the organic extract with an aqueous solution (at pH 3.2) containing 10% methanol facilitated the direct injection of the final extract into the capillary. Influential parameters affecting extraction efficiency were systematically studied and optimized. In order to enhance the sensitivity further, field-amplified sample injection was applied. Under optimum extraction and stacking conditions, enrichment factors of up to 140 and 1750 as compared to conventional capillary zone electrophoresis were obtained resulting in limits of detection of 1233 mu g/L and 1.02.8 mu g/L with dispersive liquidliquid microextraction and ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction when combined with field-amplified sample injection. Calibration graphs showed good linearity for urine samples by both methods with coefficients of determination higher than 0.9973 and percent relative standard deviations of the analyses in the range of 3.48.2% for (n = 5). The results showed that the use of ultrasound to assist microextraction provided higher extraction efficiencies than disperser solvents, regarding the hydrophilic nature of the investigated analytes.
- 25 June 2012
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Separation Science
- Vol. 35 (16) , 2114-2121
Ultrasound‐assisted emulsification microextraction for the determination of ephedrines in human urine by capillary electrophoresis with direct injection. Comparison with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction
Ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction and dispersive liquidliquid microextraction were compared for extraction of ephedrine, norephedrine, and pseudoephedrine from human urine samples prior to their determination by capillary electrophoresis. Formation of a microemulsion of the organic extract with an aqueous solution (at pH 3.2) containing 10% methanol facilitated the direct injection of the final extract into the capillary. Influential parameters affecting extraction efficiency were systematically studied and optimized. In order to enhance the sensitivity further, field-amplified sample injection was applied. Under optimum extraction and stacking conditions, enrichment factors of up to 140 and 1750 as compared to conventional capillary zone electrophoresis were obtained resulting in limits of detection of 1233 mu g/L and 1.02.8 mu g/L with dispersive liquidliquid microextraction and ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction when combined with field-amplified sample injection. Calibration graphs showed good linearity for urine samples by both methods with coefficients of determination higher than 0.9973 and percent relative standard deviations of the analyses in the range of 3.48.2% for (n = 5). The results showed that the use of ultrasound to assist microextraction provided higher extraction efficiencies than disperser solvents, regarding the hydrophilic nature of the investigated analytes.