Angela D. Friederici
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Angela D. Friederici has a total of 31 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Anja Hahne
Ear Research Center Dresden (ERCD), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
4 shared publications Karsten Steinhauer
†Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, PO Box 500 355, 04303 Leipzig, Germany; ¶Georgetown University, Department of Neuroscience, Brain and Language Lab, 3900 Reservoir Road, NW, Washington, DC 20007; and ‖Science and Computing, Hagellocher Weg 71, 72070 Tuebingen, Germany
4 shared publicationsAxel Mecklinger
3 shared publications- Martin Meyer
Institute for the Interdisciplinary Study of Language Evolution, University of Zurich
3 shared publications - Burkhard Maess
Methods and Development Group Brain Networks, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
2 shared publications D. Yves von Cramon
Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, D-04303 Leipzig, Germany
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 1 January 2005
- Published by MIT Press in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Vol. 17 (1) , 154-167
Influence of Prosodic Information on the Processing of Split Particles: ERP Evidence from Spoken German
Spoken language comprehension involves the use of different sources of linguistic information such as prosodic, syntactic, lexical, and semantic information. The question, however, of “when” and “how” these sources of information are exploited by the language processing system still remains unanswered. In the present study, we used event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to investigate the interaction between prosodic, syntactic, and lexical information during the processing of spoken German sentences. The sentence structure was manipulated by positioning a split particle at the end of the sentences after the occurrence of inflected verb whose lexical entry does not contain a split particle (e.g., *Sie alarmierte den Detektiv an [*She alerted at the detective]) [According to linguistic convention, incorrect sentences are marked by an asterisk.]. The prosodic contour of the verb stems was manipulated such that it marked either the presence of a split particle at a later position in the sentence or not. Participants performed an off-line probe-detection task. ERP data indicate that prosodic information of German-inflected verb stems is consulted on-line by the language processing system (“parser”) in order to “predict” the presence of a split particle at a later position in the sentence. An N400 effect was observed for the processing of split particles following verb stems which do not take a particle. However, this effect was only observed when the prosody of the verb stem did signal the presence of a split particle. We argue that the N400 component reflects the high costs associated with the lexical search that the language processing system has to perform when confronted with nonexisting words such as these resulting from the combination of the split particle and the verb stem in the present study. Furthermore, as a general reflection of prosodic processes, a Closure Positive Shift (CPS) was found at intonational phrase boundaries. In sum, the present findings provide strong evidence that prosodic information is a good “predictor” of upcoming information during the auditory processing of German sentences.
- 1 January 2005
- Published by MIT Press in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Vol. 17 (1) , 154-167
Influence of Prosodic Information on the Processing of Split Particles: ERP Evidence from Spoken German
Spoken language comprehension involves the use of different sources of linguistic information such as prosodic, syntactic, lexical, and semantic information. The question, however, of “when” and “how” these sources of information are exploited by the language processing system still remains unanswered. In the present study, we used event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to investigate the interaction between prosodic, syntactic, and lexical information during the processing of spoken German sentences. The sentence structure was manipulated by positioning a split particle at the end of the sentences after the occurrence of inflected verb whose lexical entry does not contain a split particle (e.g., *Sie alarmierte den Detektiv an [*She alerted at the detective]) [According to linguistic convention, incorrect sentences are marked by an asterisk.]. The prosodic contour of the verb stems was manipulated such that it marked either the presence of a split particle at a later position in the sentence or not. Participants performed an off-line probe-detection task. ERP data indicate that prosodic information of German-inflected verb stems is consulted on-line by the language processing system (“parser”) in order to “predict” the presence of a split particle at a later position in the sentence. An N400 effect was observed for the processing of split particles following verb stems which do not take a particle. However, this effect was only observed when the prosody of the verb stem did signal the presence of a split particle. We argue that the N400 component reflects the high costs associated with the lexical search that the language processing system has to perform when confronted with nonexisting words such as these resulting from the combination of the split particle and the verb stem in the present study. Furthermore, as a general reflection of prosodic processes, a Closure Positive Shift (CPS) was found at intonational phrase boundaries. In sum, the present findings provide strong evidence that prosodic information is a good “predictor” of upcoming information during the auditory processing of German sentences.
- Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2004
- Published by Elsevier in Brain and Language
- Vol. 89 (2) , 267-276
Lateralization of auditory language functions: A dynamic dual pathway model
- 1 May 2004
- Published by Elsevier in Brain and Language
- Vol. 89 (2) , 267-276
Top Cited PapersLateralization of auditory language functions: A dynamic dual pathway model
- 1 March 2004
- Published by Elsevier in Brain Research
- Vol. 1000 (1-2) , 72-77
The brain knows the difference: two types of grammatical violations
- 1 March 2004
- Published by Elsevier in Brain Research
- Vol. 1000 (1-2) , 72-77
The brain knows the difference: two types of grammatical violations
- 1 January 2004
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in NeuroReport
- Vol. 15 (1) , 165-169
The relative timing of syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension
The functional primacy of syntactic over semantic processes was put to test in an auditory event-related brain potentials study using sentences in which the final words were semantically and/or syntactically incongruent with the prior context. Crucially, these words encoded the syntactically relevant word category information in the suffix, available only after the word stem which carried the semantic information. Semantic violations elicited an N400 and syntactic violations a biphasic LAN-P600 pattern. Words that were semantically and syntactically incongruent with the context evoked a biphasic LAN-P600 ERP pattern, but no N400. The similarity of the ERP pattern for the pure syntactic and the double violation condition provides strong evidence for a functional primacy of initial syntactic over lexical-semantic processes.
- 1 January 2004
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in NeuroReport
- Vol. 15 (1) , 165-169
The relative timing of syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension
The functional primacy of syntactic over semantic processes was put to test in an auditory event-related brain potentials study using sentences in which the final words were semantically and/or syntactically incongruent with the prior context. Crucially, these words encoded the syntactically relevant word category information in the suffix, available only after the word stem which carried the semantic information. Semantic violations elicited an N400 and syntactic violations a biphasic LAN-P600 pattern. Words that were semantically and syntactically incongruent with the context evoked a biphasic LAN-P600 ERP pattern, but no N400. The similarity of the ERP pattern for the pure syntactic and the double violation condition provides strong evidence for a functional primacy of initial syntactic over lexical-semantic processes.
- 1 November 2003
- Published by Elsevier in NeuroImage
- Vol. 20, S8-S17
The brain basis of syntactic processes: functional imaging and lesion studies
- 1 November 2003
- Published by Elsevier in NeuroImage
- Vol. 20, S8-S17
The brain basis of syntactic processes: functional imaging and lesion studies
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 1 February 2003
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Cerebral Cortex
- Vol. 13 (2) , 170-177
The Role of Left Inferior Frontal and Superior Temporal Cortex in Sentence Comprehension: Localizing Syntactic and Semantic Processes
An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigm was used to specify those brain areas supporting the processing of sentence-level semantic and syntactic information. Hemodynamic responses were recorded while participants listened to correct, semantically incorrect and syntactically incorrect sentences. Both anomalous conditions recruited larger portions of the superior temporal region than correct sentences. Processing of semantic violations relied primarily on the mid-portion of the superior temporal region bilaterally and the insular cortex bilaterally, whereas processing of syntactic violations specifically involved the anterior portion of the left superior temporal gyrus, the left posterior frontal operculum adjacent to Broca’s area and the putamen in the left basal ganglia. A comparison of the two anomalous conditions revealed higher levels of activation for the syntactic over the semantic condition in the left basal ganglia and for the semantic over the syntactic condition in the mid-portion of the superior temporal gyrus, bilaterally. These data indicate that both semantic and syntactic processes are supported by a temporo-frontal network with distinct areas specialized for semantic and syntactic processes.
- 1 February 2003
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Cerebral Cortex
- Vol. 13 (2) , 170-177
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessThe Role of Left Inferior Frontal and Superior Temporal Cortex in Sentence Comprehension: Localizing Syntactic and Semantic Processes
An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigm was used to specify those brain areas supporting the processing of sentence-level semantic and syntactic information. Hemodynamic responses were recorded while participants listened to correct, semantically incorrect and syntactically incorrect sentences. Both anomalous conditions recruited larger portions of the superior temporal region than correct sentences. Processing of semantic violations relied primarily on the mid-portion of the superior temporal region bilaterally and the insular cortex bilaterally, whereas processing of syntactic violations specifically involved the anterior portion of the left superior temporal gyrus, the left posterior frontal operculum adjacent to Broca’s area and the putamen in the left basal ganglia. A comparison of the two anomalous conditions revealed higher levels of activation for the syntactic over the semantic condition in the left basal ganglia and for the semantic over the syntactic condition in the mid-portion of the superior temporal gyrus, bilaterally. These data indicate that both semantic and syntactic processes are supported by a temporo-frontal network with distinct areas specialized for semantic and syntactic processes.
- 1 January 2003
- Vol. 17 (1) , 133-42
Syntactic comprehension in Parkinson's disease: investigating early automatic and late integrational processes using event-related brain potentials.
Parkinson's disease (PD) has been associated with a general impairment of procedures and with an impairment of syntactic procedures in particular. The present study investigated comprehension processes in PD using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). PD patients and controls listened to sentences that were either correct or syntactically or semantically incorrect. The language-related ERP component correlated with semantic processes (N400) was present in both groups. In the syntactic domain, early automatic processes (early negativity) appeared normal in PD, whereas late integrational processes (P600) were modulated by this disease. The present findings suggest that the basal ganglia primarily do not support early automatic syntactic processes during comprehension but rather support processes of syntactic integration.
- 1 January 2003
- Vol. 17 (1) , 133-42
Syntactic comprehension in Parkinson's disease: investigating early automatic and late integrational processes using event-related brain potentials.
Parkinson's disease (PD) has been associated with a general impairment of procedures and with an impairment of syntactic procedures in particular. The present study investigated comprehension processes in PD using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). PD patients and controls listened to sentences that were either correct or syntactically or semantically incorrect. The language-related ERP component correlated with semantic processes (N400) was present in both groups. In the syntactic domain, early automatic processes (early negativity) appeared normal in PD, whereas late integrational processes (P600) were modulated by this disease. The present findings suggest that the basal ganglia primarily do not support early automatic syntactic processes during comprehension but rather support processes of syntactic integration.
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 1 February 2002
- Published by Elsevier in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Vol. 6 (2) , 78-84
Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing
- 1 February 2002
- Published by Elsevier in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Vol. 6 (2) , 78-84
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessTowards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing
- Open Access
- 2 January 2002
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 99 (1) , 529-534
Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis
Adult second language learning seems to be more difficult and less efficient than first language acquisition during childhood. By using event-related brain potentials, we show that adults who learned a miniature artificial language display a similar real-time pattern of brain activation when processing this language as native speakers do when processing natural languages. Participants trained in the artificial language showed two event-related brain potential components taken to reflect early automatic and late controlled syntactic processes, whereas untrained participants did not. This result challenges the common view that late second language learners process language in a principally different way from native speakers. Our findings demonstrate that a small system of grammatical rules can be syntactically instantiated by the adult speaker in a way that strongly resembles native-speaker sentence processing.
- 2 January 2002
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 99 (1) , 529-534
Open AccessBrain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis
Adult second language learning seems to be more difficult and less efficient than first language acquisition during childhood. By using event-related brain potentials, we show that adults who learned a miniature artificial language display a similar real-time pattern of brain activation when processing this language as native speakers do when processing natural languages. Participants trained in the artificial language showed two event-related brain potential components taken to reflect early automatic and late controlled syntactic processes, whereas untrained participants did not. This result challenges the common view that late second language learners process language in a principally different way from native speakers. Our findings demonstrate that a small system of grammatical rules can be syntactically instantiated by the adult speaker in a way that strongly resembles native-speaker sentence processing.
- 1 January 2002
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
- Vol. 31 (1) , 45-63
Distinct Neurophysiological Patterns Reflecting Aspects of Syntactic Complexity and Syntactic Repair
Aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair were investigated by comparing the event-related (brain) potentials (ERPs) for sentences of different syntactic complexity to those containing a...
- 1 January 2002
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
- Vol. 31 (1) , 45-63
Distinct Neurophysiological Patterns Reflecting Aspects of Syntactic Complexity and Syntactic Repair
Aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair were investigated by comparing the event-related (brain) potentials (ERPs) for sentences of different syntactic complexity to those containing a...