Nadine Aubry
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Nadine Aubry has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Demetrios T. Papageorgiou
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, UK
1 shared publication John Kadaksham
Department of Mechanical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102, USA
1 shared publication- O. Ozen
Department of Mathematical Sciences and Center for Applied Mathematics and Statistics, New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ 07102, USA
1 shared publication - Peter G. Petropoulos
Dept. of Math. Sci., New Jersey Inst. of Technol., Newark, NJ, USA
1 shared publication - Pushpendra Singh
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 12 April 2006
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review Letters
- Vol. 96 (14) , 144501
Monodisperse Drop Formation in Square Microchannels
The electrohydrodynamic instability of the interface between two liquids with different physical and electrical properties in plane Poiseuille flow is used to form monodisperse droplets in a square channel. The drop size and formation rate are controlled by simply controlling the flow rates and the amplitude of the electric field applied across the channel.
- 12 April 2006
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review Letters
- Vol. 96 (14) , 144501
Monodisperse Drop Formation in Square Microchannels
The electrohydrodynamic instability of the interface between two liquids with different physical and electrical properties in plane Poiseuille flow is used to form monodisperse droplets in a square channel. The drop size and formation rate are controlled by simply controlling the flow rates and the amplitude of the electric field applied across the channel.
- 30 September 2005
- Published by Wiley in Electrophoresis
- Vol. 26 (19) , 3738-3744
Dielectrophoresis induced clustering regimes of viable yeast cells
We experimentally study the transient clustering behavior of viable yeast cells in a dilute suspension suddenly subjected to a nonuniform alternating current (AC) electric field of a microelectrode device. The frequency of the applied electric field is varied to identify two distinct regimes of positive dielectrophoresis. In both regimes, the yeast cells eventually cluster at electrodes' edges, but their transient behavior as well as their final arrangement is quite different. Specifically, when the frequency is much smaller than the cross-over frequency, the nearby yeast cells quickly rearrange in well-defined chains which then move toward the electrodes' edges and remain aligned as elongated chains at their final location. However, when the frequency is close to the cross-over frequency, cells move individually toward the regions of collection and simply agglomerate along the electrodes' edges. Our analysis shows that in the first regime both the dielectrophoretic (DEP) force and the mutual DEP force, which arises due to the electrostatic particle–particle interactions, are important. In the second regime, on the other hand, the DEP force dominates.
- 30 September 2005
- Published by Wiley in Electrophoresis
- Vol. 26 (19) , 3738-3744
Dielectrophoresis induced clustering regimes of viable yeast cells
We experimentally study the transient clustering behavior of viable yeast cells in a dilute suspension suddenly subjected to a nonuniform alternating current (AC) electric field of a microelectrode device. The frequency of the applied electric field is varied to identify two distinct regimes of positive dielectrophoresis. In both regimes, the yeast cells eventually cluster at electrodes' edges, but their transient behavior as well as their final arrangement is quite different. Specifically, when the frequency is much smaller than the cross-over frequency, the nearby yeast cells quickly rearrange in well-defined chains which then move toward the electrodes' edges and remain aligned as elongated chains at their final location. However, when the frequency is close to the cross-over frequency, cells move individually toward the regions of collection and simply agglomerate along the electrodes' edges. Our analysis shows that in the first regime both the dielectrophoretic (DEP) force and the mutual DEP force, which arises due to the electrostatic particle–particle interactions, are important. In the second regime, on the other hand, the DEP force dominates.