Benjamin K. Yee

A reduction in α5 subunit‐containing γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA)_A receptors has been reported to enhance some forms of learning in mutant mouse models. This effect has been attributed to impaired α5 GABA_A receptor‐mediated inhibitory modulation in the hippocampus. The introduction of a point mutation (H105R) in the α5 subunit is associated with a specific reduction of α5 subunit‐containing GABA_A receptors in the hippocampus. The present study examined the modulation of associative learning and the extinction of conditioned response in these animals. The strength of classical conditioning can be weakened when a trace interval is interposed between the conditioned stimulus and unconditioned stimulus. Here we report that this ‘trace effect’ in classical conditioning was absent in the mutant mice − they were insensitive to the imposition of a 20‐s trace interval. This effect of the mutation was most clearly in the female mice using an aversive conditioning paradigm, and in the male mice using an appetitive conditioning paradigm. These gender‐specific phenotypes were accompanied by a resistance to extinction of conditioned fear response in the mutant mice that was apparent in both genders. Our results identify neuronal inhibition in the hippocampus mediated via α5 GABA_A receptors as a critical control element in the regulation of the acquisition and expression of associative memory.

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response refers to the reduction in startle reaction to a startle-eliciting stimulus when it is shortly preceded by a subthreshold prepulse stimulus. Here, we evaluated the possible effects on prepulse-elicited reactivity by dizocilpine (MK-801) and phencyclidine (PCP) in the PPI of acoustic startle paradigm in C57BL6/J mice. The aim was to ascertain whether these two drugs would affect prepulse-elicited reactivity in a manner similar to apomorphine, which enhances prepulse-elicited reactivity at doses that disrupt PPI. In two dose–response studies, we showed that both drugs exhibited a tendency to attenuate prepulse-elicited reaction at higher doses when PPI was severely disrupted. On the other hand, at lower doses when PPI was marginally disrupted, reaction to the prepulse, if anything, tended to increase. It is concluded that PPI disruption induced by noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists can be distinguished from apomorphine-induced PPI disruption by their concomitant effects on prepulse-elicited reactivity. Our data support the suggestion that dopamine receptor agonists and NMDA receptor antagonists disrupt PPI via interference with distinct neural pathways or neuronal systems.

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle refers to the phenomenon in which a weak prepulse attenuates the startle response to a succeeding intense stimulus. PPI can be disrupted by systemic apomorphine in animals, and reduced PPI has been consistently reported in schizophrenia patients. The ability of the atypical antipsychotic clozapine to reverse apomorphine-induced PPI deficit has been demonstrated in the rat, but has not yet been tested in the mouse. The present study was designed to fill this gap.

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) refers to the reduction in startle reaction to a startle-eliciting stimulus when it is shortly preceded by a subthreshold prepulse stimulus. PPI has been extensively employed as an assay for sensorimotor gating, and its disruption has been characterized in specific disease conditions, including schizophrenia. In animals, dopamine agonists disrupt PPI, and this disruption can be antagonized by antipsychotic drug treatment. The present study extended these fundamental findings to C57BL6 mice, and further evaluated the subjects' reaction to the prepulse stimulus alone in relation to the expression of PPI. Not only did apomorphine (2.0 mg/kg, intraperitoneal (i.p.)) attenuate PPI but it also enhanced reactivity to the prepulse stimulus. The dual effects of apomorphine appear paradoxical in view of the positive correlation, detectable in both the control and apomorphine groups, between prepulse reactivity and PPI magnitude. The present findings contradict the hypothesis that apomorphine disrupts PPI via reduced detectability or perception of the prepulse, and we further propose that enhanced distractibility may provide a parsimonious account for the dual effects of apomorphine. Moreover, haloperidol pretreatment (0.4 mg/kg, i.p.) fully antagonized the effects of apomorphine upon prepulse reactivity as well as on PPI. The present results add to our understanding of the relevance and applicability of the PPI paradigm in modeling schizophrenia-like symptoms in animals.