MBM. Di Berardino

M. Di Berardino

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

M. Di Berardino has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • M. Hebeisen

    Leister Process Technologies, Axetris Division, Schwarzenbergstrasse 10, CH‐6056 Kaegiswil, Switzerland; telephone: 41‐41‐662‐74‐83; fax: 41‐41‐662‐75‐25

    2 shared publications
  • A. Huwiler

    Leister Process Technologies, Axetris Microsystems Division, Kägiswil, Switzerland

    1 shared publication
  • E. Franco‐Lara

    Institute of Biochemical Engineering, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany

    1 shared publication
  • Florian David

    Chalmers University of Technology

    1 shared publication
  • G. Schade

    Leister Process Technologies, Axetris Division, Schwarzenbergstrasse 10, CH‐6056 Kaegiswil, Switzerland; telephone: 41‐41‐662‐74‐83; fax: 41‐41‐662‐75‐25

    1 shared publication
  • G. Schade‐Kampmann

    Leister Process Technologies, Axetris Microsystems Division, Kägiswil, Switzerland

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Viability and membrane potential analysis of Bacillus megaterium cells by impedance flow cytometry

    by F. David, M. Hebeisen, G. Schade, E. Franco‐Lara, M. Di Berardino

    Single cell analysis is an important tool to gain deeper insights into microbial physiology for the characterization and optimization of bioprocesses. In this study a novel single cell analysis technique was applied for estimating viability and membrane potential (MP) of Bacillus megaterium cells cultured in minimal medium. Its measurement principle is based on the analysis of the electrical cell properties and is called impedance flow cytometry (IFC). Comparatively, state‐of‐the‐art fluorescence‐based flow cytometry (FCM) was used to verify the results obtained by IFC. Viability and MP analyses were performed with cells at different well‐defined growth stages, focusing mainly on exponential and stationary phase cells, as well as on dead cells. This was done by PI and DiOC2(3) staining assays in FCM and by impedance measurements at 0.5 and 10 MHz in IFC. In addition, transition growth stages of long‐term cultures and agar plate colonies were characterized with both methods. FCM and IFC analyses of all experiments gave comparable results, quantitatively and qualitatively, indicating that IFC is an equivalent technique to FCM for the study of physiological cell states of bacteria. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012; 109:483–492.


  • On‐chip non‐invasive and label‐free cell discrimination by impedance spectroscopy

    by G. Schade‐Kampmann, A. Huwiler, M. Hebeisen, T. Hessler, M. Di Berardino

    Objectives: Many flow-cytometric cell characterization methods require costly markers and colour reagents. We present here a novel device for cell discrimination based on impedance measurement of electrical cell properties in a microfluidic chip, without the need of extensive sample preparation steps and the requirement of labelling dyes. Materials and methods, Results: We demonstrate that in-flow single cell measurements in our microchip allow for discrimination of various cell line types, such as undifferentiated mouse fibroblasts 3T3-L1 and adipocytes on the one hand, or human monocytes and in vitro differentiated dendritic cells and macrophages on the other hand. In addition, viability and apoptosis analyses were carried out successfully for Jurkat cell models. Studies on several species, including bacteria or fungi, demonstrate not only the capability to enumerate these cells, but also show that even other microbiological life cycle phases can be visualized. Conclusions: These results underline the potential of impedance spectroscopy flow cytometry as a valuable complement to other known cytometers and cell detection systems.