Brian F. Gage
Research Subjects
Brian F. Gage has a total of 97 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Anne R. Bass
Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
3 shared publicationsCharles S. Eby
Department of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
3 shared publicationsHannah Lin
Department of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
3 shared publications- Paul E. Milligan
Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
3 shared publications Ryan M. Nunley
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
3 shared publicationsAmir K. Jaffer
Department of Medicine, New York Presbyterian Queens Hospital, New York
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 3 September 2019
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 322 (9) , 834-842
Effect of Low-Intensity vs Standard-Intensity Warfarin Prophylaxis on Venous Thromboembolism or Death Among Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty
Based on data from 58 US emergency departments during the years 2013 and 2014, warfarin accounted for more medication-related emergency visits among older patients than any other drug.1 However, direct oral anticoagulants, with their rapid onset of action, also cause hemorrhage requiring emergency care,1 especially after orthopedic surgery.2-4 Thus, warfarin continues to be prescribed after hip and knee arthroplasty, particularly among high-risk orthopedic patients.5
- 3 September 2019
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 322 (9) , 834-842
Open AccessEffect of Low-Intensity vs Standard-Intensity Warfarin Prophylaxis on Venous Thromboembolism or Death Among Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty
Based on data from 58 US emergency departments during the years 2013 and 2014, warfarin accounted for more medication-related emergency visits among older patients than any other drug.1 However, direct oral anticoagulants, with their rapid onset of action, also cause hemorrhage requiring emergency care,1 especially after orthopedic surgery.2-4 Thus, warfarin continues to be prescribed after hip and knee arthroplasty, particularly among high-risk orthopedic patients.5
- 27 March 2018
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 319 (12) , 1279-1280
Genotype vs Clinically Guided Dosing of Warfarin to Prevent Adverse Events—Reply
In Reply Mr Han-You asks about subgroup analyses by type of arthroplasty (hip vs knee), site, and race in the Genetic Informatics Trial (GIFT) of Warfarin to Prevent Deep Venous Thrombosis. Randomization was stratified by medical center, type of arthroplasty (knee or hip), and race (black vs other races). The primary end point, a composite of major bleeding, INR of 4 or greater, venous thromboembolism, or death occurred in 14.7% of participants randomized to clinical warfarin dosing and in 10.8% randomized to genotype-guided dosing (P = .02). We repeated our primary analysis using a generalized linear mixed model with medical center as a random effect and the results were corroborated in that genotype-guided warfarin dosing significantly reduced the primary end point.
- 27 March 2018
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 319 (12) , 1279-1280
Genotype vs Clinically Guided Dosing of Warfarin to Prevent Adverse Events—Reply
In Reply Mr Han-You asks about subgroup analyses by type of arthroplasty (hip vs knee), site, and race in the Genetic Informatics Trial (GIFT) of Warfarin to Prevent Deep Venous Thrombosis. Randomization was stratified by medical center, type of arthroplasty (knee or hip), and race (black vs other races). The primary end point, a composite of major bleeding, INR of 4 or greater, venous thromboembolism, or death occurred in 14.7% of participants randomized to clinical warfarin dosing and in 10.8% randomized to genotype-guided dosing (P = .02). We repeated our primary analysis using a generalized linear mixed model with medical center as a random effect and the results were corroborated in that genotype-guided warfarin dosing significantly reduced the primary end point.
- 12 October 2017
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Pharmacogenomics
- Vol. 18 (15) , 1379-1380
Interview about the GIFT Trial, Pharmacogenetics, and Warfarin
- 12 October 2017
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Pharmacogenomics
- Vol. 18 (15) , 1379-1380
Interview about the GIFT Trial, Pharmacogenetics, and Warfarin
- Open Access
- 3 October 2017
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 318 (12) , 1115-1124
Effect of Genotype-Guided Warfarin Dosing on Clinical Events and Anticoagulation Control Among Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty
Importance Warfarin use accounts for more medication-related emergency department visits among older patients than any other drug. Whether genotype-guided warfarin dosing can prevent these adverse events is unknown. Objective To determine whether genotype-guided dosing improves the safety of warfarin initiation. Design, Setting, and Patients The randomized clinical Genetic Informatics Trial (GIFT) of Warfarin to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis included patients aged 65 years or older initiating warfarin for elective hip or knee arthroplasty and was conducted at 6 US medical centers. Enrollment began in April 2011 and follow-up concluded in October 2016. Interventions Patients were genotyped for the following polymorphisms:VKORC1-1639G>A,CYP2C9*2, CYP2C9*3, andCYP4F2 V433M. In a 2 × 2 factorial design, patients were randomized to genotype-guided (n = 831) or clinically guided (n = 819) warfarin dosing on days 1 through 11 of therapy and to a target international normalized ratio (INR) of either 1.8 or 2.5. The recommended doses of warfarin were open label, but the patients and clinicians were blinded to study group assignment. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the composite of major bleeding, INR of 4 or greater, venous thromboembolism, or death. Patients underwent a screening lower-extremity duplex ultrasound approximately 1 month after arthroplasty. Results Among 1650 randomized patients (mean age, 72.1 years [SD, 5.4 years]; 63.6% women; 91.0% white), 1597 (96.8%) received at least 1 dose of warfarin therapy and completed the trial (n = 808 in genotype-guided group vs n = 789 in clinically guided group). A total of 87 patients (10.8%) in the genotype-guided group vs 116 patients (14.7%) in the clinically guided warfarin dosing group met at least 1 of the end points (absolute difference, 3.9% [95% CI, 0.7%-7.2%],P = .02; relative rate [RR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.56-0.95]). The numbers of individual events in the genotype-guided group vs the clinically guided group were 2 vs 8 for major bleeding (RR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.05-1.15), 56 vs 77 for INR of 4 or greater (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.99), 33 vs 38 for venous thromboembolism (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.54-1.34), and there were no deaths. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty and treated with perioperative warfarin, genotype-guided warfarin dosing, compared with clinically guided dosing, reduced the combined risk of major bleeding, INR of 4 or greater, venous thromboembolism, or death. Further research is needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of personalized warfarin dosing. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT01006733
- 3 October 2017
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 318 (12) , 1115-1124
Open AccessEffect of Genotype-Guided Warfarin Dosing on Clinical Events and Anticoagulation Control Among Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty
Importance Warfarin use accounts for more medication-related emergency department visits among older patients than any other drug. Whether genotype-guided warfarin dosing can prevent these adverse events is unknown. Objective To determine whether genotype-guided dosing improves the safety of warfarin initiation. Design, Setting, and Patients The randomized clinical Genetic Informatics Trial (GIFT) of Warfarin to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis included patients aged 65 years or older initiating warfarin for elective hip or knee arthroplasty and was conducted at 6 US medical centers. Enrollment began in April 2011 and follow-up concluded in October 2016. Interventions Patients were genotyped for the following polymorphisms:VKORC1-1639G>A,CYP2C9*2, CYP2C9*3, andCYP4F2 V433M. In a 2 × 2 factorial design, patients were randomized to genotype-guided (n = 831) or clinically guided (n = 819) warfarin dosing on days 1 through 11 of therapy and to a target international normalized ratio (INR) of either 1.8 or 2.5. The recommended doses of warfarin were open label, but the patients and clinicians were blinded to study group assignment. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the composite of major bleeding, INR of 4 or greater, venous thromboembolism, or death. Patients underwent a screening lower-extremity duplex ultrasound approximately 1 month after arthroplasty. Results Among 1650 randomized patients (mean age, 72.1 years [SD, 5.4 years]; 63.6% women; 91.0% white), 1597 (96.8%) received at least 1 dose of warfarin therapy and completed the trial (n = 808 in genotype-guided group vs n = 789 in clinically guided group). A total of 87 patients (10.8%) in the genotype-guided group vs 116 patients (14.7%) in the clinically guided warfarin dosing group met at least 1 of the end points (absolute difference, 3.9% [95% CI, 0.7%-7.2%],P = .02; relative rate [RR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.56-0.95]). The numbers of individual events in the genotype-guided group vs the clinically guided group were 2 vs 8 for major bleeding (RR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.05-1.15), 56 vs 77 for INR of 4 or greater (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.99), 33 vs 38 for venous thromboembolism (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.54-1.34), and there were no deaths. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty and treated with perioperative warfarin, genotype-guided warfarin dosing, compared with clinically guided dosing, reduced the combined risk of major bleeding, INR of 4 or greater, venous thromboembolism, or death. Further research is needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of personalized warfarin dosing. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT01006733
- 1 February 2017
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Vol. 32 (2) , 645-652
Safety and Efficacy of New Anticoagulants for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis
- 1 February 2017
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Vol. 32 (2) , 645-652
Safety and Efficacy of New Anticoagulants for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis
- 24 August 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
- Vol. 42 (4) , 534
Erratum to: Use of signals and systems engineering to improve the safety of warfarin initiation
- 24 August 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
- Vol. 42 (4) , 534
Erratum to: Use of signals and systems engineering to improve the safety of warfarin initiation
- Open Access
- 21 July 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
- Vol. 42 (4) , 529-533
Use of Signals and Systems Engineering to Improve the Safety of Warfarin Initiation
- 21 July 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
- Vol. 42 (4) , 529-533
Open AccessUse of Signals and Systems Engineering to Improve the Safety of Warfarin Initiation
- 1 July 2016
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 129 (7) , 699-705.e4
A Tool to Assess Risk of De Novo Opioid Abuse or Dependence
- 1 July 2016
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 129 (7) , 699-705.e4
A Tool to Assess Risk of De Novo Opioid Abuse or Dependence
- Open Access
- 7 May 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 30 (10) , 1405
Clinical Benefit of American College of Chest Physicians Versus European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for Stroke Prophylaxis in Atrial Fibrillation
- 7 May 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 30 (10) , 1405
Open AccessClinical Benefit of American College of Chest Physicians Versus European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for Stroke Prophylaxis in Atrial Fibrillation