R. J. Paxton
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
R. J. Paxton has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
A. Estoup
Laboratoire de Génétique des Poissons, CRJ, INRA, domaine de Vilvert, 78352 Jouy‐en‐Josas cedex, France
2 shared publicationsJ. Tengö
Ecological Research Station of Uppsala University, Ölands Skogsby 6280, S‐38693 Färjestaden, Sweden
2 shared publicationsP. Pamilo
Department of Genetics, Uppsala University, Box 7003, S‐75007 Uppsala, Sweden
2 shared publicationsP. A. Thoren
Department of Genetics, Uppsala University, Box 7003, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
1 shared publicationP. A. Thorén
Department of Genetics, Uppsala University, Box 7003, S‐75007 Uppsala, Sweden
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 August 1996
- Published by Wiley in Molecular Ecology
- Vol. 5 (4) , 511-519
Mating structure and nestmate relatedness in a communal bee, Andrena jacobi (Hymenoptera, Andrenidae), using microsatellites
- 1 August 1996
- Published by Wiley in Molecular Ecology
- Vol. 5 (4) , 511-519
Mating structure and nestmate relatedness in a communal bee, Andrena jacobi (Hymenoptera, Andrenidae), using microsatellites
- 1 August 1996
- Published by Wiley in Molecular Ecology
- Vol. 5 (4) , 511-519
Mating structure and nestmate relatedness in a communal bee,Andrena jacobi(Hymenoptera, Andrenidae), using microsatellites
Complex eusocial insect societies are generally matrifilial, suggesting kin selection has been of importance in their development. For simpler social systems, factors favouring their existence, in particular kin selection, have rarely been studied. Communal nesting is one of these simple social organizations, and is found in a diversity of insect species. To examine whether kin selection may play a role in the evolution and maintenance of communality, we estimated genetic relatedness of nestmate females of the facultatively communal bee,Andrena jacobi. Microsatellite loci were developed for this species and used to analyse individuals from two populations. Loci were variable, they were in heterozygote deficit and showed positive inbreeding coefficients. This may arise from nonrandom mating; previous observations (Paxton & Tengö 1996) indicate that a large proportion of females mate intranidally with nestmate males in their natal nests before first emerging. Nestmate relatedness was low, no different from zero for all loci in one population and for three of four loci in the other population. The large number of nestmates sharing a common nest (up to 594) may explain the low relatedness estimates, although relatedness was also independent of the number of females sharing a nest. Lack of inclusive fitness payoffs could constrain social evolution in this communal species.
- 1 August 1996
- Published by Wiley in Molecular Ecology
- Vol. 5 (4) , 511-519
Mating structure and nestmate relatedness in a communal bee,Andrena jacobi(Hymenoptera, Andrenidae), using microsatellites
Complex eusocial insect societies are generally matrifilial, suggesting kin selection has been of importance in their development. For simpler social systems, factors favouring their existence, in particular kin selection, have rarely been studied. Communal nesting is one of these simple social organizations, and is found in a diversity of insect species. To examine whether kin selection may play a role in the evolution and maintenance of communality, we estimated genetic relatedness of nestmate females of the facultatively communal bee,Andrena jacobi. Microsatellite loci were developed for this species and used to analyse individuals from two populations. Loci were variable, they were in heterozygote deficit and showed positive inbreeding coefficients. This may arise from nonrandom mating; previous observations (Paxton & Tengö 1996) indicate that a large proportion of females mate intranidally with nestmate males in their natal nests before first emerging. Nestmate relatedness was low, no different from zero for all loci in one population and for three of four loci in the other population. The large number of nestmates sharing a common nest (up to 594) may explain the low relatedness estimates, although relatedness was also independent of the number of females sharing a nest. Lack of inclusive fitness payoffs could constrain social evolution in this communal species.