Angel Tabullo
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Angel Tabullo has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alejandro Wainselboim
Lingüística y Neurobiología Experimental del Lenguaje (LyNEL), Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales (INCIHUSA)-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CCT), Mendoza 5500, Argentina
4 shared publications Silvano Zanutto
3 shared publicationsAlberto Yorio
Instituto de Medicina y Biología Experimental, Conicet, Vuelta de Obligado 2490 (C1428ADN), Buenos Aires, Argentina
2 shared publications- Alberto Yorio
Universidad de Buenos Aires
1 shared publication - Carolina Gattei
Universidad Torcuato Di Tella
1 shared publication Enrique Segura
Institute of Medicine and Experimental Biology, Conicet, Buenos Aires, Argentina
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 April 2017
- Published by Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicologia Matematic in Interdisciplinaria: Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines
- Vol. 33 (2)
El papel de la estructura argumental en el procesamiento de los compuestos verbo-nombre del español: evidencias experimentales
- 1 April 2017
- Published by Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicologia Matematic in Interdisciplinaria: Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines
- Vol. 33 (2)
Open AccessEl papel de la estructura argumental en el procesamiento de los compuestos verbo-nombre del español: evidencias experimentales
- Open Access
- 1 July 2015
- Published by Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicologia Matematic in Interdisciplinaria: Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines
- Vol. 32 (1)
Transferencia de funciones sintácticas artificiales entre estímulos relacionados por equivalencia: Un estudio de potenciales cerebrales relacionados con eventos
- 1 July 2015
- Published by Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicologia Matematic in Interdisciplinaria: Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines
- Vol. 32 (1)
Open AccessTransferencia de funciones sintácticas artificiales entre estímulos relacionados por equivalencia: Un estudio de potenciales cerebrales relacionados con eventos
- 1 May 2015
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Psychophysiology
- Vol. 96 (2) , 74-83
ERP correlates of priming in language and stimulus equivalence: Evidence of similar N400 effects in absence of semantic content
- 1 May 2015
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Psychophysiology
- Vol. 96 (2) , 74-83
ERP correlates of priming in language and stimulus equivalence: Evidence of similar N400 effects in absence of semantic content
- Open Access
- 1 September 2012
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 65 (9) , 1848-1863
On the Learnability of Frequent and Infrequent Word Orders: An Artificial Language Learning Study
Most languages have a basic or “canonical” word order, which determines the relative positions of the subject (S), the verb (V), and the object (O) in a typical declarative sentence. The frequency of occurrence of the six possible word orders among world languages is not distributed uniformly. While SVO and SOV represent around 85% of world languages, orders like VSO (9%) or OSV (0.5%) are much less frequent or extremely rare. One possible explanation for this asymmetry is that biological and cognitive constraints for structured sequence processing make some word orders easier to be processed than others. Therefore, the high frequency of these word orders would be related to their higher learnability. The aim of the present study was to compare the learnability of different word orders between groups of adult subjects. Four artificial languages with different word orders were trained: two frequent (SVO, SOV) and two infrequent (VSO, OSV). In a test stage, subjects were asked to discriminate between new correct sentences and syntax or semantic violations. Higher performance rates and faster responses were observed for more frequent word orders. The results support the hypothesis that more frequent word orders are more easily learned.
- 1 September 2012
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 65 (9) , 1848-1863
Open AccessOn the Learnability of Frequent and Infrequent Word Orders: An Artificial Language Learning Study
Most languages have a basic or “canonical” word order, which determines the relative positions of the subject (S), the verb (V), and the object (O) in a typical declarative sentence. The frequency of occurrence of the six possible word orders among world languages is not distributed uniformly. While SVO and SOV represent around 85% of world languages, orders like VSO (9%) or OSV (0.5%) are much less frequent or extremely rare. One possible explanation for this asymmetry is that biological and cognitive constraints for structured sequence processing make some word orders easier to be processed than others. Therefore, the high frequency of these word orders would be related to their higher learnability. The aim of the present study was to compare the learnability of different word orders between groups of adult subjects. Four artificial languages with different word orders were trained: two frequent (SVO, SOV) and two infrequent (VSO, OSV). In a test stage, subjects were asked to discriminate between new correct sentences and syntax or semantic violations. Higher performance rates and faster responses were observed for more frequent word orders. The results support the hypothesis that more frequent word orders are more easily learned.