R. John D'A. Honey
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
R. John D'A. Honey has a total of 2 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Michael J. Weir
Division of Urology, Saint Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
1 shared publicationNauman Tariq
Division of Urology, Saint Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 April 2001
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Endourology
- Vol. 15 (3) , 243-246
Electrode Performance Beyond the Manufacturer's Recommended Lifespan Using the Dornier MFL 5000 Lithotripter
Background and Purpose: Electrodes used by the Dornier MFL 500 lithotripter have a specified lifespan, after which, the manufacturer recommends replacing the electrode before continuing the treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate whether electrodes continue to function effectively beyond 100% consumption by measuring the pressure output of electrodes up to 300% consumption or until electrode failure. Materials and Methods: We assessed new, refurbished, and twice-refurbished electrodes to compare their respective performances. Results: Rather than a decrease, there was a trend toward increased pressure output beyond 100% electrode consumption, with no drop in pressure prior to 300% consumption or electrode failure. All three types of electrodes functioned adequately above 100% consumption. Conclusion: These observations suggest that discarding the electrode before the completion of the treatment or electrode failure is not warranted. Using a single electrode rather than multiple electrodes to complete a treatment has the potential to save both time and cost.
- 1 April 2001
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Endourology
- Vol. 15 (3) , 243-246
Electrode Performance Beyond the Manufacturer's Recommended Lifespan Using the Dornier MFL 5000 Lithotripter
Background and Purpose: Electrodes used by the Dornier MFL 500 lithotripter have a specified lifespan, after which, the manufacturer recommends replacing the electrode before continuing the treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate whether electrodes continue to function effectively beyond 100% consumption by measuring the pressure output of electrodes up to 300% consumption or until electrode failure. Materials and Methods: We assessed new, refurbished, and twice-refurbished electrodes to compare their respective performances. Results: Rather than a decrease, there was a trend toward increased pressure output beyond 100% electrode consumption, with no drop in pressure prior to 300% consumption or electrode failure. All three types of electrodes functioned adequately above 100% consumption. Conclusion: These observations suggest that discarding the electrode before the completion of the treatment or electrode failure is not warranted. Using a single electrode rather than multiple electrodes to complete a treatment has the potential to save both time and cost.
- 1 December 1998
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Endourology
- Vol. 12 (6) , 529-531
Assessment of a New Tipless Nitinol Stone Basket and Comparison with an Existing Flat-Wire Basket
Flexible nephroscopes and ureteroscopes make it possible to see calculi in remote calices, but it is often impossible to remove these with existing technology. Flat-wire baskets impede deflection and can traumatize the papilla. This study compares the performance of a new 3.2F tipless nickel-titanium (Nitinol) basket with that of an existing 3.0F flat-wire basket. Specifications were compared using a 15F nephroscope and a 7.5F flexible ureteroscope in a pig kidney model. A calculus was placed in a calix, and the author and two residents were timed while using both baskets to retrieve the stone. To open fully, the flat-wire basket needed to protrude 1.2 cm further than the tipless basket. The tipless basket did not restrict deflection of the nephroscope, whereas the flat-wire basket limited flexion by 24° and extension by 28°. The tipless basket did not restrict extension of the 7.5F ureteroscope but limited flexion by 10°. The flat-wire basket limited flexion by 79° and extension by 72°. Using the pig kidney model, the three operators took a mean of 5.3, 11.8, and 6.4 seconds to catch the stone with the tipless basket. Using the flat-wire basket, the mean times were 15.3, 34.5, and 28.9 seconds (combined data: 8.2 seconds for the tipless basket and 27.8 seconds with the flat-wire basket; P = 0.0001). Only the flat-wire basket was seen to traumatize the papilla. The Nitinol tipless basket has significant advantages over the flat-wire basket.
- 1 December 1998
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Endourology
- Vol. 12 (6) , 529-531
Assessment of a New Tipless Nitinol Stone Basket and Comparison with an Existing Flat-Wire Basket
Flexible nephroscopes and ureteroscopes make it possible to see calculi in remote calices, but it is often impossible to remove these with existing technology. Flat-wire baskets impede deflection and can traumatize the papilla. This study compares the performance of a new 3.2F tipless nickel-titanium (Nitinol) basket with that of an existing 3.0F flat-wire basket. Specifications were compared using a 15F nephroscope and a 7.5F flexible ureteroscope in a pig kidney model. A calculus was placed in a calix, and the author and two residents were timed while using both baskets to retrieve the stone. To open fully, the flat-wire basket needed to protrude 1.2 cm further than the tipless basket. The tipless basket did not restrict deflection of the nephroscope, whereas the flat-wire basket limited flexion by 24° and extension by 28°. The tipless basket did not restrict extension of the 7.5F ureteroscope but limited flexion by 10°. The flat-wire basket limited flexion by 79° and extension by 72°. Using the pig kidney model, the three operators took a mean of 5.3, 11.8, and 6.4 seconds to catch the stone with the tipless basket. Using the flat-wire basket, the mean times were 15.3, 34.5, and 28.9 seconds (combined data: 8.2 seconds for the tipless basket and 27.8 seconds with the flat-wire basket; P = 0.0001). Only the flat-wire basket was seen to traumatize the papilla. The Nitinol tipless basket has significant advantages over the flat-wire basket.