Tsvi Piran
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Tsvi Piran has a total of 41 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Re'Em Sari
Racah Institute, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
7 shared publications - Jonathan Granot
Racah Institute, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
3 shared publications - Evgeny Sorkin
The Racah Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
2 shared publications - Jonathan Granot
The Open University of Israel
2 shared publications - Ramesh Narayan
Center for Astrophysics ∣ Harvard & Smithsonian, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
2 shared publications /Hebrew U.
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 22 November 2012
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Gamma-ray Bursts
Cosmic gamma ray bursts (GRBs) have fascinated scientists and the public alike since their discovery in the late 1960s. Their story is told here by some of the scientists who participated in their discovery and, after many decades of false starts, solved the problem of their origin. Fourteen chapters by active researchers in the field present a detailed history of the discovery, a comprehensive theoretical description of GRB central engine and emission models, a discussion of GRB host galaxies and a guide to how GRBs can be used as cosmological tools. Observations are grouped into three sets from the satellites CGRO, BeppoSAX and Swift, and followed by a discussion of multi-wavelength observations. This is the first edited volume on GRB astrophysics that presents a fully comprehensive review of the subject. Utilizing the latest research, Gamma-ray Bursts is an essential desktop companion for graduate students and researchers in astrophysics.
- 22 November 2012
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Gamma-ray Bursts
Cosmic gamma ray bursts (GRBs) have fascinated scientists and the public alike since their discovery in the late 1960s. Their story is told here by some of the scientists who participated in their discovery and, after many decades of false starts, solved the problem of their origin. Fourteen chapters by active researchers in the field present a detailed history of the discovery, a comprehensive theoretical description of GRB central engine and emission models, a discussion of GRB host galaxies and a guide to how GRBs can be used as cosmological tools. Observations are grouped into three sets from the satellites CGRO, BeppoSAX and Swift, and followed by a discussion of multi-wavelength observations. This is the first edited volume on GRB astrophysics that presents a fully comprehensive review of the subject. Utilizing the latest research, Gamma-ray Bursts is an essential desktop companion for graduate students and researchers in astrophysics.
- 18 November 2011
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Vol. 418 (3) , 2106-2108
Erratum: The late jet in gamma-ray bursts and its interactions with a supernova ejecta and a cocoon
- 18 November 2011
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Vol. 418 (3) , 2106-2108
Erratum: The late jet in gamma-ray bursts and its interactions with a supernova ejecta and a cocoon
- 17 January 2006
- Published by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)
Implications of the Early X-Ray Afterglow Light Curves of Swift GRBs
According to current models, gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are produced when the energy carried by a relativistic outflow is dissipated and converted into radiation. The efficiency of this process, {epsilon}{sub {gamma}}, is one of the critical factors in any GRB model. The X-ray afterglow light curves of Swift GRBs show an early stage of flattish decay. This has been interpreted as reflecting energy injection. When combined with previous estimates, which have concluded that the kinetic energy of the late ({approx}> 10 hr) afterglow is comparable to the energy emitted in {gamma}-rays, this interpretation implies very high values of {epsilon}{sub {gamma}}, corresponding to {approx}> 90% of the initial energy being converted into {gamma}-rays. Such a high efficiency is hard to reconcile with most models, including in particular the popular internal-shocks model. We re-analyze the derivation of the kinetic energy from the afterglow X-ray flux and re-examine the resulting estimates of the efficiency. We confirm that, if the flattish decay arises from energy injection and the pre-Swift broad-band estimates of the kinetic energy are correct, then {epsilon}{sub {gamma}} {approx}> 0.9. We discuss various issues related to this result, including an alternative interpretation of the light curve in terms of a two-component outflow model,more » which we apply to the X-ray observations of GRB 050315. We point out, however, that another interpretation of the flattish decay--a variable X-ray afterglow efficiency (e.g., due to a time dependence of afterglow shock microphysical parameters)--is possible. We also show that direct estimates of the kinetic energy from the late X-ray afterglow flux are sensitive to the assumed values of the shock microphysical parameters and suggest that broad-band afterglow fits might have underestimated the kinetic energy (e.g., by overestimating the fraction of electrons that are accelerated to relativistic energies). Either one of these possibilities implies a lower {gamma}-ray efficiency, and their joint effect could conceivably reduce the estimate of the typical {epsilon}{sub {gamma}} to a value in the range {approx} 0.1-0.5. « less
- 17 January 2006
- Published by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)
Implications of the Early X-Ray Afterglow Light Curves of Swift GRBs
According to current models, gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are produced when the energy carried by a relativistic outflow is dissipated and converted into radiation. The efficiency of this process, {epsilon}{sub {gamma}}, is one of the critical factors in any GRB model. The X-ray afterglow light curves of Swift GRBs show an early stage of flattish decay. This has been interpreted as reflecting energy injection. When combined with previous estimates, which have concluded that the kinetic energy of the late ({approx}> 10 hr) afterglow is comparable to the energy emitted in {gamma}-rays, this interpretation implies very high values of {epsilon}{sub {gamma}}, corresponding to {approx}> 90% of the initial energy being converted into {gamma}-rays. Such a high efficiency is hard to reconcile with most models, including in particular the popular internal-shocks model. We re-analyze the derivation of the kinetic energy from the afterglow X-ray flux and re-examine the resulting estimates of the efficiency. We confirm that, if the flattish decay arises from energy injection and the pre-Swift broad-band estimates of the kinetic energy are correct, then {epsilon}{sub {gamma}} {approx}> 0.9. We discuss various issues related to this result, including an alternative interpretation of the light curve in terms of a two-component outflow model,more » which we apply to the X-ray observations of GRB 050315. We point out, however, that another interpretation of the flattish decay--a variable X-ray afterglow efficiency (e.g., due to a time dependence of afterglow shock microphysical parameters)--is possible. We also show that direct estimates of the kinetic energy from the late X-ray afterglow flux are sensitive to the assumed values of the shock microphysical parameters and suggest that broad-band afterglow fits might have underestimated the kinetic energy (e.g., by overestimating the fraction of electrons that are accelerated to relativistic energies). Either one of these possibilities implies a lower {gamma}-ray efficiency, and their joint effect could conceivably reduce the estimate of the typical {epsilon}{sub {gamma}} to a value in the range {approx} 0.1-0.5. « less
- Open Access
Energetics of Gamma Ray Bursts
We determine the distribution of total energy emitted by gamma-ray bursts for bursts with fluences and distance information. Our core sample consists of eight bursts with BATSE spectra and spectroscopic redshifts. We extend this sample by adding four bursts with BATSE spectra and host galaxy R magnitudes. From these R magnitudes we calculate a redshift probability distribution; this method requires a model of the host galaxy population. From a sample of ten bursts with both spectroscopic redshifts and host galaxy R magnitudes (some do not have BATSE spectra) we find that the burst rate is proportional to the galaxy luminosity at the epoch of the burst. Assuming that the total energy emitted has a log-normal distribution, we find that the average emitted energy (assumed to be radiated isotropically) is $ = 1.3^{+1.2}_{-1.0} \times 10^{53}$ ergs (for H$_0$ = 65 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_m=0.3$ and $\Omega_\Lambda=0.7$); the distribution has a logarithmic width of $\sigma_\gamma=1.7^{+0.7}_{-0.3}$. The corresponding distribution of X-ray afterglow energy (for seven bursts) has $ = 4.0^{+1.6}_{-1.8} \times 10^{51}$ergs and $\sigma_X = 1.3^{+0.4}_{-0.3}$. For completeness, we also provide spectral fits for all bursts with BATSE spectra for which there were afterglow searches.Open AccessEnergetics of Gamma Ray Bursts
We determine the distribution of total energy emitted by gamma-ray bursts for bursts with fluences and distance information. Our core sample consists of eight bursts with BATSE spectra and spectroscopic redshifts. We extend this sample by adding four bursts with BATSE spectra and host galaxy R magnitudes. From these R magnitudes we calculate a redshift probability distribution; this method requires a model of the host galaxy population. From a sample of ten bursts with both spectroscopic redshifts and host galaxy R magnitudes (some do not have BATSE spectra) we find that the burst rate is proportional to the galaxy luminosity at the epoch of the burst. Assuming that the total energy emitted has a log-normal distribution, we find that the average emitted energy (assumed to be radiated isotropically) is $ = 1.3^{+1.2}_{-1.0} \times 10^{53}$ ergs (for H$_0$ = 65 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_m=0.3$ and $\Omega_\Lambda=0.7$); the distribution has a logarithmic width of $\sigma_\gamma=1.7^{+0.7}_{-0.3}$. The corresponding distribution of X-ray afterglow energy (for seven bursts) has $ = 4.0^{+1.6}_{-1.8} \times 10^{51}$ergs and $\sigma_X = 1.3^{+0.4}_{-0.3}$. For completeness, we also provide spectral fits for all bursts with BATSE spectra for which there were afterglow searches. - 13 March 2001
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review D
- Vol. 63 (8) , 084006
Effects of pair creation on charged gravitational collapse
We investigate the effects of pair creation on the internal geometry of a black hole, which forms during the gravitational collapse of a charged massless scalar field. Classically, a strong central Schwarzschild-like singularity forms, and a null, weak, mass-inflation singularity arises along the Cauchy horizon, in such a collapse. We consider here the discharge, due to pair creation, below the event horizon and its influence on the dynamical formation of the Cauchy horizon. Within the framework of a simple model we are able to trace numerically the collapse. We find that a part of the Cauchy horizon is replaced by the strong spacelike central singularity. This fraction depends on the value of the critical electric field for the pair creation.- 13 March 2001
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review D
- Vol. 63 (8) , 084006
Effects of pair creation on charged gravitational collapse
We investigate the effects of pair creation on the internal geometry of a black hole, which forms during the gravitational collapse of a charged massless scalar field. Classically, a strong central Schwarzschild-like singularity forms, and a null, weak, mass-inflation singularity arises along the Cauchy horizon, in such a collapse. We consider here the discharge, due to pair creation, below the event horizon and its influence on the dynamical formation of the Cauchy horizon. Within the framework of a simple model we are able to trace numerically the collapse. We find that a part of the Cauchy horizon is replaced by the strong spacelike central singularity. This fraction depends on the value of the critical electric field for the pair creation.- Open Access
Effects of Pair Creation on Charged Gravitational Collapse
We investigate the effects of pair creation on the internal geometry of a black hole, which forms during the gravitational collapse of a charged massless scalar field. Classically, strong central Schwarzschild-like singularity forms, and a null, weak, mass-inflation singularity arises along the Cauchy horizon, in such a collapse. We consider here the discharge, due to pair creation, below the event horizon and its influence on the {\it dynamical formation} of the Cauchy horizon. Within the framework of a simple model we are able to trace numerically the collapse. We find that a part of the Cauchy horizon is replaced by the strong space-like central singularity. This fraction depends on the value of the critical electric field, $E_{\rm cr}$, for the pair creation.Open AccessEffects of Pair Creation on Charged Gravitational Collapse
We investigate the effects of pair creation on the internal geometry of a black hole, which forms during the gravitational collapse of a charged massless scalar field. Classically, strong central Schwarzschild-like singularity forms, and a null, weak, mass-inflation singularity arises along the Cauchy horizon, in such a collapse. We consider here the discharge, due to pair creation, below the event horizon and its influence on the {\it dynamical formation} of the Cauchy horizon. Within the framework of a simple model we are able to trace numerically the collapse. We find that a part of the Cauchy horizon is replaced by the strong space-like central singularity. This fraction depends on the value of the critical electric field, $E_{\rm cr}$, for the pair creation. - Open Access
A Model of Void Formation
We introduce a simple model for the formation of voids. In this model the underdensity of galaxies in voids is the product of two factors. The first arises from a gravitational expansion of the negative density perturbation. The second is due to biasing: galaxies are less likely to form in an underdense region. One feature of the model is an upper cutoff in void sizes. We calculate the volume filling factor of characteristic voids for different CDM models and find that our formation model points to $\Lambda$CDM models as preferred models of the power spectrum. A natural consequence of our model is that the underdensity of the dark matter inside voids is smaller than the galaxy underdensity.
Open AccessA Model of Void Formation
We introduce a simple model for the formation of voids. In this model the underdensity of galaxies in voids is the product of two factors. The first arises from a gravitational expansion of the negative density perturbation. The second is due to biasing: galaxies are less likely to form in an underdense region. One feature of the model is an upper cutoff in void sizes. We calculate the volume filling factor of characteristic voids for different CDM models and find that our formation model points to $\Lambda$CDM models as preferred models of the power spectrum. A natural consequence of our model is that the underdensity of the dark matter inside voids is smaller than the galaxy underdensity.
- Open Access
The Synchrotron Spectrum of Fast Cooling Electrons Revisited
We discuss the spectrum arising from synchrotron emission by fast cooling (FC) electrons, when fresh electrons are continually accelerated by a strong blast wave, into a power law distribution of energies. The FC spectrum was so far described by four power law segments divided by three break frequencies $\nu_{sa} < \nu_{c} < \nu_{m}$. This is valid for a homogeneous electron distribution. However, hot electrons are located right after the shock, while most electrons are farther down stream and have cooled. This spatial distribution changes the optically thick part of the spectrum, introducing a new break frequency, $\nu_{ac} < \nu_{sa}$, and a new spectral slope, $F_{\nu }\propto \nu^{11/8}$ for $\nu_{ac} < \nu < \nu_{sa}$. The familiar $F_{\nu }\propto \nu ^{2}$ holds only for $\nu < \nu_{ac}$. This ordering of the break frequencies is relevant for typical gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows in an ISM environment. Other possibilities arise for internal shocks or afterglows in dense circumstellar winds. We discuss possible implications of this spectrum for GRBs and their afterglows, in the context of the internal-external shock model. Observations of $F_{\nu} \propto \nu^{11/8}$ would enable us to probe scales much smaller than the typical size of the system, and constrain the amount of turbulent mixing behind the shock.Open AccessThe Synchrotron Spectrum of Fast Cooling Electrons Revisited
We discuss the spectrum arising from synchrotron emission by fast cooling (FC) electrons, when fresh electrons are continually accelerated by a strong blast wave, into a power law distribution of energies. The FC spectrum was so far described by four power law segments divided by three break frequencies $\nu_{sa} < \nu_{c} < \nu_{m}$. This is valid for a homogeneous electron distribution. However, hot electrons are located right after the shock, while most electrons are farther down stream and have cooled. This spatial distribution changes the optically thick part of the spectrum, introducing a new break frequency, $\nu_{ac} < \nu_{sa}$, and a new spectral slope, $F_{\nu }\propto \nu^{11/8}$ for $\nu_{ac} < \nu < \nu_{sa}$. The familiar $F_{\nu }\propto \nu ^{2}$ holds only for $\nu < \nu_{ac}$. This ordering of the break frequencies is relevant for typical gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows in an ISM environment. Other possibilities arise for internal shocks or afterglows in dense circumstellar winds. We discuss possible implications of this spectrum for GRBs and their afterglows, in the context of the internal-external shock model. Observations of $F_{\nu} \propto \nu^{11/8}$ would enable us to probe scales much smaller than the typical size of the system, and constrain the amount of turbulent mixing behind the shock. - Open Access
- 10 December 1999
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 527 (1) , 236-246
Synchrotron Self‐Absorption in Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglow
GRB afterglow is reasonably described by synchrotron emission from relativistic blast waves at cosmological distances. We perform detailed calculations taking into account the effect of synchrotron self absorption. We consider emission from the whole region behind the shock front, and use the Blandford McKee self similar solution to describe the fluid behind the shock. We calculate the spectra and the observed image of a GRB afterglow near the self absorption frequency $\nu_a$ and derive an accurate expression for $\nu_a$. We show that the image is rather homogeneous for $\nu<\nu_a$, as opposed to the bright ring at the outer edge and dim center, which appear at higher frequencies. We compare the spectra we obtain to radio observations of GRB970508. We combine the calculations of the spectra near the self absorption frequency with other parts of the spectra and obtain revised estimates for the physical parameters of the burst: $E_{52}=0.53$, $\epsilon_e=0.57$, $\epsilon_B=0.0082$, $n_1=5.3$. These estimates are different by up to two orders of magnitude than the estimates based on an approximate spectrum.Comment: 19 page latex file including 6 figures and 1 tabl- 10 December 1999
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 527 (1) , 236-246
Open AccessSynchrotron Self‐Absorption in Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglow
GRB afterglow is reasonably described by synchrotron emission from relativistic blast waves at cosmological distances. We perform detailed calculations taking into account the effect of synchrotron self absorption. We consider emission from the whole region behind the shock front, and use the Blandford McKee self similar solution to describe the fluid behind the shock. We calculate the spectra and the observed image of a GRB afterglow near the self absorption frequency $\nu_a$ and derive an accurate expression for $\nu_a$. We show that the image is rather homogeneous for $\nu<\nu_a$, as opposed to the bright ring at the outer edge and dim center, which appear at higher frequencies. We compare the spectra we obtain to radio observations of GRB970508. We combine the calculations of the spectra near the self absorption frequency with other parts of the spectra and obtain revised estimates for the physical parameters of the burst: $E_{52}=0.53$, $\epsilon_e=0.57$, $\epsilon_B=0.0082$, $n_1=5.3$. These estimates are different by up to two orders of magnitude than the estimates based on an approximate spectrum.Comment: 19 page latex file including 6 figures and 1 tabl - Open Access
- 10 March 1999
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 513 (2) , 679-689
Images and Spectra from the Interior of a Relativistic Fireball
The detection of an afterglow, following a gamma-ray burst (GRB), can be described reasonably well by synchrotron emission from a relativistic spherical expanding blast wave, driven by an expanding fireball. We perform detailed calculations considering the emission from the whole region behind the shock front. We use the Blandford McKee self similar adiabatic solution to describe the fluid behind the shock. Using this detailed model, we derive expressions for the peak flux, and the peak frequency at a given observed time. These expressions provide important numerical corrections to previous, more simplified models. We calculate the observed light curve and spectra for several magnetic field models. We show that both the light curve and the spectra are flat near the peak. This rules out the interpretation of the optical peak of GRB970508 as the peak of the light curve, predicted by the existing fireball models. We calculate the observed image of a GRB afterglow. The observed image is bright near the edge and dimmer at the center, thus creating a ring. The contrast between the edge and the center is larger at high frequencies and the width of the ring is smaller.Comment: 32 page latex file including 14 figures and 2 table
- 10 March 1999
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 513 (2) , 679-689
Open AccessImages and Spectra from the Interior of a Relativistic Fireball
The detection of an afterglow, following a gamma-ray burst (GRB), can be described reasonably well by synchrotron emission from a relativistic spherical expanding blast wave, driven by an expanding fireball. We perform detailed calculations considering the emission from the whole region behind the shock front. We use the Blandford McKee self similar adiabatic solution to describe the fluid behind the shock. Using this detailed model, we derive expressions for the peak flux, and the peak frequency at a given observed time. These expressions provide important numerical corrections to previous, more simplified models. We calculate the observed light curve and spectra for several magnetic field models. We show that both the light curve and the spectra are flat near the peak. This rules out the interpretation of the optical peak of GRB970508 as the peak of the light curve, predicted by the existing fireball models. We calculate the observed image of a GRB afterglow. The observed image is bright near the edge and dimmer at the center, thus creating a ring. The contrast between the edge and the center is larger at high frequencies and the width of the ring is smaller.Comment: 32 page latex file including 14 figures and 2 table