John A. Clarke
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
John A. Clarke has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Andrew Marrington
Queensland University of Technology
1 shared publication - Carole Quinn
Queensland University of Technology
1 shared publication - Ian Stoodley
Science and Engineering Faculty, University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
1 shared publication K. Nelson
Queensland Univ Technol, Student Success & Retent Team, Learning & Teaching Unit, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
1 shared publication- Karen J. Nelson
Office of Teaching Quality , Queensland University of Technology , Brisbane , Australia
1 shared publication - Tracy Creagh
Queensland University of Technology
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 8 October 2014
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Higher Education Research & Development
- Vol. 34 (2) , 351-367
Using a Capability Maturity Model to build on the generational approach to student engagement practices
- 8 October 2014
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Higher Education Research & Development
- Vol. 34 (2) , 351-367
Using a Capability Maturity Model to build on the generational approach to student engagement practices
- 31 March 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in Higher Education
- Vol. 63 (1) , 83-96
Good practice for enhancing the engagement and success of commencing students
- 31 March 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in Higher Education
- Vol. 63 (1) , 83-96
Good practice for enhancing the engagement and success of commencing students
- 1 April 1998
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Higher Education Research & Development
- Vol. 17 (1) , 107-117
Students' Perceptions of Different Tertiary Learning Environments
In this study of students' perceptions of six different tertiary learning environments, 1,249 students indicated the behaviours and practices that helped or hindered their learning and why. Irrespective of the type of learning environment, students felt that their learning was helped when learning experiences were practical and experiential. Students also felt that their learning was helped when the presentation and explanation were clear. These learning conditions clarified their understanding and consolidated their learning. Learning was hindered when the pace of presentation was inappropriately fast or slow and the presentation was unclear. Learning in each particular type of environment was also helped or hindered by conditions and behaviours idiosyncratic to that environment. These conditions and the reason for their effects are identified and discussed. Although many are predictable, they reinforce the notions, first, that different learning environments are designed to, and in practice do, produce different learning outcomes and, second, that students are capable of discriminating between what they consider to be good and bad educational experiences. What students regard as “good”, however, provides a challenge for tertiary educators and staff developers.
- 1 April 1998
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Higher Education Research & Development
- Vol. 17 (1) , 107-117
Students' Perceptions of Different Tertiary Learning Environments
In this study of students' perceptions of six different tertiary learning environments, 1,249 students indicated the behaviours and practices that helped or hindered their learning and why. Irrespective of the type of learning environment, students felt that their learning was helped when learning experiences were practical and experiential. Students also felt that their learning was helped when the presentation and explanation were clear. These learning conditions clarified their understanding and consolidated their learning. Learning was hindered when the pace of presentation was inappropriately fast or slow and the presentation was unclear. Learning in each particular type of environment was also helped or hindered by conditions and behaviours idiosyncratic to that environment. These conditions and the reason for their effects are identified and discussed. Although many are predictable, they reinforce the notions, first, that different learning environments are designed to, and in practice do, produce different learning outcomes and, second, that students are capable of discriminating between what they consider to be good and bad educational experiences. What students regard as “good”, however, provides a challenge for tertiary educators and staff developers.