Robert G. Gregory
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Robert G. Gregory has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- A. Abigail Payne
Department of Economics, McMaster University
1 shared publication - Daniel McFadden
University of California
1 shared publication Eva Klug
Economics Program, Research School of Social Sciences, the Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
1 shared publication- Jason Potts
RMIT University
1 shared publication - Orley Ashenfelter
Princeton University
1 shared publication Prem J. Thapa
Economics Program, Research School of Social Sciences, the Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 10 April 2019
- Published by Wiley in Contemporary Economic Policy
- Vol. 38 (1) , 7-29
ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION ON IMMIGRATION
- 10 April 2019
- Published by Wiley in Contemporary Economic Policy
- Vol. 38 (1) , 7-29
ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION ON IMMIGRATION
- 3 October 2016
- Published by Wiley in Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
- Vol. 60 (4) , 647-648
Comment 1 on ‘Booming sector economics’ by Freebairn
- 3 October 2016
- Published by Wiley in Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
- Vol. 60 (4) , 647-648
Comment 1 on ‘Booming sector economics’ by Freebairn
- Open Access
- 30 May 2013
- Published by Wiley in Australian Economic Review
- Vol. 46 (2) , 202-215
The Henderson Question? The Melbourne Institute and 50 Years of Welfare Policy
I discuss selected research contributions of the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research to 50 years of welfare policy for those of workforce age and focus particularly on the policy focus of R. F. Henderson, the inaugural director. Following the spirit of his 1960s poverty research, in the mid‐1970s, government doubled unemployment allowances in real terms and increased pensions by approximately 40 per cent. Both income support payments were to be indexed by average wage increases. At the time, unemployment was typically around 1 per cent and the pension take‐up for those of workforce age was also limited. Today, income support take‐up rates have probably increased fivefold. In response, government has adopted a ‘make work pay’ policy over the last two decades and indexed allowances for Consumer Price Index increases and allowances have fallen by 25–35 per cent, relative to community living standards. Pensions continue to be indexed by average wage changes. I address a range of questions arising from this experience, including: Why has government abandoned the Henderson recommendations?; Is there any evidence that a ‘make work pay’ policy is working?
- 30 May 2013
- Published by Wiley in Australian Economic Review
- Vol. 46 (2) , 202-215
Open AccessThe Henderson Question? The Melbourne Institute and 50 Years of Welfare Policy
I discuss selected research contributions of the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research to 50 years of welfare policy for those of workforce age and focus particularly on the policy focus of R. F. Henderson, the inaugural director. Following the spirit of his 1960s poverty research, in the mid‐1970s, government doubled unemployment allowances in real terms and increased pensions by approximately 40 per cent. Both income support payments were to be indexed by average wage increases. At the time, unemployment was typically around 1 per cent and the pension take‐up for those of workforce age was also limited. Today, income support take‐up rates have probably increased fivefold. In response, government has adopted a ‘make work pay’ policy over the last two decades and indexed allowances for Consumer Price Index increases and allowances have fallen by 25–35 per cent, relative to community living standards. Pensions continue to be indexed by average wage changes. I address a range of questions arising from this experience, including: Why has government abandoned the Henderson recommendations?; Is there any evidence that a ‘make work pay’ policy is working?
- Open Access
- 27 March 2012
- Published by Wiley in Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
- Vol. 56 (2) , 171-200
Living standards, terms of trade and foreign ownership: reflections on the Australian mining boom*
Australia is experiencing its largest mining boom for more than a century and a half. This paper explores, from a national perspective, important economic differences that arise when a mining boom, such as the current one, is generated by sustained export price increases (trading gains) rather than export volume increases. Since 2003, the terms of trade changes – through their direct trading gain effect and indirect real GDP effects – have increased Australian living standards. The increase, measured from official data and relative to the United States, is about 25 per cent; an increase that probably places Australian living standards well above those of the United States. But official data inadequately adjusts for foreign ownership of mining resources suggesting that this estimate is probably a little too high.
- 27 March 2012
- Published by Wiley in Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
- Vol. 56 (2) , 171-200
Open AccessLiving standards, terms of trade and foreign ownership: reflections on the Australian mining boom*
Australia is experiencing its largest mining boom for more than a century and a half. This paper explores, from a national perspective, important economic differences that arise when a mining boom, such as the current one, is generated by sustained export price increases (trading gains) rather than export volume increases. Since 2003, the terms of trade changes – through their direct trading gain effect and indirect real GDP effects – have increased Australian living standards. The increase, measured from official data and relative to the United States, is about 25 per cent; an increase that probably places Australian living standards well above those of the United States. But official data inadequately adjusts for foreign ownership of mining resources suggesting that this estimate is probably a little too high.
- 1 September 2008
- Published by Wiley in Economic Record
- Vol. 84 (266) , 291-309
Cut-offs, Knock-ons and Welfare Payment Taper Changes: An Evaluation of the July 2000 Tax and Welfare Changes for Lone Mothers*
- 1 September 2008
- Published by Wiley in Economic Record
- Vol. 84 (266) , 291-309
Cut-offs, Knock-ons and Welfare Payment Taper Changes: An Evaluation of the July 2000 Tax and Welfare Changes for Lone Mothers*