Gerhard Schmidmaier

Delayed union or nonunion are frequent and feared complications in fracture treatment. Animal models of impaired bone healing are rare. Moreover, specific descriptions are limited although understanding of the biological course of pathogenesis of fracture nonunion is essential for therapeutic approaches.

Growth factors are in clinical use to stimulate bone growth and regeneration. BMP-2 is used in long bone and spinal surgery, PDGFbb for the treatment of periodontal defects and children with growth hormone receptor deficiency are treated with IGF-I.

Large bony defects often show a delayed healing and have an increasing risk of infection. Several materials are used for the coverage of large defects. These materials must be biocompatible, easy to use, and must have an appropriate stability to present a mechanical hindrance. Aim of this study was to investigate two different biodegradable membranes for defect coverage in a sheep model. Round cranial defects (1.5 cm diameter) were created in sheep. Six different treatments were investigated: defects without membrane, defects covered with a poly(d,l‐lactide) or with a 70/30 poly(l/d,l‐lactide) membrane and all defects with or without spongiosa filling. The sheep were sacrificed 12 or 24 weeks postoperatively. Bone formation in the defects was quantified by computer‐assisted measurements of the area of the residual defect on CT radiographs. Histomorphometry and host‐tissue response were evaluated by light microscopy. The biocompatibility was investigated by analyzing the amount of osteoclasts and foreign body cells. Both membranes served as a mechanical hindrance to prevent the prolapse of soft tissue into the defect. The biocompatibility test revealed no differences in the amount and distribution of osteoclasts at the two investigated time points and between the investigated groups. No negative effect on the tissue regeneration was detectable between the investigated groups related to the type of membrane, but a foreign body reaction around the two membrane types was observed. In the membrane‐covered defects, the spongiosa showed a progressing remodeling to the native bony structure of the cranium. The groups without spongiosa partly revealed new bone formation, without complete bridging in any group or at any time point. Comparing the 12 and 24 weeks groups, an increased bone formation was detectable at the later time point. In conclusion, the results of the present in vivo study reveal a good biocompatibility and prevention of soft tissue prolapse of the two used membranes without differences between the membranes. An enhanced remodeling of the spongiosa into native bony structures under the membranes was detectable, but no osteopromoting effect was observed due to the membranes.

Demographic data reveal that due to the increasing aging of the population, complications with the musculoskeletal system will increase in the next years. One major problem in orthopedic and trauma surgery are the delayed healing or non-unions of long bone fractures. The exogenous application of growth factors can stimulate the bone healing to reduce these complications. Beside the choice of the optimal growth factor the application system is important. Therefore, we developed a new bioactive coating method for implants, which is based on a biodegradable poly(D,L-lactide) (coating thickness: 10 μm).This coating allows the incorporation of growth factors and the controlled release of these factors during the healing process without the need for further devices. The effect of different growth factors (IGF-I, TGF-β1, and BMP-2) locally released from coated intramedullary implants on fracture healing was investigated with biomechanical and histological analysis in rats. All investigated growth factors stimulated the fracture healing as assessed with biomechanical tests and histological analysis. The local application of combined IGF-I and TGF-β1 had the most stimulating effect on fracture healing, followed by the effect of BMP-2, IGF-I, and TGF-β1 alone. Bioactive coating of biomechanical well-established implants can on the one hand stabilize the fracture and on the other hand stimulate healing processes to increase healing and to reduce the rate of complications.