Peter D. Jones

Induced sputum using hypertonic saline (HS) is a useful research tool to study airway inflammation (AI). HS provocation testing can also be used to measure airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). A combined HS challenge and sputum induction procedure has been developed to permit assessment of AI and AHR in a single test. The aim of this study is to report the success and tolerability of sputum induction alone, and in combination with a HS bronchial provocation challenge. Sputum induction alone was performed with β2-agonist pretreatment. In the combined challenge, no β2-agonist pretreatment was used. A high-output ultrasonic nebulizer with valve box and tubing were used to deliver 4.5% saline in doubling time periods from 0.5 s to 4 min. Outcomes assessed were completion of the test protocol, adequacy of sputum samples, decrease in FEV1, and adverse effects during the procedure. Fifty-three children who underwent a sputum induction alone, and 182 children who underwent a combined sputum induction and bronchial provocation using HS. Sputum induction alone was well tolerated, with 98% of children completing the procedure and only 4% experiencing a significant (> 15%) fall in FEV1. An adequate sample of sputum was obtained in 92% of children. The combined challenge was completed by 90% of children. A distressing cough occurred in 13% of children and irritation of the mucosa in 1% of children. In the combined challenge an adequate sample of sputum was obtained in significantly fewer children than with sputum induction alone (70% versus 92%, p < 0.05). Sputum cellular changes reflected the shorter nebulization time with sputum induction alone. We conclude that induction of sputum using HS after pretreatment with bronchodilator is well tolerated with a high success rate in children. Combining the HS challenge with sputum induction provides additional information and is a useful means of comparing AHR and AI simultaneously, but at the expense of having a reduced success rate in obtaining an adequate sample of sputum, as well as increased side effects.

Inflammation with infiltrations of eosinophils and mast cells into the walls of airways is considered to increase airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), which in turn characterizes asthma. We present a child with AHR in whom the clinical course of asthma was related to eosinophilic bronchitis. Our patient was admitted at age 6 months with bronchiolitis and at age 4 years with asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids were begun at age 7 years. At age 8 he developed a meningeal sarcoma. While on chemotherapy, his asthma symptoms resolved and he no longer required prophylactic asthma treatment. After 14 months off all chemotherapy, he again had mild episodic asthma. While receiving chemotherapy for malignancy, he had an admission with a coagulase negative staphylococcal bacteremia. During sputum induction with 4.5% saline, he developed cough, wheeze, and a 20% reduction in peak expiratory flow (220 to 180 L/min) that reversed after treatment with salbutamol. The sputum cell count was 1.7 × 10⁶/ml with 1.1 × 10⁶ being neutrophils. Two weeks later and prior to the induction of the second sputum, a 21% increase in FEV₁ was recorded after bronchodilator inhalation (82% to 99% of predicted). The second sputum contained 2.7 × 10⁶/ml cells with 1.6 × 10⁶/ml neutrophils. Neither eosinophils nor mast cells were identified in the sputum. A third sputum obtained 14 months after the cessation of chemotherapy showed a sputum cell count of 16 × 10⁶/ml, with 11.6 × 10⁶ neutrophils and 0.4 × 10⁶ eosinophils; no mast cells were detected. A reversible 15% reduction in FEV₁ was detected on hypertonic saline challenge testing. This boy had persistent airway hyperreactivity and reversible airways obstruction on three occasions during and following chemotherapy. When he developed asthma symptoms, his sputum contained neutrophils and eosinophils; while on chemotherapy his sputum did not contain eosinophils and he was symptom‐free and off all asthma therapy. One can speculate that chemotherapy for malignancy can induce a remission in asthma symptoms but not AHR, and remission in symptoms is associated with a lack of eosinophilic or mast cell infiltrates in the sputum. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998; 25:74–77.