BRBrian M. Rivers

Brian M. Rivers

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Brian M. Rivers has a total of 36 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Perceptions of Prostate Cancer Screening Controversy and Informed Decision Making: Implications for Development of a Targeted Decision Aid for Unaffected Male First-Degree Relatives

    by Clement K. Gwede, Stacy N. Davis, Shaenelle Wilson, Mitul Patel, Susan T. Vadaparampil, Cathy D. Meade, Brian M. Rivers, Daohai Yu, Javier Torres-Roca, Randy Heysek, et al.

    Purpose.: First-degree relatives (FDRs) of prostate cancer (PC) patients should consider multiple concurrent personal risk factors when engaging in informed decision making (IDM) about PC screening. This study assessed perceptions of IDM recommendations and risk-appropriate strategies for IDM among FDRs of varied race/ethnicity. Design.: A cross-sectional, qualitative study design was used. Setting.: Study setting was a cancer center in southwest Florida. Participants.: The study comprised 44 participants (24 PC patients and 20 unaffected FDRs). Method.: Focus groups and individual interviews were conducted and analyzed using content analysis and constant comparison methods. Results.: Patients and FDRs found the PC screening debate and IDM recommendations to be complex and counterintuitive. They overwhelmingly believed screening saves lives and does not have associated harms. There was a strongly expressed need to improve communication between patients and FDRs. A single decision aid that addresses the needs of all FDRs, rather than one separating by race/ethnicity, was recommended as sufficient by study participants. These perspectives guided the development of an innovative decision aid that deconstructs the screening controversy and IDM processes into simpler concepts and provides step-by-step strategies for FDRs to engage in IDM. Conclusion.: Implementing IDM among FDRs is challenging because the IDM paradigm departs from historical messages promoting routine screening. These contradictions should be recognized and addressed for men to participate effectively in IDM. A randomized pilot study evaluating outcomes of the resulting decision aid is underway.


  • Informed decision making among first-degree relatives of prostate cancer survivors: A pilot randomized trial

    by Stacy N. Davis, Steven K. Sutton, Susan T. Vadaparampil, Cathy D. Meade, Brian M. Rivers, Mitul V. Patel, Javier F. Torres-Roca, Randy V. Heysek, Philippe Spiess, Julio Pow-Sang, et al.


  • Factors associated with comparative prostate cancer risk perception in first degree relatives

    by Stacy N. Davis, Steven K. Sutton, Mitul V. Patel, Susan T. Vadaparampil, Cathy D. Meade, Brian M. Rivers, Javier F. Torres-Roca, Randy V. Heysek, Philippe Spiess, Julio Pow-Sang, et al.

  • Understanding the Psychosocial Issues of African American Couples Surviving Prostate Cancer

    by Brian M. Rivers, Euna M. August, Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Clement K. Gwede, Julio M. Pow-Sang, B. Lee Green, Paul B. Jacobsen

    African Americans are disproportionately affected by prostate cancer, yet less is known about the most salient psychosocial dimensions of quality of life. The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of African American prostate cancer survivors and their spouses of psychosocial issues related to quality of life. Twelve African American couples were recruited from a National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center registry and a state-based non-profit organization to participate in individual interviews. The study was theoretically based on Ferrell’s Quality of Life Conceptual Model. Common themes emerged regarding the psychosocial needs of African American couples. These themes were categorized into behavioral, social, psychological, and spiritual domains. Divergent perspectives were identified between male prostate cancer survivors and their female spouses. This study delineated unmet needs and areas for future in-depth investigations into psychosocial issues. The differing perspectives between patients and their spouses highlight the need for couple-centered interventions.


  • Open Access

    Psychosocial issues related to sexual functioning among African‐American prostate cancer survivors and their spouses

    by Brian M. Rivers, Euna M. August, Clement K. Gwede, Alton Hart, Kristine A. Donovan, Julio M. Pow‐Sang, Gwendolyn P. Quinn

    Objective: Focus on cancer survivorship and quality of life (QOL) is a growing priority. The aim of this study was to identify and describe the most salient psychosocial concerns related to sexual functioning among African‐American (AA) prostate cancer survivors and their spouses.Methods: Twelve AA prostate cancer survivors and their spouses participated in semi‐structured individual interviews. The interviews assessed couples' experiences with psychosocial adjustment and sexual functioning posttreatment for localized prostate cancer. The data were analyzed using the constant comparison method and content analysis.Results: In this qualitative study of couples surviving prostate cancer, there were divergent views between the male prostate cancer survivors and their female partners, particularly regarding sexual functioning. For the males, QOL issues emerged as the primary area of concern, whereas survival of their husbands was considered most important among the female spouses. The male respondents expressed unease with the sexual side effects of their cancer treatment, such as erectile dysfunction and decreased sexual desire and satisfaction. Female spouses recognized decreased sexual desire in their partners following treatment, but this was not considered a primary concern.Conclusions: Patients and their spouses may have differing perceptions regarding QOL and the impact of sexual functioning on survivorship. This study points to the need for further research and intervention development to address these domains with a goal to improve QOL. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


  • Open Access

    Prostate cancer disparities in Black men of African descent: a comparative literature review of prostate cancer burden among Black men in the United States, Caribbean, United Kingdom, and West Africa

    by Folakemi T Odedina, Titilola O Akinremi, Frank Chinegwundoh, Robin Roberts, Daohai Yu, R Renee Reams, Matthew L Freedman, Brian Rivers, B Lee Green, Nagi Kumar

    African American men have the highest prostate cancer morbidity and mortality rates than any other racial or ethnic group in the US. Although the overall incidence of and mortality from prostate cancer has been declining in White men since 1991, the decline in African American men lags behind White men. Of particular concern is the growing literature on the disproportionate burden of prostate cancer among other Black men of West African ancestry in the Caribbean Islands, United Kingdom and West Africa. This higher incidence of prostate cancer observed in populations of African descent may be attributed to the fact that these populations share ancestral genetic factors. To better understand the burden of prostate cancer among men of West African Ancestry, we conducted a review of the literature on prostate cancer incidence, prevalence, and mortality in the countries connected by the Transatlantic Slave Trade.