Janet Franklin
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Janet Franklin has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Darren S. Smith
Department of Geography, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182–4493, USA
1 shared publicationDonald R. Drake
School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
1 shared publicationLeslie A. Bolick
Department of Geography, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182–4493, USA
1 shared publicationTimothy J. Motley
The Lewis B. and Dorothy Cullman Program for Molecular Systematics Studies, The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458–5126, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 24 February 1999
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Vegetation Science
- Vol. 10 (1) , 51-64
Rain forest composition and patterns of secondary succession in the Vava'u Island Group, Tonga
- 24 February 1999
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Vegetation Science
- Vol. 10 (1) , 51-64
Rain forest composition and patterns of secondary succession in the Vava'u Island Group, Tonga
- 24 February 1998
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Vegetation Science
- Vol. 9 (5) , 733-748
Predicting the distribution of shrub species in southern California from climate and terrain‐derived variables
Generalized additive, generalized linear, and classification tree models were developed to predict the distribution of 20 species of chaparral and coastal sage shrubs within the southwest ecoregion of California. Mapped explanatory variables included bioclimatic attributes related to primary environmental regimes: averages of annual precipitation, minimum temperature of the coldest month, maximum temperature of the warmest month, and topographically‐distributed potential solar insolation of the wettest quarter (winter) and of the growing season (spring). Also tested for significance were slope angle (related to soil depth) and the geographic coordinates of each observation. Models were parameterized and evaluated based on species presence/absence data from 906 plots surveyed on National Forest lands. Although all variables were significant in at least one of the species’ models, those models based only on the bioclimatic variables predicted species presence with 3–26% error. While error would undoubtedly be greater if the models were evaluated using independent data, results indicate that these models are useful for predictive mapping – for interpolating species distribution data within the ecoregion. All three methods produced models with similar accuracy for a given species; GAMs were useful for exploring the shape of the response functions, GLMs allowed those response functions to be parameterized and their significance tested, and classification trees, while some‐times difficult to interpret, yielded the lowest prediction errors (lower by 3–5%).
- 24 February 1998
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Vegetation Science
- Vol. 9 (5) , 733-748
Predicting the distribution of shrub species in southern California from climate and terrain‐derived variables
Generalized additive, generalized linear, and classification tree models were developed to predict the distribution of 20 species of chaparral and coastal sage shrubs within the southwest ecoregion of California. Mapped explanatory variables included bioclimatic attributes related to primary environmental regimes: averages of annual precipitation, minimum temperature of the coldest month, maximum temperature of the warmest month, and topographically‐distributed potential solar insolation of the wettest quarter (winter) and of the growing season (spring). Also tested for significance were slope angle (related to soil depth) and the geographic coordinates of each observation. Models were parameterized and evaluated based on species presence/absence data from 906 plots surveyed on National Forest lands. Although all variables were significant in at least one of the species’ models, those models based only on the bioclimatic variables predicted species presence with 3–26% error. While error would undoubtedly be greater if the models were evaluated using independent data, results indicate that these models are useful for predictive mapping – for interpolating species distribution data within the ecoregion. All three methods produced models with similar accuracy for a given species; GAMs were useful for exploring the shape of the response functions, GLMs allowed those response functions to be parameterized and their significance tested, and classification trees, while some‐times difficult to interpret, yielded the lowest prediction errors (lower by 3–5%).